Integrating life-cycle environmental and economic assessment with transportation and land use planning

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 21, 2013, Pages 12020-12028

  Chester, Mikhail V ^a   Nahlik, Matthew J ^a   Fraser, Andrew M ^a   Kimball, Mindy A ^a   Garikapati, Venu M ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION; BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT; ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOME; HIGH-DENSITY STRUCTURES; INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT;

AIR POLLUTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; COSTS; ECONOMICS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; HOUSING; INVESTMENTS; LAND USE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

LIFE CYCLE;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; INVESTMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING;

ARTICLE; BUILDING; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG; RAILWAY; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; TRAVEL; URBAN AREA; BUILDING MATERIAL; CAR; CITY; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENT; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HOUSING; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POPULATION DENSITY; PROCEDURES; UNITED STATES;

ARIZONA; PHOENIX; UNITED STATES;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ARIZONA; AUTOMOBILES; CARBON DIOXIDE; CITIES; CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; ENVIRONMENT; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HOUSING; HUMANS; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; POPULATION DENSITY; TRANSPORTATION; TRAVEL;

EID: 84887525774     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es402985g     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Chester, M.; Pincetl, S.; Elizabeth, Z.; Eisenstein, W.; Matute, J. Infrastructure and automobile shifts: positioning transit to reduce life-cycle environmental impacts for urban sustainability goals Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8 (1) 015041 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015041
2. Chester, M. V.; Horvath, A. Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains Environ. Res. Lett. 2009, 4 (2) 024008 10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008
3. Norman, J.; MacLean, H. L.; Kennedy, C. A. Comparing high and low residential density: Life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2006, 132 (1) 10-21 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006) 132:1(10)
4. Kimball, M.; Chester, M.; Gino, C.; Reyna, J. Transit-oriented development infill in phoenix can reduce future transportation and land use life-cycle environmental impacts J. Plann. Educ. Res. 2013, 10.1177/ 0739456X13507485
5. Aktas, C. B.; Bilec, M. M. Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results Int. Jo. Life Cycle Assess. 2012, 17 (3) 337-349 10.1007/s11367-011-0363-x
6. Ochsendorf, J.; Norford, L. K.; Brown, D.; Durschlag, H.; Hsu, S. L.; Love, A.; Santero, N.; Swei, O.; Webb, A.; Wildnauer, M. Methods, Impacts, And Opportunities in the Concrete Building Life Cycle; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, 2011.
7. Athena Ecocalculator; Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, 2011.
8. Bare, J. C.; Norris, G. A.; Pennington, D. W.; McKone, T. TRACI: The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts J. Ind. Ecol. 2002, 6 (3-4) 49-78 10.1162/108819802766269539
9. Valley Metro Projects and Planning. http://www.valleymetro.org/metro- projects-planning/
10. City of Mesa Arizona. Mesa, Arizona Form-Based Zoning Code; City of Mesa, Arizona: Mesa, AZ, 2012.
11. City of Phoenix Arizona. Economic Development Strategic Plan, Phoenix City Council Policy Session, February 28, 2012; City of Phoenix: Phoenix, AZ, 2012.
12. Dayal, A. Personal Communication, Project Manager for Valley Metro, September 27, 2012; Phoenix, AZ, 2012.
13. Graves, J. Personal Communication, Project Manager for the Office of Economic Development, Mesa, AZ, October 15, 2012; Mesa, AZ, 2012.
14. Tetreault, C. Personal Communication, Senior Policy Advisor for Sustainability, CIty of Phoenix, October 25, 2012; Phoenix, AZ, 2012.
15. Gehrke, A.; Srivastava, S. Sustainable Land Use and Transportation Strategy Market Study; Maricopa Association of Governments: Phoenix, AZ, 2011; p 59.
16. Maricopa Association of Governments. Minutes of the Maricopa Association of Governments Transportation Review Committee: October 25, 2012; Maricopa Association of Governments: Phoenix, AZ, 2012; pp 1-15.
17. Cervero, R.; Ferrell, C.; Murphy, S. Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review; Transit Cooperative Research Program: Washington, DC, 2002.
18. Cervero, R., Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences, challenges, and prospects; Transportation Research Board, 2004; Vol. 102.
19. Bare, J. TRACI 2.0: The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts 2.0 Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2011, 13 (5) 687-696 10.1007/s10098-010-0338-9
20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2007.
21. United States Environmental Protection Agency The Green Book Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/ greenbk/
22. Frijia, S.; Guhathakurta, S.; Williams, E. Functional unit, technological dynamics, and scaling properties for the life cycle energy of residences Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (3) 1782-1788 10.1021/es202202q
23. Wachs, M. Learning from Los Angeles: Transport, urban form, and air quality Transportation 1993, 20 (4) 329-354 10.1007/BF01100463
24. Center for Transit-Oriented Development. Creating Successful Transit-Oriented Districts in Los Angeles: A Citywide Toolkit for Acheiving Regional Goals; Center for Transit-Oriented Development, 2010.
25. Athena. Athena Impact Estimator for Buildings; Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, 2012.
26. Balboni, B.; Babbitt, C.; Baker, T.; Bastoni, R. A.; Chiang, J. H., RS Means Square Foot Costs 2011; R. S. Means Company, Incorporated, 2011.
27. Lafferty, M. J. Personal Communication, General Contractor, Lafferty Development Inc, September 19, 2012; Phoenix, AZ, 2012.
28. Chester, M.; Horvath, A.; Madanat, S. Parking infrastructure: energy, emissions, and automobile life-cycle environmental accounting Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5 (3) 034001 10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034001
29. Horvath, A. Pavement Life-Cycle Assessment Tool for Environmental and Economic Effects; University of California, Berkeley: Berkeley, CA, 2003.
30. Maricopa County. Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department: Phoenix, AZ, 2013.
31. Sharma, A.; Saxena, A.; Sethi, M.; Shree, V. Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2011, 15 (1) 871-875 10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.008
32. United States Energy Information Administration. Electric Power Monthly Table 5.6.A: Average Retail PRive of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector; United States Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, 2013.
33. United States Census Bureau. American Housing Survey; United States Census Bureau, US Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, 2011.
34. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Analysis of IECC (2003, 2006, 2009) and ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Commercial Energy Code Requirements for Mesa, AZ; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2011.
35. United States Department of Energy Buildings Energy Data Book; United States Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2011.
36. United States Energy Information Administration Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS); US Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2003.
37. Argonne National Laboratory The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) Fuel Cycle Model Version GREET 1 2012 rev2; Argonne National Laboratory, US Department of Energy: Argonne, IL, 2012.
38. Federal Highway Administration. National Household Travel Survey; U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, 2009.
39. Leslie, T. F. Identification and differentiation of urban centers in Phoenix through a multi-criteria kernel-density approach Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2010, 33 (2) 205-235 10.1177/0160017610365538
40. Chatman, D. G. Does TOD Need the T? J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2013, 79 (1) 17-31 10.1080/01944363.2013.791008
41. Cervero, R.; Arrington, G. Vehicle trip reduction impacts of transit-oriented housing J. Public Transp. 2008, 11 (3) 1-17
42. Valley Metro. 2010-2011 Transit On-Board Survey; Valley Metro: Phoenix, AZ, 2011.
43. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates. Crediting Low-Traffic Developments: Adjusting Site-Level Vehicle Trip Generation Using URBEMIS; Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates: San Francisco, CA, 2005.
44. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Manual. 8 th ed.; Institute of Transportation Engineers,.
45. Argonne National Laboratory. The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) Vehicle Cycle Model Version 2 2012 rev1; Argonne National Laboratory, US Department of Energy: Argonne, IL, 2012.
46. Department of Transportation. Federal Register; National Archives and Records Administration: Washington, DC, 2012; Vol. 77, pp 62623-63200.
47. limate Change Advisory Group. Phoenix Climate Change Action Plan Phoenix; Arizona Climate Change Advisory Group: Phoenix, AZ, 2006.
48. Maricopa County. 2008 Maricopa County PM10 Emission Inventory; Maricopa County Air Quality Department: Phoenix, AZ, 2011.
49. Maricopa County. 2005 Periodic Emission Inventory for Ozone Precursors; Maricopa County Air Quality Department: Phoenix, AZ, 2008.
50. Morales, M.; Heaney, J. Predominant commercial sectors in Florida and their water use patterns Fla. Water Resour. J. 2010, 62 (8) 29-34
51. AAA. Your Driving Costs; AAA Association Communication: Heathrow, FL, 2012.
52. United States Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2013 with Projections to 2040; US Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2013.
53. National Research Council. Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use; The National Academies Press, 2010.