The phenotype and the components of phenotypic variance of crop traits

Field Crops Research

Volumn 154, Issue , 2013, Pages 255-259

  Sadras, V O ^a   Rebetzke, G J ^b   Edmeades, G O ^c  

^a SOUTH AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c Consultant ^*  (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Breeding; Development; Genomics; Phenotype; Plasticity; QTL; Stress; Yield

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AGRICULTURAL MODELING; AGRONOMY; FOOD SECURITY; GENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY;

EID: 84887704729     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alvarez Prado S., López C.G., Gambín B.L., Abertondo V.J., Borrás L. Dissecting the genetic basis of physiological processes determining maize kernel weight using the IBM (B73×Mo17) Syn4 population. Field Crops Res. 2013, 145:33-43.
2. Aphalo P.J., Ballaré C.L. On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactions. Funct. Ecol. 1995, 9:5-14.
3. Boccalandro H.E., Ploschuk E.L., Yanovsky M.J., Sanchez R.A., Gatz C., Casal J.J. Increased Phytochrome B alleviates density effects on tuber yield of field potato crops. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133:1539-1546.
4. Borras-Gelonch G., Rebetzke G.J., Richards R.A., Romagosa I. Genetic control of duration of pre-anthesis phases in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and relationships to leaf appearance, tillering, and dry matter accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:69-89.
5. Bradshaw A.D. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 1965, 13:115-155.
6. Brekke B., Edwards J., Knapp A. Selection and adaptation to high plant density in the Iowa stiff stalk synthetic maize (Zea mays L.) population. Crop. Sci. 2011, 51:1965-1972.
7. Carroll M.W., Head G., Caprio M. When and where a seed mix refuge makes sense for managing insect resistance to Bt plants. Crop Prot. 2012, 38:74-79.
8. Chandler P.M., Robertson M. Gene-expression regulated by abscisic-acid and its relation to stress tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1994, 45:113-141.
9. Chapman S.C., Cooper M., Butler D.G., Henzell R.G. Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. I. Characteristics that confound interpretation of hybrid yield. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 2000, 51:197-207.
10. Chenu K., Deihimfard R., Chapman S.C. Large-scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent-wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt - spatial and temporal trends. New Phytol. 2013, 198:801-820.
11. Crossa J., Fox P.N., Pfeiffer W.H., Rajaram S., Gauch H.G. AMMI adjustment for statistical-analysis of an international wheat yield trial. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1991, 81:27-37.
12. Cullis B.R., Smith A.B., Coombes N.E. On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data. J. Agric. Biol. Env. Stat. 2006, 11:381-393.
13. D'Andrea K.E., Otegui M.E., Cirilo A.G., Eyhérabide G.H. Parent-progeny relationships between maize inbreds and hybrids: analysis of grain yield and its determinants for contrasting soil nitrogen conditions. Crop. Sci. 2013, 53:2147-2161.
14. Davidson A.M., Jennions M., Nicotra A.B. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:419-431.
15. de la Vega A.J., DeLacy I.H., Chapman S.C. Progress over 20 years of sunflower breeding in central Argentina. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100:61-72.
16. Denison R.F. Darwinian Agriculture: How Understanding Evolution Can Improve Agriculture 2012, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
17. DeWitt T.J., Langerhans R.B. Integrated solutions to environmental heterogeneity. Phenotypic Plasticity. Functional and Conceptual Approaches 2004, 98-111. Oxford University Press, New York. T.J. DeWitt, S.M. Scheiner (Eds.).
18. DeWitt T.J., Scheiner S.M. Phenotypic Plasticity. Functional and Conceptual Approaches 2004, Oxford University Press, New York.
19. Dingemanse N.J., Kazem A.J.N., Reale D., Wright J. Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:81-89.
20. Donald C.M. Competitive plants, communal plants, and yield in wheat crops. Wheat Science - Today and Tomorrow 1981, 223-247. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. L.T. Evans, W.J. Peacock (Eds.).
21. Edmeades G.O., McMaster G.S., White J.W., Campos H. Genomics and the physiologist: bridging the gap between genes and crop response. Field Crops Res. 2004, 90:5-18.
22. Edwards D., Batley J., Snowdon J.R. Accessing complex crop genomes with next-generation sequencing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:1-11.
23. Evans L.T. Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Evans M.E.K., Dennehy J.J. Germ banking: bet-hedging and variable release from egg and seed dormancy. Q. Rev. Biol. 2005, 80:431-451.
25. Flores F., Hybl M., Knudsen J.C., Marget P., Muel F., Nadal S., Narits L., Raffiot B., Sass O., Solis I., Winkler J., Stoddard F.L., Rubiales D. Adaptation of spring faba bean types across European climates. Field Crops Res. 2013, 145:1-9.
26. Galloway L.F., Etterson J.R., McGlothlin J.W. Contribution of direct and maternal genetic effects to life-history evolution. New Phytol. 2009, 183:826-838.
27. Gambin B.L., Borrás L. Plasticity of sorghum kernel weight to increased assimilate availability. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100:272-284.
28. Gambín B.L., Borrás L. Resource distribution and the trade-off between seed number and seed weight: a comparison across crop species. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2010, 156:91-102.
29. Gauch H.G., Rodrigues P.C., Munkvold J.D., Heffner E.L., Sorrells M. Two new strategies for detecting and understanding QTL×environment interactions. Crop Sci. 2011, 51:96-113.
30. Guglielmini A.C., Ghersa C.M., Satorre E.H. Co-evolution of domesticated crops and associated weeds. Ecol. Austral 2007, 17:167-178.
31. Harper J.L. The Population Biology of Plants 1977, Academic Press, London.
32. Hoffmann C.M., Huijbregts T., van Swaaij N., Jansen R. Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. Eur. J. Agron. 2009, 30:17-26.
33. Jensen H.R., Dreiseitl A., Sadiki M., Schoen D.J. The Red Queen and the seed bank: pathogen resistance of ex situ and in situ conserved barley. Evol. Appl. 2012, 5:353-367.
34. Jiang M.K., Bullock J.M., Hooftman D.A.P. REVIEW: mapping ecosystem service and biodiversity changes over 70years in a rural English county. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50:841-850.
35. Lacaze X., Hayes P.M., Korol A. Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare. Heredity 2009, 102:163-173.
36. Lemaire G., Gastal F. Quantifying crop responses to nitrogen deficiency and avenues to improve nitrogen-use efficiency. Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy 2009, 171-211. Academic Press, San Diego. V.O. Sadras, D.F. Calderini (Eds.).
37. Mahner M., Kary M. What exactly are genomes, genotypes and phenotypes? And what about phenomes?. J. Theor. Biol. 1997, 186:55-63.
38. Maynard Smith J., Szathmáry E. The Major Transitions in Evolution 1995, W.H. Freeman & Co Ltd., Oxford.
39. McDonald G.K., Gill G.S. Improving crop competitiviness with weeds: adaptations and trade-offs. Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy 2009, 449-488. Academic Press, San Diego. V.O. Sadras, D.F. Calderini (Eds.).
40. Messina C., Hammer G., Dong Z., Podlich D., Cooper M. Modelling crop improvement in a G×E×M framework via gene-trait-phenotype relationship. Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy 2009, 235-265. Academic Press, San Diego. V.O. Sadras, D.F. Calderini (Eds.).
41. Nachtomy O., Shavit A., Yakhini Z. Gene expression and the concept of the phenotype. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2007, 38:238-254.
42. Pedró A., Savin R., Slafer G.A. Crop productivity as related to single-plant traits at key phenological stages in durum wheat. Field Crops Res. 2012, 138:42-51.
43. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jauhiainen L., Sadras V.O. Phenotypic plasticity of yield and agronomic traits in cereals and rapeseed at high latitudes. Field Crops Res. 2011, 124:261-269.
44. Pichancourt J.-B., van Klinken R.D. Phenotypic plasticity influences the size, shape and dynamics of the geographic distribution of an invasive plant. PLoS ONE 2012, 7.
45. Quenouille J., Vassilakos N., Moury B. Potato virus Y: a major crop pathogen that has provided major insights into the evolution of viral pathogenicity. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14:439-452.
46. Rebetzke G.J., Chenu K., Biddulph B., Moeller C., Deery D.M., Rattey A.R., Bennett D., Barrett-Lennard E.G., Mayer J.E. A multisite managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm phenotyping. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40:1-13.
47. Rebetzke G.J., Fischer R.A., van Herwaarden A.F., Bonnett D.G., Chenu K., Rattey A.R., Fettell N.F. Plot size matters: the importance of competition in plant phenotyping studies. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013.
48. Rebetzke G.J., van Herwaarden A.F., Jenkins C., Weiss M., Lewis D., Ruuska S., Tabe L., Fettell N.A., Richards R.A. Quantitative trait loci for water-soluble carbohydrates and associations with agronomic traits in wheat. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 2008, 59:891-905.
49. Reymond M., Muller B., Leonardi A., Charcosset A., Tardieu F. Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131:664-675.
50. Rhone B., Vitalis R., Goldringer I., Bonnin I. Evolution of flowering time in experimental wheat populations: a comprehensive approach to detect genetic signatures of natural selection. Evolution 2010, 64:2110-2125.
51. Sadras V.O. Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100:125-138.
52. Sadras V.O., Denison R.F. Do plant parts compete for resources? An evolutionary perspective. New Phytol. 2009, 183:565-574.
53. Sadras V.O., Lawson C., Hooper P., McDonald G.K. Contribution of summer rainfall and nitrogen to the yield and water use efficiency of wheat in Mediterranean-type environments of South Australia. Eur. J. Agron. 2012, 36:41-54.
54. Sadras V.O., Rebetzke G.J. Plasticity of tillering is associated with plasticity of grain yield in wheat. Crop Pasture Sci. 2013, 64:234-243.
55. Sage R.F., Sage T.L., Kocacinar F. Photorespiration and the evolution of C-4 photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63:19-47.
56. Sarkar S. From the Reaktionorms to the evolution of adaptive plasticity. Phenotypic Plasiticy. Functional and Conceptual Approaches 2004, 10-30. Oxford University Press, New York. T.J. DeWitt, S.M. Scheiner (Eds.).
57. Sinclair T.R., Rufty T.W. Nitrogen and water resources commonly limit crop yield increases, not necessarily plant genetics. Global Food Secur. 2012, 1:94-98.
58. Sinclair T.R., Seligman N. Criteria for publishing papers on crop modeling. Field Crops Res. 2000, 68:165-172.
59. Smith A.B., Lim P., Cullis B.R. The design and analysis of multi-phase plant breeding experiments. J. Agr. Sci. 2006, 144:393-409.
60. Smith C.C., Fretwell S.D. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 1974, 108:499-506.
61. Trentacoste E.R., Sadras V.O., Puertas C.M. Effects of the source:sink ratio on the phenotypic plasticity of stem water potential in olive (Olea europaea L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:3535-3543.
62. Tuberosa R. Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3.
63. Tuberosa R., Graner A., Varshney R.K. Genomics of plant genetic resources: an introduction. Plant Genet. Resour. 2011, 9:151-154.
64. West-Eberhard M.J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
65. Westlake D.F. Comparisons of plant productivity. Biol. Rev. 1963, 38:385-425.
66. White J.W., Andrade-Sanchez P., Gore M.A., Bronson K.F., Coffelt T.A., Conley M.M., Feldmann K.A., French A.N., Heun J.T., Hunsaker D.J., Jenks M.A., Kimball B.A., Roth R.L., Strand R.J., Thorp K.R., Wall G.W., Wang G. Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Res. 2012, 133:101-112.
67. Woltereck R. Weitere experimentelle Vntersuchungen iiber Artverandenmg, spcziell fiber das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden. Verh. Deutsch. Zool. Ges. 1909, 19:110-172.
68. Yang R.C., Blade S.F., Crossa J., Stanton D., Bandara M.S. Identifying isoyield environments for field pea production. Crop Sci. 2005, 45:106-113.
69. Zhang H., Turner N.C., Simpson N., Poole M.L. Growing-season rainfall, ear number and the water-limited potential yield of wheat in south-western Australia. Crop Pasture Sci. 2010, 61:296-303.
70. Zhang H.P., Berger J.D., Milroy S.P. Genotype×environment interaction studies highlight the role of phenology in specific adaptation of canola (Brassica napus) to contrasting Mediterranean climates. Field Crops Res. 2013, 144:77-88.
71. Zhu J.M., Zhang C.C., Lynch J.P. The utility of phenotypic plasticity of root hair length for phosphorus acquisition. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37:313-322.