Modelling route choice behaviour in a tolled road network with a time surplus maximisation bi-objective user equilibrium model

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 57, Issue , 2013, Pages 342-360

  Wang, Judith Y T ^a,b   Ehrgott, Matthias ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Equilibrium problem; Multi objective optimisation; Route choice; Traffic assignment

Indexed keywords

COST FUNCTIONS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ROADS AND STREETS; TRAVEL TIME;

EQUILIBRIUM PROBLEM; EQUILIBRIUM SOLUTIONS; INDIFFERENCE CURVES; MODELING ROUTES; ROUTE CHOICE; ROUTE CHOICE BEHAVIOUR; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT; USER EQUILIBRIUM;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; MODELING; OPTIMIZATION; ROUTING; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 84887822568     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aashtiani, H., 1979. The Multi-Modal Traffic Assignment Problem. Ph.D. thesis, Operations Research Center, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
2. Abdel-Aty M.A., Kitamura R., Jovanis P.P. Investigating effect of travel time variability on route choice using repeated-measurement stated preference data. Transportation Research Record 1995, 1493:39-45.
3. Beckmann M.J., McGuire C.B., Winsten C.B. Studies in the Economics of Transportation 1956, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
4. Bekhor S., Ben-Akiva M., Ramming M. Evaluation of choice set generation algorithms for route choice models. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 144(1):235-247.
5. Bovy P., Fiorenzo-Catalano S. Stochastic route choice set generation: behavioral and probabilistic foundations. Transportmetrica 2007, 3(3):173-189.
6. Brownstone D., Small K. Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39(4):279-293.
7. Bureau of Public Roads, 1964. Traffic Assignment Manual. US Department of Commerce, Urban Planning Division, Washington, DC.
8. Chen A., Oh J., Park D., Recker W. Solving the bicriteria traffic equilibrium problem with variable demand and nonlinear path costs. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2010, 217(7):3020-3031.
9. Chen L., Yang H. Managing congestion and emissions in road networks with tolls and rebates. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46(8):933-948.
10. Dafermos S., Sparrow F. The traffic assignment problem for a general network. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Series B 1969, 73(2):91-118.
11. Daganzo C.F., Sheffi Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Science 1977, 11(3):253-274.
12. Dial R. A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Research 1971, 5(2):83-113.
13. Dial R. A model and algorithm for multicriteria route-mode choice. Transportation Research Part B 1979, 13(4):311-316.
14. Dial R. Bicriterion traffic assignment: basic theory and elementary algorithms. Transportation Science 1996, 30(2):93-111.
15. Dial R. Bicriterion traffic assignment: efficient algorithms plus examples. Transportation Research Part B 1997, 31(5):357-379.
16. Fisk C. Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment. Transportation Research Part B 1980, 14(3):243-255.
17. Florian M. Network equilibrium models for analyzing toll highways. Mathematical and Computational Models for Congestion Charging 2006, 105-115. Springer, New York. S. Lawphongpanich, D.W. Hearn, M.J. Smith (Eds.).
18. Florian M., Constantin I., Florian D. A new look at projected gradient method for equilibrium assignment. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2090:10-16.
19. Florian M., Hearn D. Network equilibrium models and algorithms. Network Routing 1995, 485-550. Elsevier, Amsterdam. M. Ball (Ed.).
20. Frank F., Wolfe P. An algorithm for quadratic programming. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 1956, 3(1-2):95-110.
21. Gabriel S., Bernstein D. The traffic equilibrium problem with nonadditive path costs. Transportation Science 1997, 31(4):337-348.
22. Guo X., Yang H. User heterogeneity and bi-criteria system optimum. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43(4):379-390.
23. Hensher D., Truong P. Valuation of travel time savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1985, 19(3):237-261.
24. Jayakrishnan A., Tsai W.K., Rajadhyaksha S. A faster path-based algorithm for traffc assignment. Transportation Research Record 1994, 1443:75-83.
25. Lam T., Small K. The value of time and reliability: measurement from a value pricing experiment. Transportation Research Part E 2001, 37(2-3):231-251.
26. Larsson T., Lindberg P.O., Patriksson M., Rydergren C. On traffic equilibrium models with a nonlinear time/money relation. Transportation Planning: State of the Art 2002, 19-31. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. M. Patriksson, M. Labbé (Eds.).
27. Leurent F. Cost versus time equilibrium over a network. European Journal of Operational Research 1993, 71(2):205-221.
28. Liu H., Recker W., Chen A. Uncovering the contribution of travel time reliability to dynamic route choice using real-time loop data. Transportation Research Part A 2004, 38(6):435-453.
29. Lo H.K., Chen A. Traffic equilibrium problem with route-specific costs: formulation and algorithms. Transportation Research Part B 2000, 34(6):493-513.
30. Luce R.D., Suppes P. Preference, utility and subjective probability. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology 1965, 249-410. John Wiley & Sons. R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, E. Galanter (Eds.).
31. Maher M. SAM - a stochastic assignment model. Mathematics in Transport Planning and Control 1992, 121-132. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Griffiths (Ed.).
32. Milchtaich I. Topological conditions for uniqueness of equilibrium in networks. Mathematics of Operations Research 2005, 30(1):225-244.
33. Prashker J.N., Bekhor S. A review on route choice models used in the stochastic user equilibrium problem. Transport Reviews 2004, 24(4):437-463.
34. Raith A., Ehrgott M. On vector equilibria, vector optimization and vector variational inequalities. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 2011, 18(1-2):39-54.
35. Raith A., Wang J.Y.T., Ehrgott M., Mitchell S. Solving multi-objective traffic assignment. Annals of Operations Research 2013, 10.1007/s10479-012-12841.
36. Richman O., Shimkin N. Topological uniqueness of nash equilibrium for selfish routing with atomic users. Mathematics of Operations Research 2007, 32(1):215-232.
37. Rosa A., Maher M. Algorithms for solving the probit path-based stochastic user equilibrium traffic assignment problem with one or more user classes. Transportation and Traffic Theory in the 21st Century - Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Adelaide, Australia, 16-18 July 2002 2002, 371-392. Pergamon Press, Oxford. M. Taylor (Ed.).
38. Sheffi Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods 1985, Prentice-Hall.
39. Sheffi Y., Powell W.B. An algorithm for the equilibrium assignment problem with random link times. Networks 1982, 12(2):191-207.
40. Wang, J.Y.T., Ehrgott, M., in press. Bi-objective network equilibrium, traffic assignment and road pricing. In: Helber. S. (Ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2012, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
41. Wang J.Y.T., Raith A., Ehrgott M. Tolling analysis with bi-objective traffic assignment. Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems 2010, 117-129. Springer Verlag, Berlin. M. Ehrgott, B. Naujoks, T. Stewart, J. Wallenius (Eds.).
42. Wardrop J.G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Divisions 1952, 1:325-362.
43. Yang H., Huang H. The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38(1):1-15.