A study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 623-626

  Ashraf, Alireza ^a,b   Daghaghzadeh, Abbas ^a,c   Naseri, Mahshid ^a,b   Nasiri, Aref ^a,b   Fakheri, Maryam ^a,b  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome; electrodiagnosis; interpolation; nerve conduction velocity

Indexed keywords

ANTIDROMIC STIMULATION; ARTICLE; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOREARM; HAND PALM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATENT PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDIAN MOTOR NERVE ACTION POTENTIAL; MEDIAN NERVE; MEDIAN SENSORY NERVE ACTION POTENTIAL; MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY NERVE CONDUCTION; WRIST;

EID: 84887573313     PISSN: 09722327     EISSN: 19983549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.120495     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chang MH, Liao YC, Lee YC, Hsieh PF, Liu LH. Electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: Which transcarpal conduction technique is best? J. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;26:366-71.
2. Chang MH, Liu LH, Lee YC, Wei SJ, Chiang HL, Hsieh PF. Comparison of sensitivity of transcarpal median motor conduction velocity and conventional conduction techniques in electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:984-91.
3. Lee KY, Lee YJ, Koh SH. Usefulness of the median terminal latency ratio in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:765-9.
4. Chang MH, Wei SJ, Chiang HL, Wang HM, Hsieh PF, Huang SY. Comparison of motor conduction techniques in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 2002;58:1603-7.
5. Meena AK, Srinivasa Rao B, Sailaja S, Mallikarjuna M, Borgohain R. Second lumbrical and interossei latency difference in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:2789-94.
6. Banach M, Slowik A, Szczudlik A. The value of motor latency difference measurements between the second lumbrical muscle and second interosseous muscle in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2002;36:657-67.
7. Perić Z, Sinanović O. Sensory-motor index is useful parameter in electroneurographical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Bosn J. Basic Med Sci 2006;6:23-7.
8. Uzar E, Tamam Y, Acar A, Yucel Y, Palanci Y, Cansever S, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of terminal latency index and residual latency in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2011;15:1078-84.
9. Sheu JJ, Yuan RY, Chiou HY, Hu CJ, Chen WT. Segmental study of the median nerve versus comparative tests in the diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:1249-55.
10. Loong SC, Seah CS. Comparison of median and ulnar sensory nerve action potentials in the diagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1971;34:750-4.
11. Prakash KM, Fook-Chong S, Leoh TH, Dan YF, Nurjannah S, Tan YE, et al. Sensitivities of sensory nerve conduction study parameters in carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23:565-7.
12. Schuhfried O, Vacariu G, Kopf A, Paternostro-Sluga T. Relative slowing of the median antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity to the ring finger in screening for carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Hand Surg Am 2004;29:947-52.
13. Demirci S, Sonel B. Comparison of sensory conduction techniques in the diagnosis of mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Which finger, which test? Rheumatol Int 2004;24:217-20.
14. Scelsa SN, Herskovitz S, Bieri P, Berger AR. Median mixed and sensory nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109:268-73.
15. Ilkhani M, Jahanbakhsh SM, Eghtesadi-Araghi P, Moayyeri A. Accuracy of somatosensory evoked potentials in diagnosis of mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2005;108:40-4.
16. Emad MR, Najafi SH, Sepehrian MH. The effect of provocative tests on electrodiagnosis criteria in clinical carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009;19:1061-3.
17. Bodofsky EB. Diagnosing mild carpal tunnel syndrome with interpolation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2004;44:379-83.
18. Bahrami MH, Rayegani SM, Nouri F. Study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and comparison with midpalm antideromic sensory method. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2009;49:259-62.
19. Bodofsky EB. A mathematical model for peripheral nerve conduction velocity. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2003;43:223-9.
20. Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts M. Electrodiagnostic Medicine, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus, Inc; 2002. p. 176-7.
21. Standring S. Wrist and hand. In: Standring S, editor. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 40th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 878-9.