Consequences of the analysis of Latin Infinitival Clauses for the theory of case and control

Lingue e Linguaggio

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 151-189

  Cecchetto, Carlo ^a   Oniga, Renato ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887827190     PISSN: 17209331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1418/7560     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bolkestein, A.M. (1976), A.c.i. and Ut-clauses with Verba Dicendi in Latin, «Glotta», 54, 263-91.
2. Bolkestein, A.M. (1979), Subject-to-Object Raising in Latin?, «Lingua», 48, 15-34.
3. Bortolussi, B. (2000), L'infinitif substantivé, in Fruyt, M. and C. Nicolas (éds.), La création lexicale en latin, Paris, PUPS, 61-73.
4. Calboli, G. (1996), The Accusative as a Default Case in Latin, in Rosén, H. (ed.), Aspects of Latin, Innsbruck, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, 423-36.
5. Chomsky, N. (1981), Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht, Foris.
6. Chomsky, N. (1995), The Minimalist Program, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, N. (2000), Minimalist Explorations, in Martin, R., D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 89-155.
8. Cuzzolin, P. (1994), Sull'origine della costruzione «dicere quod»: aspetti sintattici e semantici, Firenze, La Nuova Italia.
9. 2), Syntaxe latine, Paris, Klincksieck.
10. Giorgi, A. and G. Longobardi (1991), The Syntax of Noun Phrases, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press.
11. Haegeman, L. (1994), Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, Oxford, Blackwell.
12. Henry, A. (1996), Belfast English and Standard English, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
13. Hofmann, J.B. and A. Szantyr (1965), Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik, München, Beck.
14. Iatridou, S. (1993), On Nominative Case Assignment and a Few Related Things, «MIT Working Papers in Linguistics», 19.
15. Kayne, R. (1984), Connectedness and Binary Branching, Dordrecht, Foris.
16. Lakoff, R.T. (1968), Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
17. Longobardi, G. (1996), The Syntax of N-raising: a Minimalist Theory, «OTS Working Papers in Linguistics».
18. Molinelli, P. and N. Vincent (forthcoming), Proceedings of the Workshop on «Default Case in Latin», held at University of Bergamo in October 1999.
19. Oniga, R. (1988), I composti nominali latini, Bologna, Pàtron.
20. Oniga, R. (1996), Per una teoria della diatesi in latino, «Bollettino di Studi Latini », 26, 235-50.
21. Pepicello, W.J. (1977), Raising in Latin, «Lingua», 42, 209-18.
22. Pillinger, O.S. (1980), The Accusative and Infinitive in Latin: a Refractory Complement Clause, «Journal of Linguistics», 16, 55-83.
23. Raposo, E. (1987), Romance Infinitival Clauses and Case Theory, in Neidle, C. and R.A. Núñez Cedeño (eds.), Studies in Romance Languages, Dordrecht, Foris, 237-49.
24. Rizzi, L. (1986), Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro, «Linguistic Inquiry », 17, 501-57.
25. Schoof, S. (2001), Impersonal and Personal Passivization of Latin Infinitive Constructions: A Scrutiny of the Structure Called AcI, Ms., University of Groningen.
26. Stowell, T. (1981), Origins of Phrase Structure, PhD. Dissertation, Cambridge (Mass.).