Genetic architecture of survival and fitness-related traits in two populations of Atlantic salmon

Heredity

Volumn 111, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 513-519

  Houde, A Ls ^a   Wilson, C C ^b   Neff, B D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Additive genetic effects; Conservation; Life history; Maternal environmental effects; Morphology; Non Additive genetic effects

Indexed keywords

BREEDING; FITNESS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; JUVENILE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; SALMONID; SELECTION; SURVIVAL;

ATLANTIC OCEAN;

SALMO SALAR;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATLANTIC SALMON; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SALMO SALAR; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84887626046     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.74     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Berg OK, Hendry AP, Svendsen B, Bech C, Arnekleiv JV, Lohrmann A (2001). Maternal provisioning of offspring and the use of those resources during ontogeny: variation within and between Atlantic salmon families. Funct Ecol 15: 13-23 (Pubitemid 32152186)
2. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA.
3. Campbell D, Bernatchez L (2004). Generic scan using AFLP markers as a means to assess the role of directional selection in the divergence of sympatric whitefish ecotypes. Mol Biol Evol 21: 945-956 (Pubitemid 38529736)
4. Carson HL (1990). Increased genetic variance after a population bottleneck. Trends Ecol Evol 5: 228-230 (Pubitemid 120036296)
5. Cheverud JM, Rutledge JJ, Atchley WR (1983). Quantitative genetics of development: genetic correlations among age-specific trait values. Evolution 37: 895-905 (Pubitemid 15272177)
6. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada [COSEWIC] (2010). COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (anadromous form) in Canada. Committee in the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Available at. www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status-e.cfm
7. Crawley MJ (2005). Statistics: An Introduction Using R. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, West Sussex, UK.
8. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1995). Dominance variance: associations with selection and fitness. Heredity 75: 530-540 (Pubitemid 26470298)
9. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999). Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270 (Pubitemid 29498795)
10. Dimond P, Smitka J (2005). Evaluation of selected strains of Atlantic salmon as potential candidates for the restoration of Lake Ontario. Trout Unlimited Can Tech Rep ON-012 Available at. www.tucanada.org/reports/ON-012- AtlanticSalmonStrains.pdf
11. Dunfield RW (1985). The Atlantic salmon in the history of North America. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 80: 181 pp.
12. Evans ML, Neff BD, Heath DD (2010). Quantitative genetic and translocation experiments reveal genotype-by-environment effects on juvenile life-history traits in two populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). J Evolution Biol 23: 687-698
13. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman: Harlow, Essex, UK.
14. Fox CW, Bush ML, Wallin WG (2003). Maternal age affects offspring lifespan of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Funct Ecol 17: 811-820 (Pubitemid 38042928)
15. Garcia de Leaniz CG, Fleming IA, Einum S, Verspoor E, Jordan WC, Consuegra S et al. (2007). A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation. Biol Rev 82: 173-211 (Pubitemid 46587938)
16. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 230-241 (Pubitemid 34270584)
17. Koskinen MT, Haugen TO, Primmer CR (2002). Contemporary fisherian life history evolution in small salmonid populations. Nature 419: 826-830 (Pubitemid 35238566)
18. Kruuk LEB, Slate J, Wilson AJ (2008). New answers for old questions: the evolutionary quantitative genetics of wild animal populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39: 525-548
19. Lindholm AK, Hunt J, Brooks R (2006). Where do all the maternal effects go? Variation in offspring body size through ontogeny in the live-bearing fish Poecilia parae. Biol Lett 2: 586-589 (Pubitemid 44935438)
20. Lynch CB (1994). Evolutionary inferences from genetic analysis of cold adaptation in laboratory and wild populations of the house mouse, Mus domesticus. In: Boake CRB (ed) Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
21. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA.
22. Metcalfe NB, Thorpe JE (1992). Early predictors of life history events: the link between first feeding date, dominance and seaward migration in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. J Fish Biol 41: 93-99 (Pubitemid 24406403)
23. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998). The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 403-407 (Pubitemid 28430680)
24. Neff BD, Fraser BA (2010). A program to compare genetic differentiation statistics across loci using resampling of individuals and loci. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 546-550
25. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2008). Mate choice for non-Additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox. J Theor Biol 254: 147-155
26. Neff BD, Garner SR, Pitcher TE (2011). Conservation and enhancement of wild fish populations: preserving genetic fitness versus genetic diversity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68: 1149-1154
27. Pakkasmaa S, Peuhkuri N, Laurila A, Hirvonen H, Ranta E (2001). Female and male contribution to egg size in salmonids. Evol Ecol 15: 143-153 (Pubitemid 34140054)
28. Pitcher TE, Neff BD (2006). MHC class IIB alleles contribute to both additive and nonadditive genetic effects on survival in Chinook salmon. Mol Ecol 15: 2357-2365 (Pubitemid 44050708)
29. Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho JS (2009). The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice. Am Nat 174: 741-752
30. Qvarnstrom A, Price TD (2001). Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 95-100 (Pubitemid 32126268)
31. Rasanen K, Kruuk LEB (2007). Maternal effects and evolution at ecological time-scales. Funct Ecol 21: 408-421 (Pubitemid 46805016)
32. Roff DA, Emerson K (2006). Epistasis and dominance: evidence for differential effects in life-history versus morphological traits. Evolution 60: 1981-1990 (Pubitemid 44808209)
33. Schluter D, Clifford EA, Nemethy M, McKinnon JS (2004). Parallel evolution and inheritance of quantitative traits. Am Nat 163: 809-822 (Pubitemid 38852136)
34. Schumer M, Krishnakant K, Renn SCP (2011). Comparative gene expression profiles for highly similar aggressive phenotypes in male and female cichlid fishes (Julidochromis). J Exp Biol 214: 3269-3278
35. Turner TL, Bourne EC, Von Wettberg EJ, Hu TT, Nuzhdin SV (2010). Population resequencing reveals local adaptation of Arabidopsis lyrata to serpentine soils. Nat Genet 42: 260-263
36. Willis JH, Orr HA (1993). Increased heritable variation following population bottlenecks: the role of dominance. Evolution 47: 949-957
37. Wilson AJ, Reale D (2006). Ontogeny of additive and maternal genetic effects: lessons from domestic mammals. Am Nat 167: E23-E38. (Pubitemid 351175251)