Extracting cortical current dipoles from MEG recordings

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 220, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 190-196

  Shapira Lots, I ^a   Robinson, S E ^b   Abeles, M ^a,c  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cortex; Current dipoles; Evoked response; MEG; Synthetic aperture magnetometry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MAGNETOMETRY; MENTAL TASK; PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WAVEFORM;

CORTEX; CURRENT-DIPOLES; EVOKED-RESPONSE; MEG; SYNTHETIC-APERTURE-MAGNETOMETRY;

BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

EID: 84887606642     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.04.024     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Dalal S., Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S. Modified beamformers for coherent source region suppression. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006, 53(7):1357-1363.
2. Haueisen J., Ramon C., Eiselt M., Nowak H. Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997, 44:727-735.
3. Haueisen J., Tuch D.S., Ramon C., Schimpf P.H., Wedeen V.J., George J.S., Belliveau J.W. The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 2002, 15:159-166.
4. Kopell N., Whittington M.A., Kramer M.A. Neuronal assembly dynamics in the beta1 frequency range permits short-term memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:3779-3784.
5. Moiseev A., Gaspar J.M., Schneider J.A., Herdman A.T. Application of multi-source minimum variance beamformers for reconstruction of correlated neural activity. Neuroimage 2011, 58:481-596.
6. Nolte G. The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:3637-3652.
7. Robinson S.E., Vrba J. Functional neuroimaging by synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM). Rec Adv Biomag 1999, 302-305.
8. Robinson S.E. Localization of event related activity by SAM (erf). Int Conf Biomag 2004, 583-584.
9. Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S. Adaptive spatial filters for electromagnetic brain imaging 2008, Springer, Berlin, 46-47, 149-151, 228-230. second ed.
10. Sharon D., Hämäläinen M.S., Tootell R.B., Halgren E., Belliveau J.W. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally-stimulated visual cortex. Neuroimage 2007, 36(4):1225-1235.
11. Tal I., Abeles M. Cleaning MEG artifacts using external cues. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2013, 217(July (1-2)):31-38. ISSN 0165-0270, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.04.002.