Review of the new methodology of analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 52, Issue , 1998, Pages 837-840

  Ikeda, Mitsuru ^a   Ishigaki, Takeo ^b   Yamauchi, Kazunobu ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diagnostic Tests; Jackknife Analysis; Ordinal Regression; ROC Curves; Technology Assessment

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; DIAGNOSIS; SIGNAL RECEIVERS;

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS; JACKKNIFE ANALYSIS; ORDINAL REGRESSION; ROC CURVES; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA);

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; RADIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNIQUE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; METHODS; RADIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84887808802     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-896-0-837     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Gurney JW.Neural networks at The crossroads: caution ahead.Radiology 1994: 193: 27-30.
2. Dorfman DD and Alf E.Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals-Rating-method data.J Math Psych 1969: 6: 487-496.
3. orfman DD, Berbaum KS, and Metz CE.Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis.Generalization to The population of readers and patients with The jackknife method.Invest Radiol 1992: 27: 723-31.
4. osteson AN and Begg CB.A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.Med Decis Making 1988: 8: 204-15.
5. oledano AY and Gatsonis C.Ordinal regression methodology for ROC curves derived from correlated data.Stat Med 1996: 15: 1807-26.
6. fron B and Tibshirani RJ.An Introduction to The Bootstrap.New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993.