Rethinking the 1930s and the '15-year war' in Japan

Japanese Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 155-164

  Wilson, Sandra ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887640013     PISSN: 10371397     EISSN: 14699338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10371390120074336     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Yoshihashi, Takchiko. 1963. Conspiracy at Mukden: The Rise of the Japanese Military, viiiNew Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Smith, Sara R., 1948. The Manchurian Crisis 1931-1932: A Tragedy in International Relations, 3New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Saburo, Ienaga. 1978. The Pacifie War, 1931-1945: A Critical Perspective on Japan's Role in World War II, Edited by: Baldwin, Frank. xiii3New York: Pantheon Books.
4. Wilson, Sandra. 2001. The Manchurian Crisis and Japanese Society, 1931-33, London: Routledge. The significance of the crisis over Manchuria is reassessed in
5. Ienaga. Pacific War 247
6. Pritchard, R. John, and Zaide, Sonia, eds. 1981. The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Complete Transcripts of the Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East in Twenty-Two Volumes, Vol. 12, 28156–157. New York: Garland.
7. Shunsuke, Tsurumi. 1956. 'Nihon chishikijin no Amerikazo'. Chuokoron, 71 (814): 178 n. 1
8. Jun'ichiro, Kisaka. 1988. “ 'Jugonen senso no seikaku to senso no kosho ni tsuite' ”. In Nitchu senso to Nitchu kankei, Edited by: Kiyoshi, Inoue, and Shinkichi, Eto. 77Tokyo: Hara shobo.
9. Ienaga. Pacific War 247–249.
10. Ienaga. Pacific War 249
11. Yutaka, Yoshida. 1995. Nihonjin no sensokan, 30–32. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.
12. Ienaga. Pacific War 255
13. Shunsuke, Tsurumi. 1956. 'Chishikijin no senso sekinin'. Chuokoron, 71 (808): 57–63. A similar view is evident in Tsurumi, 'Nihon chishikijin no Amerikazo', also published in 1956, though the term '15-year war' is not actually used in this article
14. Yoshida. Nihorgin no sensokan 99–100.
15. Shiso no kagaku kenkyukai, ed. 1959. Tenko, Vol. 1, Tokyo: Heibonsha.
16. Takaaki, Yoshimoto. 1958. 'Tenkoron', Gendai hihyo 1
17. Takaaki, Yoshimoto. 1968-1974. Yoshimoto Takaaki zen chosakushu, 15 vols, Tokyo: Keiso shobo. Vol. 13: Seiji shiso hyoromhu, pp. 5-27
18. Masashi, Nezu. 1976. 'Nihon no senso bungaku'. Rekishi hyoron, February
19. Yoshida. Nihonjin no sensokan 99
20. Tsurumi. “ 'Nihon chishikijin no Amerikazo' ”. 178 n. 1
21. Ienaga. Pacific War 247–248.
22. Ju-feng, Wang. “ 'KoNichi senso no kiten: Rokokyo jiken' ”. In Nitchu senso to Nitehu kankei Edited by: Inoue and Eto. 62 Mao Tse-tung, on the other hand, asserted that China had been a colony of Japan since 193 1: quoted in
23. Katsumi, Usui. 1981. On the Duration of the Pacific War: A New Look at the Accepted View'. Japan Quarterly, 28 (4): 479–488.
24. Toshikazu, Inoue. 1994. Kiki no naka no kyocho gaiko: Nitchu senso ni itaru taigai seisaku no keisei to tenkai, Tokyo: Yamakawa shuppansha.
25. Conroy, Hilary, and Wray, Harry, eds. 1990. Pearl Harbor Reexamined: Prologue to the Pacifie War, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. for example, various essays in
26. Akira, Fujiwara. “ 'The Road to Pearl Harbor' ”. 151–161.
27. Kei'ichi, Eguchi. “ 'Rokokyo jiken e no michi: jugonen senso no shikaku' ”. In Nitchu senso to Nitchu kankei Edited by: Inoue and Eto. 93–106.
28. Dryburgh, Marjorie. 2000. North China and Japanese Expansion 1933-1937: Regional Power and the National Interest, Richmond, Surrey: Curzon. Kisaka, 'Jugonen senso no seikaku'. On developments in North China after 1933, see
29. Beasley, W. G., 1987. Japanese Imperialism 1894-1945, 818390–100. 106Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30. Wang. “ 'KoNichi senso no kiten' ”. 5567–68.
31. Jun'ichiro, Kisaka. 1995. “ 'Ajia-Taiheiyo senso no rekishiteki seikaku o megutte' ”. In Nenpo Nihon gendaishi sokan: sengo gojunen no rekishiteki kenso 29–31.
32. Inoue. Kiki no naka no kyocho gaiko 95
33. Katsumi, Usui. 1995. Manshukoku to Kokusai renmei, 193Tokyo: Yoshikawa kobunkan.
34. Junji, Banno. 1997. Nihon seijishi: Meiji, Taisho, senzen Showa, revised edn, 219–20. Tokyo: Hoso daigaku kyoiku shinkokai.
35. Havens, Thomas R. H., 1978. Valley of Darkness: The Japanese People and World War Two, 11New York: Norton.
36. Conroy and Wray (Eds), Pearl Harbor Reexamined, for competing points of view.
37. Seizaburo, Shinobu. 1967. 'From Party Politics to Military Dictatorship'. Developing Economies, IV: 684
38. Minichiello, Sharon A., ed. 1998. Japan's Competing Modernities: Issues in Culture and Democracy 1900-1930, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. For recent examples, see
39. Broszat, Martin. 1990. “ 'A Plea for the Historicization of National Socialism' ”. In Reworking the Past: Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Historians' Debate, Edited by: Baldwin, Peter. 86–87. Boston: Beacon Press.
40. 1973. Japan in Transition: One Hundred Years of Modernization, 72–79. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan.
41. 1975. Japan in Transition: One Hundred Years of Modernization, 72–75. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan. A parallel series of books also produced by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does contain several sentences on the 1930s: see the series
42. 1962. The Japan of Today, 19Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Subsequent editions retain the same form of words. In the 1993 edition (p. 12) there is slight expansion but essentially the same comment on the 1930s
43. Broszat. “ 'A Plea' ”. 87
44. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 1973. Japan in Transition 97 The 1975 edition (pp. 93-94) omits the words 'to a degree perhaps unknown in the history of the world'