Rating support interfaces to improve user experience and recommender accuracy

RecSys 2013 - Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 149-156

  Nguyen, Tien T ^a   Kluver, Daniel ^a   Wang, Ting Yu ^a   Hui, Pik Mai ^a   Ekstrand, Michael D ^a   Willemsen, Martijn C ^b   Riedl, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive load; Experimentation; Human factors; Inter face design; Preference elicitation; Recommendation accuracy; User experience

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE LOADS; EXPERIMENTATION; PREFERENCE ELICITATION; RECOMMENDATION ACCURACY; USER EXPERIENCE;

EXPERIMENTS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

RATING;

EID: 84887571088     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2507157.2507188     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. G. Adomavicius, J. Bockstedt, S. Curley, and J. Zhang. Recommender systems, consumer preferences, and anchoring effects. In Decisions@RecSys Workshop, pages 35-42, Chicago, 2011.
2. X. Amatriain, J. M. Pujol, N. Tintarev, and N. Oliver. Rate it again: increasing recommendation accuracy by user re-rating. In In Proc. of RecSys '09, pages 173 { 180, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
3. J. R. Bettman, M. F. Luce, and J. W. Payne. Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3):187-217, Dec. 1998. ArticleType: research-article / Full publication date: December 1998 / Copyright © 1998 Journal of Consumer Research Inc.
4. D. Bollen, M. Graus, and M. C. Willemsen. Remembering the stars?: effect of time on preference retrieval from memory. In In Proc. of RecSys '12, pages 217 { 220, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
5. D. Cosley, S. K. Lam, I. Albert, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users' opinions. In In Proc. of CHI '03, pages 585-592, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.
6. M. D. Ekstrand, M. Ludwig, J. A. Konstan, and J. T. Riedl. Rethinking the recommender research ecosystem: reproducibility, openness, and LensKit. In In Proc. of RecSys '11, pages 133 { 140, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
7. B. Fischhoff. Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? American Psychologist, 46(8):835-847, 1991.
8. F. M. Harper, X. Li, Y. Chen, and J. A. Konstan. An economic model of user rating in an online recommender 7http://www.netixprize.com system. In User Modeling 2005, pages 307-316. Springer, 2005.
9. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1):5-53, 2010.
10. W. Hill, L. Stead, M. Rosenstein, and G. Furnas. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In In Proc. of CHI '95, pages 194-201, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
11. C. K. Hsee. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3):247-257, Sept. 1996.
12. L.-t. Hu and P. Bentler. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1):1-55, 1999.
13. D. Kluver, T. T. Nguyen, M. Ekstrand, S. Sen, and J. Riedl. How many bits per rating? In In Proc. of RecSys '12, pages 99 106, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
14. B. P. Knijnenburg, M. C. Willemsen, Z. Gantner, H. Soncu, and C. Newell. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22(4-5):441{504, Mar. 2012.
15. S. Lichtenstein and P. Slovic. The Construction of Preference. Cambridge University Press, Sept. 2006.
16. S. M. McNee, S. K. Lam, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Interfaces for eliciting new user preferences in recommender systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Corbett, and F. d. Rosis, editors, User Modeling 2003, number 2702 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 178{187. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Jan. 2003.
17. T. Mussweiler. Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3):472-489, 2003.
18. T. T. Nguyen and J. Riedl. Predicting users' preference from tag relevance. User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, UMAP 2013, pages 274{280, 2013.
19. S. Nobarany, L. Oram, V. K. Rajendran, C.-H. Chen, J. McGrenere, and T. Munzner. The design space of opinion measurement interfaces: exploring recall support for rating and ranking. In In Proc. of CHI '12, pages 2035 - 2044, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
20. M. P. O'Mahony, N. J. Hurley, and G. C. Silvestre. Detecting noise in recommender system databases. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, IUI '06, pages 109 - 115, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
21. A. Said, B. J. Jain, S. Narr, and T. Plumbaum. Users and noise: The magic barrier of recommender systems. In UMAP 2012, pages 237-248. Springer, 2012.
22. I. Simonson. Determinants of customers' responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(1):32-45, Jan. 2005.
23. E. I. Sparling and S. Sen. Rating: how difficult is it? In In Proc. of RecSys '11, pages 149 - 156, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
24. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157):1124-1131, Sept. 1974.
25. A. Tversky, S. Sattath, and P. Slovic. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95(3):371{384, 1988.
26. J. Vig, S. Sen, and J. Riedl. The tag genome: Encoding community knowledge to support novel interaction. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst., 2(3):13:1 { 13:44, Sept. 2012.
27. E. U. Weber and E. J. Johnson. Mindful judgment and decision making. In Annual Review of Psychology, volume 60, pages 53{85. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, 2009.