A flexibly structured lot sizing heuristic for a static remanufacturing system

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 44, Issue , 2014, Pages 21-31

  Schulz, Tobias ^a   Voigt, Guido ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

EOQ; Inventory management; Lot sizing; Remanufacturing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887812623     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. SBB solver manual. In: G. D. Corporation, editor. GAMS - The solver manuals, 2009. p. 513-20.
2. Akçali E., Çetinkaya S. Quantitative models for inventory and production planning in closed-loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Research 2011, 49(8):2373-2407.
3. Barker T., Zabinsky Z. A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega 2011, 39:558-573.
4. Choi D., Hwang H., Koh S. A generalized ordering and recovery policy for reusable items. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 182(2):764-774.
5. Feng Y., Viswanathan S. A new lot-sizing heuristic for manufacturing systems with product recovery. International Journal of Production Economics 2011, 133.
6. Feng Y, Viswanathan S. Heuristics with guaranteed performance bounds for a manufacturing system with product recovery [Technical report]. Singapore: Nanyang Business School; 2012.
7. Francas D., Minner S. Manufacturing network configuration in supply chains with product recovery. Omega 2009, 37:757-769.
8. Guide V.D.R. Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management 2000, 18(4):467-483.
9. Konstantaras I., Skouri K. Lot sizing for a single product recovery system with variable setup numbers. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 203:326-335.
10. Li X., Baki F., Tian P., Chaouch B. A robust block-chain based tabu search algorithm for the dynamic lot sizing problem with product returns and remanufacturing. Omega 2014, 42:75-87.
11. Liu N., Kim Y., Hwang H. An optimal operating policy for the production system with rework. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2009, 56(3):874-887.
12. Minner S., Lindner G. Lot sizing decisions in product recovery management. Reverse logistics - quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains 2004, 157-179. Springer. R. Dekker, M. Fleischmann, K. Inderfurth, L. Van Wassenhove (Eds.).
13. Mitra S. Revenue management for remanufactured products. Omega 2007, 35.
14. Mitra S. Analysis of a two-echelon inventory system with returns. Omega 2009, 37.
15. Schrady D. A deterministic inventory model for reparable items. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 1967, 14:391-398.
16. Schulz T. Optimal and predefined policies for the static lot sizing problem in a two stage recovery system [Technical Report 7]. Faculty of Economics and Management, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg; 2011.
17. Schulz T. A new silver-meal based heuristic for the single-item dynamic lot sizing problem with returns and remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Research 2011, 49(9):2519-2533.
18. Srivastava S. Network design for reverse logistics. Omega 2008, 36:535-548.
19. Teunter R. Economic ordering quantities for recoverable item inventory systems. Naval Research Logistics 2001, 48(6):484-495.
20. Teunter R., van der Laan E., Inderfurth K. How to set the holding cost rates in average cost inventory models with reverse logistics. Omega 2000, 28(4):409-415.
21. Teunter R., Bayindir Z., van den Heuvel W. Dynamic lot sizing with product returns and remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Research 2006, 44(20):4377-4400.
22. Thierry M., Salomon M., van Nunen J., Van Wassenhove L. Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review 1995, 37(2):114-135.
23. Volkswagen. Umweltbilanz Austauschgetriebe, September 2010.
24. Zhou L., Naim M., Tang O., Towill D. Dynamic performance of a hybrid inventory system with a Kanban policy in remanufacturing process. Omega 2006, 34:585-598.