The economic implications of users willingness to increase knowledge capital in health informatics

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 52, Issue , 1998, Pages 711-715

  Vimarlund, Vivian ^a   Timpka, Toomas ^a   Hallberg, Nikias ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Education in Health Informatics; Knowledge Capital; System Development Methods; Utility Valuation; Willingness to Pay

Indexed keywords

COMPENSATION (PERSONNEL); ECONOMICS; INFORMATION USE;

CONTINGENT VALUATION METHODS; ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS; HEALTH INFORMATICS; HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS; KNOWLEDGE CAPITALS; SMALL-SCALE MODELING; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER LITERACY; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84887652282     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-896-0-711     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Patel V, Kushniruk A, and Kaufman D.Cognitive Evaluation Guideline for Assesing Computer-based Medical Technologies.Technical Report CS#l-96.Cognitive Studies in Medicine.Centre for Medical Education McGill University, 1996.
2. Kaplan B.Organizational Evaluation of Medical Information Resourcesln: Friedman C, and Wyatt JC, eds.Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics.New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997;pp.255-280.
3. Hanley N.Using Contingent Evaluation to Evalue Environmental Improvements.Applied Economics.1988; 20:541-549.
4. Mitchel RC and Carson RT, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Methods.Washington D.C: Resources for The future, 1989.
5. Portney PR.The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists should care.Journal of Economic Per spec-fives 1994; 4:3-17.
6. Yin RK.Case study research: Design and Methods (2nd ed).Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.
7. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Report of The NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.Federal register 1993; 58:10:4602-14.
8. Haneman MW.Valuing The Environment Trough Contingent Valuation.Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994; 8:4:19-43.
9. Loomis J.Some Empirial Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection.Journal Of Environmental Economics and Management 1993; 24:4555.
10. Fischhoff B and Furby L.Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to Contingent Valuation of Visibility.Journal Of Risk Uncertaintyl9S8; 1:147-184.
11. Kealy MJ, Montgomery M, and Dovidio JF.Reliability and Predictive Validity of Contingent Values: Does The Nature of The Good Matter?.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1990; 19:244-263.
12. Harris C, Driver BL, and McLaughlin WJ.Improving The Contingent Valuation Method: A Psychological Perspective.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1989; 17:213-229.
13. Hirshleifer J and Glazer A.Price Theory And Applications.(Fifth Edition).New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International Editions, 1992.
14. Lipsey RG, Steiner PO, and Purvis DD.Economics.(Eighth Edition).New York: Harper &Row Publishers Inc., 1987.
15. Becker GS.Human Capital.A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education.Third Edition.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
16. Arias-Vimarlund V, Ljunggren M, and Timpka T.Implementation of Computer-Based patient Records in Primary Care: The Societal Health Economic Effects.In: Cimino JJ eds.In: Proceeding of AMIA Annual Fall Symposium.Washington D.C.1996;pp.503-508.
17. Wardman M.A comparison of revealed preference and stated preference models.Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1988; 22:71-91.
18. Seip K and Strand J.Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: A contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment.Environmental and Resource Economics 1992; 2:91-106.
19. Michael RT and Becker G.On The new Theory of Consumer Behavior.The Swedish Journal of Economics 1973; 75:378-395.
20. Lancaster KJ.A new Approach to Consumer Theory.The Journal of Political Economy 1966; 74:132-157.
21. Becker GS.Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory.The Journal of Political Economy 1962; 52:1:1-13.