A systematic framework for studying the contribution of F0 and duration to the perception of accented words in Hebrew

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Speech Prosody, SP 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 285-288

  Amir, Noam ^a   Almogi, Bat Chen ^a   Mixdorff, Hansjörg ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b BEUTH UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATEGORICAL PERCEPTION; COMBINED EFFECT; FUJISAKI MODEL; SYSTEMATIC FRAMEWORK;

EID: 84887567468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Cooper, W. E., Eady, S. J. and Mueller P. R. (1985) Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77 (6), 2142-2156.
2. de Jong, K. and Zawaydeh, B. (2002) Comparing stress, lexical focus and segmental focus: Patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 30, 53-75.
3. Eady, S. J. and Cooper, W. E. (1986) Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80 (2), 402-414.
4. Fry, D. B. (1955) Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27 (4), 765-770.
5. Fry, D. B. (1958) Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126-152.
6. Kochanski, G., Grabe, E., Coleman, J. and Rosner, B. (2005) Loudness predicts prominence: Fundamental frequency lends little. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (2), 1038-1054.
7. Mixdorff, H., Amir, N. (2002) The prosody of modern Hebrew - a quantitative study, Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, Aix en Provence.,
8. Tamburini, F. and Caini, C. (2005) An automatic system for detecting prosodic prominence in American English continuous speech. International Journal of Speech Technology, 8, 33-44.