Psychotherapy in 2022: A delphi poll on its future

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 363-370

  Norcross, John C ^a   Pfund, Rory A ^a   Prochaska, James O ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Delphi poll; Evidence based practice; Future of psychology; Psychologists; Psychotherapy; Theoretical orientations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887539621     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0034633     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ascher, W. (1978). Forecasting. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Boronson, W. (1980). The secret of the Delphi oracle. Next, 1, 50.
3. Dixon, P. (2007). Futurewise: The six faces of global change. London, UK: Profile Books.
4. Donohue, H., Stellefson, M., & Tennat, B. (2012). Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique: Implications for health education researchers. American Journal of Health Education, 43, 38-46. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2012.10599216
5. Ekstein, R. (1972). In quest of the professional self. In A. Burton (Ed.), Twelve therapists: How they live and actualize themselves. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Fish, L. S., & Busby, D. M. (1996). The Delphi method. In D. H. Sprenkle (Ed.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 469-482). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7. James, R. L., & Roberts, M. C. (2009). Future directions in clinical child and adolescent psychology: A Delphi survey. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 1009-1020. doi:10.1002/jclp.20604
8. Johnson, S. S., Paiva, A., Mauriello, L., Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Velier, W. F. (in press). Coaction in multiple behavior change interventions: Consistency across multiple studies on weight management and obesity prevention. Health Psychology.
9. Kazdin, A. E., & Blasé, S. L. (2011). Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 21-37. doi:10.1177/1745691610393527
10. Lesse, S. (1987). Psychotherapy in a changing postindustrial society. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 41, 336-348.
11. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Adison-Wesley.
12. Martino, J. P. (1972). Technological forecasting for decision making. New York, NY: American Elsevier.
13. Neimeyer, G. J., Taylor, J. M., & Rozensky, R. H. (2012). The diminishing durability of knowledge in professional psychology: A Delphi poll of specialties and proficiencies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43, 364-371. doi:10.1037/a0028698
14. Norcross, J. C. (Ed.). (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.001.0001
15. Norcross, J. C., Alford, B. A., & DeMichele, J. T. (1992). The future of psychotherapy: Delphi data and concluding observations. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 29, 150-158. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.29.1.150
16. Norcross, J. C., Hedges, M., & Prochaska, J. O. (2002). The face of 2010: A Delphi poll on the future of psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 316-322. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.33.3.316
17. Norcross, J. C., VandenBos, G. R., & Freedheim, D. K. (Eds.). (2010). History of psychotherapy: Continuity and change (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Parente, R., & Anderson-Parente, J. (2011). A case study of long-term Delphi accuracy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78, 1705-1711. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.005
19. Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (1982). The future of psychotherapy: A Delphi poll. Professional Psychology, 13, 620-627. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.13.5.620
20. Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2013). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Cengage-Brooks/Cole.
21. Rowe, G., Wright, G., & McColl, A. (2005). Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 377-399. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.03.004
22. Silver, N. (2012). The signal and the noise: Why so many predictions fail-but some don't. New York, NY: Penguin.