Pupillary reflex dilatation and analgesia nociception index monitoring to assess the effectiveness of regional anesthesia in children anesthetised with sevoflurane

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1160-1165

  Migeon, Anne ^a   Desgranges, François Pierrick ^a   Chassard, Dominique ^a   Blaise, Benjamin J ^a   De Queiroz, Mathilde ^a   Stewart, Adrienne ^b   Cejka, Jean Christophe ^a   Combet, Sylvie ^a   Rhondali, Ossam ^a  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

child; equipment; monitors; pain; regional anesthesia; sevoflurane

Indexed keywords

ALFENTANIL; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; MEPIVACAINE; NITROUS OXIDE; OXYGEN; ROPIVACAINE; SEVOFLURANE;

ADOLESCENT; ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYDRIASIS; NOCICEPTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; PUPIL REFLEX; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SCHOOL CHILD; SKIN INCISION; TREATMENT FAILURE;

CHILD; EQUIPMENT; MONITORS; PAIN; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SEVOFLURANE;

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHMS; ANESTHESIA, CONDUCTION; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; REFLEX, PUPILLARY; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84887473804     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pan.12243     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ecoffey C, Lacroix F, Giaufré E, et al,. Courrèges P; Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF). Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Pediatr Anesth 2010; 20: 1061-1069.
2. Oberndorfer U, Marhofer P, Bösenberg A, et al,. Ultrasonographic guidance for sciatic and femoral nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 797-801.
3. Chhabra A, Sinha R, Subramaniam R, et al,. Comparison of sub-Tenon's block with i.v. fentanyl for paediatric vitreoretinal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 739-743.
4. Naja Z, Al-Tannir MA, Faysal W, et al,. A comparison of pudendal block vs dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in children: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 802-807.
5. Benarroch EE,. Pain-autonomic interactions: a selective review. Clin Auton Res 2001; 11: 343-349.
6. Mazzeo AT, La Monaca E, Di Leo R, et al,. Heart rate variability: a diagnostic and prognostic tool in anesthesia and intensive care. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 797-811.
7. Jeanne M, Logier R, De Jonckheere J, et al,. Heart rate variability during total intravenous anesthesia: effects of nociception and analgesia. Auton Neurosci 2009; 147: 91-96.
8. Faye PM, De Jonckheere J, Logier R, et al,. Newborn infant pain assessment using heart rate variability analysis. Clin J Pain 2010; 26: 777-782.
9. Logier R, De Jonckheere J, Delecroix M, et al,. Heart rate variability analysis for arterial hypertension etiological diagnosis during surgical procedures under tourniquet. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011; 2011: 3776-3779.
10. Logier R, Jeanne M, De Jonckheere J, et al,. PhysioDoloris: a monitoring device for analgesia/nociception balance evaluation using heart rate variability analysis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010: 1194-1197.
11. Jeanne M, Clément C, De Jonckheere J, et al,. Variations of the analgesia nociception index during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 2012; 26: 289-294.
12. Sabourdin N, Arnaout M, Louvet N, et al,. Pain monitoring in anesthetized children: first assessment of skin conductance and analgesia-nociception index at different infusion rates of remifentanil. Pediatr Anesth 2013; 23: 149-155.
13. Constant I, Nghe MC, Boudet L, et al,. Reflex pupillary dilatation in response to skin incision and alfentanil in children anaesthetized with sevoflurane: a more sensitive measure of noxious stimulation than the commonly used variables. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96: 614-619.
14. Bourgeois E, Sabourdin N, Louvet N, et al,. Minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane inhibiting the reflex pupillary dilatation after noxious stimulation in children and young adults. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 648-654.
15. Larson MD, Sessler DI, Washington DE, et al,. Pupillary response to noxious stimulation during isoflurane and propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 1072-1078.
16. Barvais L, Engelman E, Eba JM, et al,. Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 347-352.
17. Larson MD, Kurz A, Sessler DI, et al,. Alfentanil blocks reflex pupillary dilation in response to noxious stimulation but does not diminish the light reflex. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 849-855.
18. Larson MD, Tayefeh F, Sessler DI, et al,. Sympathetic nervous system does not mediate reflex pupillary dilation during desflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 748-754.
19. Emery J, Ho D, MacKeen L, et al,. Pupillary reflex dilation and skin temperature to assess sensory level during combined general and caudal anesthesia in children. Pediatr Anesth 2004; 14: 768-773.
20. Wodey E, Senhadji L, Pladys P, et al,. The relationship between expired concentration of sevoflurane and sympathovagal tone in children. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 377-382.
21. Constant I, Dubois MC, Piat V, et al,. Changes in electroencephalogram and autonomic cardiovascular activity during induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane compared with halothane in children. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1604-1615.