Coupling of Boundary Element and Wave Based Methods for the efficient solution of complex multiple scattering problems

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 258, Issue , 2014, Pages 165-184

  Atak, Onur ^a   Bergen, Bart ^a   Huybrechs, Daan ^b   Pluymers, Bert ^a   Desmet, Wim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Department of Computer Science KU Leuven   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Hybrid Boundary Element Wave Based Method; Indirect Variational Boundary Element Method; Multi Level Wave Based Method; Multiple scattering; Trefftz Method; Wave Based Method

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING; MULTIPLE SCATTERING; SAILING VESSELS;

BOUNDARY ELEMENTS; HYBRID BOUNDARY ELEMENT WAVE BASED METHOD; INDIRECT VARIATIONAL BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; MULTI-LEVEL WAVE BASED METHOD; MULTILEVELS; MULTIPLE-SCATTERING; TREFFTZ METHODS; VARIATIONAL BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHODS; WAVE BASED METHOD;

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 84887513465     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.034     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Martin P. Multiple Scattering, Interaction of Time-Harmonic Waves with N Obstacles 2006, Cambridge University Press.
2. Chen J., Chen C., Chen P., Chen I. A semi-analytical approach for radiation and scattering problems with circular boundaries. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2007, 196:2751-2764.
3. Zienkiewicz O., Taylor R. The Finite Element Method - The Three Volume Set 2005, Butterworth-Heinemann. 6th ed.
4. Harari I., Turkel E. Accurate finite difference methods for time-harmonic wave propagation. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 119(2):252-270.
5. Grote M., Kirsch C. Dirichlet-to-Neumann boundary conditions for multiple scattering problems. J. Comput. Phys. 2004, 201:630-650.
6. Acosta S., Villamizar V. Coupling of Dirichlet-to-Neumann boundary condition and finite difference methods in curvilinear coordinates for multiple scattering. J. Comput. Phys. 2010, 229:5498-5517.
7. Bouillard P., Ihlenburg F. Error estimation and adaptivity for the finite element method in acoustics: 2d and 3d applications. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1999, 176:147-163.
8. Marburg S. Six boundary elements per wavelength: is that enough?. J. Comput. Acoust. 2002, 10:25-51.
9. Wu T. Boundary Element Acoustics, Fundamentals and Computer Codes 2000, WIT Press.
10. Banjai L., Sauter S. A refined Galerkin error and stability analysis for highly indefinite variational problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2007, 45:37-53.
11. de Lacerda L.A., Wrobel L.C., Mansur W.J. A dual boundary element formulation for sound propagation around barriers over an impedance plane. J. Sound Vib. 1997, 202(2):235-247.
12. Antonio J., Tadeu A., Mendes P.A. A 2.5d traction boundary element method formulation applied to the study of wave propagation in a fluid layer hosting a thin rigid body. J. Comput. Acoust. 2008, 16(2):177-198.
13. Greengard L., Rokhlin V. A fast algorithm for particle simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 1987, 73(2):325-348.
14. Fischer M., Gauger U., Gaul L. A multipole Galerkin boundary element method for acoustics. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2004, 28(2):155-162.
15. Fairweather G., Karageorghis P.M.A. The method of fundamental solutions for scattering and radiation problems. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2003, 27:759-769.
16. Barnett A., Betcke T. Stability and convergence of the method of fundamental solutions for Helmholtz problems on analytic domains. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227(14):7003-7026.
17. Koopmann G.H., Song L., Fahnline J.B. A method for computing acoustic fields based on the principle of wave superposition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 86:2433-2438.
18. Ochmann M. The full-field equations for acoustic radiation and scattering. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 105(5):2574-2584.
19. Perrey-Debain E., Trevelyan J., Bettess P. Wave boundary elements: a theoretical overview presenting applications in scattering of short waves. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2004, 28:131-141.
20. Desmet W. A wave based prediction technique for coupled vibro-acoustic analysis 1998, PhD thesis 98D12, KU Leuven, division PMA.
21. Trefftz E. Ein gegenstuck zum ritzschen verfahren. Second International Congress on Applied Mechanics 1926, 131-137.
22. Pluymers B., Van Hal B., Vandepitte D., Desmet W. Trefftz-based methods for time-harmonic acoustics. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2007, 14:343-381.
23. Pluymers B., Desmet W., Vandepitte D., Sas P. Application of an efficient wave based prediction technique for the analysis of vibro-acoustic radiation problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2004, 168:353-365.
24. Van Genechten B., Atak O., Bergen B., Deckers E., Jonckheere S., Lee J., Maressa A., Vergote K., Pluymers B., Vandepitte D., Desmet W. An efficient wave based method for solving Helmholtz problems in three-dimensional bounded domains. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2012, 36(1):63-75.
25. Bergen B., Van Genechten B., Vandepitte D., Desmet W. An efficient Trefftz-based method for three-dimensional Helmholtz problems in unbounded domains. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2010, 61(2):155-175.
26. Bergen B., Pluymers B., Van Genechten B., Vandepitte D., Desmet W. A Trefftz based method for solving Helmholtz problems in semi-infinite domains. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2012, 36(1):30-38.
27. Deckers E., Hörlin N.-E., Vandepitte D., Desmet W. A wave based method for the efficient solution of the 2d poroelastic Biot equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2012, 201-204:245-262.
28. Vanmaele C., Vandepitte D., Desmet W. An efficient wave based prediction technique for plate bending vibrations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2007, 196:3178-3189.
29. Van Genechten B., Vandepitte D., Desmet W. A direct hybrid finite element - wave based modelling technique for efficient coupled vibro-acoustic analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2011, 200(5-8):742-764.
30. Van Genechten B., Bergen B., Vandepitte D., Desmet W. A Trefftz-based numerical modelling framework for Helmholtz problems with complex multiple-scatterer configurations. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 229:6623-6643.
31. Hampel S., Langer S., Cisilino A.P. Coupling boundary elements to a raytracing procedure. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2008, 73:427-445.
32. Tadeu A., António J., Castro I. Coupling the BEM/TBEM and the MFS for the numerical simulation of acoustic wave propagation. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2010, 34:405-416.
33. Langer U., Steinbach O. Boundary element tearing and interconnecting methods. Computing 2003, 71:205-228.
34. Steinbach O., Windisch M. Stable boundary element domain decomposition methods for the Helmholtz equation. Numer. Math. 2011, 118(1):171-195.
35. Cheng C., Seybert A., Wu T. A multidomain boundary element solution for silencer and muffler performance prediction. J. Sound Vib. 1991, 151(1):119-129.
36. Herrera I. Boundary Methods: an Algebraic Theory 1984, Pitman Adv. Publ. Program, London.
37. Hamdi M., Ville J. Sound radiations from ducts: Theory and experiment. J. Sound Vib. 1986, 107(2):231-242.
38. Ihlenburg F. Finite Element Analysis of Acoustic Scattering 1998, Springer-Verlag.
39. Huybrechs D., Vandewalle S. An efficient implementation of boundary element methods for computationally expansive Green's functions. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2008, 32:621-632.
40. Wadbro E., Udawalpola R., Berggren M. Shape and topology optimization of an acoustic horn-lens combination. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2010, 234(6):1781-1787.