Quantification of changes in zero valent iron morphology using X-ray computed tomography

Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2344-2351

  Luo, Ping ^a   Bailey, Elizabeth H ^a   Mooney, Sacha J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acidic drainage; Mass balance; Permeable reactive barrier; Pore clogging; Porosity change; Typical groundwater; X ray computer tomography; Zero valent iron

Indexed keywords

ACIDIC DRAINAGE; MASS BALANCE; PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIERS; PORE-CLOGGING; POROSITY CHANGES; X-RAY COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; ZERO-VALENT IRON;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DEIONIZED WATER; GEOCHEMISTRY; GROUNDWATER; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PORE SIZE; X RAYS;

WATER TREATMENT;

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; IRON; LABORATORY METHOD; MASS BALANCE; PERMEABILITY; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; POLLUTION INCIDENCE; POROSITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY; X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY;

GROUND WATER; IRON;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; WATER POLLUTANT;

GROUNDWATER; IRON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84887598765     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60237-X     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Appelo CAJ, Postma D Introduction to Ground water Geochemistry. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution 2005, Balkema Publishers, Leiden. 2nd ed.
2. Atkinson BS, Sparkes DL, Mooney SJ Using selected soil physical properties of seedbeds to predict crop establishment. Soil and Tillage Research 2007, 97(2):218-228.
3. Banks D, Younger PL, Arnesen RT, Iversen ER, Banks SB Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly. Environmental Geology 1997, 32(3):157-174.
4. Bartzas G, Komnitsas K Solid phase studies and geochemical modelling of low-cost permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010, 183(1-3):301-308.
5. 0 barriers to treat acidic leachates. Minerals Engineering 2006, 19(15):505-514.
6. Clement TP RT3DA modular computer code for simulating reactive multi-species transport. In: 3-Dimensional Groundwater Aquifers. NNL-SA-11720 1997, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, DC.
7. Duliu OG Computer axial tomography in geosciences, an overview. Earth-Science Reviews 1999, 48(4):265-281.
8. ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council) Permeable Reactive Barriers: Lessons Learned/New Directions 2005, Technical/Regulatory Guildlines Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Washington, DC, USA.
9. Jeen SW, Gillham RW, Przepiora A Predictions of long-term performance of granular iron permeable reactive barriers, field-scale evaluation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2011, 123(1-2):50-64.
10. Jin suk O, Jeen SW, Gillham RW, Gui L Effects of initial iron corrosion rate on long-term performance of iron permeable reactive barriers: Column experiments and numerical simulation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2009, 103(3-4):145-156.
11. Kamolpornwijit W, Liang L Investigation of gas production and entrapment in granular iron medium. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2006, 82(3-4):338-356.
12. Kamolpornwijit W, Liang L, West OR, Moline GR, Sullivan AB Preferential flow path development and its influence on long-term PRB performance, column study. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2003, 66(3-4):161-178.
13. 0 PRB Fourth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds. Monterey, Calif. 2004, Columbus Battelle Press, Ohio.
14. Lampron KJ, Chiu PC, Cha DK Reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes with elemental iron: the role of microorganisms. Water Research 2001, 35(13):3077-3084.
15. Laxen DPH, Chandler IM Comparison of filtration techniques for size distribution in freshwaters. Analytical Chemistry 1982, 54(8):1350-1355.
16. Lee J, Graettinger AJ, Moylan J, Reeves HW Directed site exploration for permeable reactive barrier design. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 162(1):222-229.
17. Lee TR, Wilkin RT Iron hydroxy carbonate formation in zerovalent iron permeable reactive barriers: Characterization and evaluation of phase stability. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2010, 116(1-4):47-57.
18. Li L, Benson CH Evaluation of five strategies to limit the impact of fouling in permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010, 181(1-3):170-180.
19. Li L, Benson CH, Lawson EM Modeling porosity reductions caused by mineral fouling in continuous-wall permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2006, 83(1-2):89-121.
20. Liang LY, Moline GR, Kamolpornwijit W, West OR Influence of hydrogeochemical processes on zero-valent iron reactive barrier performance: A field investigation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2005, 78(4):291-312.
21. Lide DR CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1999/2000: A Ready-Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data 1999, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
22. Mackenzie PD, Horney DP, Sivavec TM Mineral precipitation and porosity losses in granular iron columns. Journal of Hazardous Materials 1999, 68(1-2):1-17.
23. Mayer KU, Frind EO, Blowes DW Multicomponent reactive transport modeling in variably saturated porous media using a generalized formulation for kinetically controlled reactions. Water Resources Research 2002, 38(9):1174-1195.
24. Mooney SJ Three-dimensional visualization and quantification of soil macroporosity and water flow patterns using computed tomography. Soil Use and Management 2002, 18(2):142-151.
25. Mooney SJ, Morris C A morphological approach to understanding preferential flow using image analysis with dye tracers and X-ray computed tomography. Catena 2008, 73(2):204-211.
26. 0 PRBs. In: Fourth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds 2004, Battelle Press, Monterey, Calif Columbus Ohio.
27. Phillips DH, Watson DB, Roh Y, Gu B Mineralogical characteristics and transformations during long-term operation of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier. Journal of Environmental Quality 2003, 32(6):2033-2045.
28. Reardon EJ Anaerobic corrosion of granular iron: measurement and interpretation of hydrogen evolution rates. Environmental Science and Technology 1995, 29(12):2936-2945.
29. Sass B, Gavaskar A, Yoon W, Reeter C, Drescher E Geochemical factors affecting performance and longevity of permeable reactive barriers. In: Third International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds 2002, Battelle Press, Monterey, Calif Columbus Ohio.
30. US EPA, 2002. Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) Interim Summary Report: PRBs using continuous walls to treat metals. Cost and Performance Report. Technology Innovation Office, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Washington, DC. 20460, USA.
31. Vogan JL, Focht RM, Clark DK, Graham SL Performance evaluation of a permeable reactive barrier for remediation of dissolved chlorinated solvents in groundwater. Journal of Hazardous Materials 1999, 68(1-2):97-108.
32. Walter D, De Man B, Iatrou M, Edic P Future generation CT imaging. Thoracic Surgery Clinics 2004, 14(1):135-149.
33. Wantanaphong J, Mooney SJ, Bailey EH Quantification of pore clogging characteristics in potential permeable reactive barrier (PRB) substrates using image analysis. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2006, 86(3-4):299-320.
34. Wilkin RT, Puls RW Capstone Report on the Application, Monitoring, and Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Groundwater Remediation, vol. 1-Performance Evaluations at Two Sites. EPA/600/R-03/045a 2003, National Risk Management Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 20460. USA.
35. Wilkin RT, Puls RW, Sewell GW Long-term performance of permeable reactive barriers using zero-valent iron: geochemical and microbiological effects. Groundwater 2003, 41(4):493-503.