Mixed methods research in music therapy research

Journal of Music Therapy

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 123-148

  Bradt, Joke ^a   Burns, Debra S ^b   Creswell, John W ^c  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Mixed methods research; Music therapy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MUSIC THERAPY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BENCHMARKING; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MUSIC THERAPY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84887547928     PISSN: 00222917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jmt/50.2.123     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barry, P., O'Callaghan, C., Wheeler, B., & Grocke, D. (2010). Music therapy CD creation in pediatric radiation therapy: A mixed methods analysis. Journal of Music Therapy, 48, 233-263.
2. Bednarz, D. (1985). Quantity and quality in evaluation research: A divergent view. Evaluation and Program Planning, 8(4), 289-306.
3. Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Routledge.
4. Carr, C., d'Ardenne, P., Sloboda, A., Scott, C., Wang, D., & Priebe, S. (2012).c Group music therapy for patients with persistent post-traumatic stress disorder - an exploratory randomized controlled trial with mixed methods evaluation. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 85, 179-202.
5. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., Smith, K. C., for the Office of Behavioral Social Sciences Research. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from: http://obssr.od.nih.gov/mixed-methods- research
8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
9. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutman, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
10. Creswell, J., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 612-621.
11. Davis, W. B., Gfeller, K. E., & Thaut, M. H. (2008). An introduction to music therapy theory and practice. Silver Spring, MD: American Music Therapy Association.
12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.
14. Fetters, M., Curry, L., & Creswell, J. W. (in press). Achieving integration in mixed methods research. Health Services Research.
15. Giddings, L. S. (2006). Mixed methods research: Positivism dressed in drag? Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(3), 195-203.
16. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed-methods evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. In New directions for evaluation (Vol. 74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 91-110). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
19. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
20. Guba, E. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialogue (pp. 17-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Johnson, R. B., McGowan, M. W., & Turner, L. A. (2010). Grounded Theory in practice: is it inherently a mixed method? Research in the Schools, 17(2), 65-78.
22. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
23. Kettles, A. M., Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2011). Mixed methods research in mental health nursing, 18, 535-542.
24. Lindenfelser, K. J., Hense, C., & Mcferran, K. (2011). Music therapy in pediatric palliative care: Family-centered care to enhance quality of life. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. doi: 10.1177/ 1049909111429327
25. Maxwell, J. A. (2011). A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford.
27. Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
28. Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
29. Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
30. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Introduction: Putting the MIXED back into quantitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: Moving toward the radical middle. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(3), 192-219.
31. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Paul, J. L. (2005). Introduction to the philosophies of research and criticism in education and the social sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
33. Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Sackett, D. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312, 71-72.
35. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and rocedures for developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
36. Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. (2008). Mixed methodology across disciplines. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 1-5.
37. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods: Contemporary issues in an emerging field. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
40. Vogt, D. S., King, D. W., & King, L. A. (2004). Focus groups in psychological assessment: Enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychological Assessment, 16, 231-243