메뉴 건너뛰기
Research Evaluation
Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 237-247
Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants' publication strategies and peormance: The case of the ERC starting grants
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

EID: 84887876078     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: 14715449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvt014     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (38)
References (12)
  • 1
    • 34447551604 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h-index. Extent of and reasons for type i and type ii errors
    • Bornmann, L. and Daniel, H.-D. (2007) 'Convergent Validation of Peer Review Decisions Using the H-Index. Extent of and Reasons for Type I and Type II Errors', Journal of Informetrics, 1/3: 204-13.
    • (2007) Journal of Informetrics , vol.1 , Issue.3 , pp. 204-213
    • Bornmann, L.1    Daniel, H.-D.2
  • 2
    • 55649086594 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two european molecular biology organization programmes
    • Bornmann, L., Wallon, G. and Ledin, A. (2008) 'Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes', PLoS One, 3/10: e3480.
    • (2008) PLoS One , vol.3 , Issue.10
    • Bornmann, L.1    Wallon, G.2    Ledin, A.3
  • 3
    • 77949318611 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bibliometrics as a peormance measurement tool for research evaluation: The case of research funded by the national cancer institute of Canada
    • Campbell, D. et al. (2010) 'Bibliometrics as a Peormance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada', American Journal of Evaluation, 31/1: 66-83.
    • (2010) American Journal of Evaluation , vol.31 , Issue.1 , pp. 66-83
    • Campbell, D.1
  • 4
    • 84887971242 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • European Commission., European Commission, C(2008)
    • European Commission. (2008) 'ERC Work Programme 2009', European Commission, C(2008) 3673.
    • (2008) ERC Work Programme 2009 , pp. 3673
  • 5
    • 84887929968 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • European Commission, European Commission, C(2012)
    • European Commission (2012) 'ERC Work Programme 2013', European Commission, C(2012) 4562.
    • (2012) ERC Work Programme 2013 , pp. 4562
  • 6
    • 29944438252 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The history and meaning of the journal impact factor
    • Garfield, E. (2006) 'The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor', JAMA, 255/1S: 90-3.
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.255 , Issue.1 S , pp. 90-93
    • Garfield, E.1
  • 7
    • 78650520027 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • There are neither king nor crown in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed alternative method of normalization
    • Gingras, Y. and Larivière, V. (2011) 'There are Neither "King" Nor "Crown" in Scientometrics: Comments on a Supposed "Alternative" Method of Normalization', Journal of Informetrics, 5/1: 226-7.
    • (2011) Journal of Informetrics , vol.5 , Issue.1 , pp. 226-227
    • Gingras, Y.1    Larivière, V.2
  • 8
    • 63049126271 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Funding of young scientists and scientific excellence
    • Hornbostel, S. et al. (2009) 'Funding of Young Scientists and Scientific Excellence', Scientometrics, 79/1: 171-90.
    • (2009) Scientometrics , vol.79 , Issue.1 , pp. 171-190
    • Hornbostel, S.1
  • 9
    • 33947118203 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The top eight percent: Development of approved and rejected applicants for a prestigious grant in sweden
    • Melin, G. and Danell, R. (2006) 'The Top Eight Percent: Development of Approved and Rejected Applicants for a Prestigious Grant in Sweden', Science and Public Policy, 33/10: 702-12.
    • (2006) Science and Public Policy , vol.33 , Issue.10 , pp. 702-712
    • Melin, G.1    Danell, R.2
  • 10
    • 79955389782 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Informed peer review and uninformed bibliometrics?
    • Neufeld, J. and von Ins, M. (2011) 'Informed Peer Review and Uninformed Bibliometrics?', Research Evaluation, 20/1: 31-46.
    • (2011) Research Evaluation , vol.20 , Issue.1 , pp. 31-46
    • Neufeld, J.1    Von Ins, M.2
  • 11
    • 84887935874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Funding programs for young scientists - do the 'best' apply?
    • Neufeld, J. and Hornbostel, S. (2012) 'Funding Programs for Young Scientists - Do the 'Best' Apply?', Research Evaluation, 21/3: 1-10.
    • (2012) Research Evaluation , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 1-10
    • Neufeld, J.1    Hornbostel, S.2
  • 12
    • 78650523754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations
    • Waltman, L. et al. (2011) 'Towards a New Crown Indicator: Some Theoretical Considerations', Journal of Informetrics, 5: 37-47.
    • (2011) Journal of Informetrics , vol.5 , pp. 37-47
    • Waltman, L.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.