Combined analysis of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment on mortality from hypovolemic shock secondary to obstetric hemorrhage

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages

  El Ayadi, Alison M ^a   Butrick, Elizabeth ^a   Geissler, Jillian ^a   Miller, Suellen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hypovolemic shock; NASG; Non pneumatic anti shock garment; Obstetric hemorrhage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTISHOCK GARMENT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK; MATERNAL MORTALITY; OBSTETRIC HEMORRHAGE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; RISK; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

ADULT; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; FEMALE; GRAVITY SUITS; HUMANS; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING; SHOCK; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887555931     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-208     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lozano R, et al. Progress towards millennium development goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2011, 378(9797):1139-1165. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61337-8, 21937100.
2. et al. Aga Khan University Countdown to 2015: taking stock of maternal, newborn & child survival. Decade Report (2000-2010) 2010, Washington, DC: World Health Organization and UNICEF, Aga Khan University.
3. Khan KS, et al. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006, 367(9516):1066-1074. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9, 16581405.
4. Prendiville WJ, Elbourne D, McDonald S. Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000, 3:CD000007.
5. Derman RJ, et al. Oral misoprostol in preventing postpartum haemorrhage in resource-poor communities: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006, 368(9543):1248-1253. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69522-6, 17027730.
6. Mobeen N, et al. Administration of misoprostol by trained traditional birth attendants to prevent postpartum haemorrhage in homebirths in Pakistan: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 2011, 118(3):353-361. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02807.x, 3041931, 21176086.
7. Ransom EI, Yinger NV. Making motherhood safer: overcoming obstacles on the pathway to care 2002, Washington, D.C: Population Reference Bureau.
8. Miller S, et al. First aid for obstetrical haemorrhage: the pilot study of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) in Egypt. BJOG 2006, 113(4):424-9. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00873.x, 16553654.
9. Miller S, et al. A comparative study of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment for the treatment of obstetric hemorrhage in Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009, 107(2):121-5. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.06.005, 19628207.
10. Miller S, et al. Use of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) to reduce blood loss and time to recovery from shock for women with obstetric haemorrhage in Egypt. Glob Public Health 2007, 2(2):110-24. 10.1080/17441690601012536, 19280394.
11. Miller S, et al. A comparative study of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment for the treatment of obstetric hemorrhage in Egypt. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010, 109:20-24. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.016, 20096836.
12. Miller S, et al. Obstetric hemorrhage and shock management: using the low technology non-pneumatic anti-shock garment in Nigerian and Egyptian tertiary care facilities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010, 10:64. 10.1186/1471-2393-10-64, 2966449, 20955600.
13. Magwali TL, et al. Non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (nasg) for obstetric hemorrhage: harare, zimbabwe 2012, S410. FIGO: Rome, Italy: FIGO XX World Congress.
14. Miller S, El Ayadi A. Meta-analysis of 3,651 women with severe obstetric hemorrhage/hypovolemic shock treated with non-pneumatic anti-shock garment 2012, Rome, Italy: FIGO XX World Congress.
15. Maknikar S, Nanda R, Miller S. NASG reduces mortality in indian women with PPH 2012, S413. FIGO: Rome, Italy: FIGO XX World Congress.
16. Jega F, et al. Co-morbidities and lack of blood negatively affect maternal outcomes of women treated with NASGs in Nigeria 2012, S200. FIGO: Rome, Italy: FIGO XX World Congress.
17. Kausar F, et al. Nurses in low resource settings save mothers' lives with non-pneumatic anti-shock garment. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2012, 37(5):308-16.
18. Turan J, et al. Positive effects of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment on delays in accessing care for postpartum and postabortion hemorrhage in Egypt and Nigeria. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011, 20(1):91-8. 10.1089/jwh.2010.2081, 3052289, 21190486.
19. Ojengbede OA, et al. Assessing the role of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment in reducing mortality from postpartum hemorrhage in Nigeria. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2011, 71(1):66-72. 10.1159/000316053, 21160197.
20. Fathalla MM, et al. Nonatonic obstetric haemorrhage: effectiveness of the nonpneumatic antishock garment in egypt. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011, 2011:179349. 3154575, 21845226.
21. Mourad-Youssif M, et al. Can the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) reduce adverse maternal outcomes from postpartum hemorrhage? Evidence from Egypt and Nigeria. Reprod Health 2010, 7:24. 10.1186/1742-4755-7-24, 2942803, 20809942.
22. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
23. Poole C, Greenland S. Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative. Am J Epidemiol 1999, 150(5):469-475. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010035, 10472946.
24. The Clinicians Ultimate Reference Mean Arterial Pressure 2010, http://www.globalrph.com/map.htm, The Clinicians Ultimate Reference.
25. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986, 7(3):177-88. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2, 3802833.
26. Bowden J, et al. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011, 11:41. 10.1186/1471-2288-11-41, 3102034, 21473747.
27. Huedo-Medina TB, et al. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?. Psychol Methods 2006, 11(2):193-206.