Group method of data handling to predict scour depth around bridge piers

Neural Computing and Applications

Volumn 23, Issue 7-8, 2013, Pages 2107-2112

  Najafzadeh, Mohammad ^a   Azamathulla, Hazi Mohammad ^b  

^a SHAHID BAHONAR UNIVERSITY OF KERMAN   (Iran)

^b RIVER ENGINEERING AND URBAN DRAINAGE RESEARCH CENTRE REDAC   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Bridge pier; GMDH; Scour depth; Traditional equations

Indexed keywords

EFFECTIVE PARAMETERS; GMDH; GROUP METHOD OF DATA HANDLING; QUADRATIC POLYNOMIAL; SCOUR DEPTH; TRADITIONAL EQUATIONS; TRAINING AND TESTING; WEIGHTING COEFFICIENT;

BRIDGE PIERS; DATA HANDLING; ITERATIVE METHODS;

SCOUR;

EID: 84887473211     PISSN: 09410643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-012-1160-6     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amanifard N, Nariman-Zadeh N, Farahani MH, Khalkhali A (2008) Modelling of multiple short-length-scale stall cells in an axial compressor using evolved GMDH neural networks. J Energy Conserv Manag 49: 2588-2594.
2. Alavi AH, Gandomi AH (2011) Prediction of principal ground-motion parameters using a hybrid method coupling artificial neural networks and simulated annealing. Comput Struct 89(23-24): 2176-2194.
3. Azmathulla HMD, Deo MC, Deolalikar PB (2005) Neural networks for estimation of scour downstream of a ski-jump bucket. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 131(10): 898-908.
4. Azamathulla HMD, Guven A, Demir YK (2011) Linear genetic programming to scour below submerged pipeline. Ocean Eng 38(8-9): 995-1000.
5. Bateni SM, Borghei SM, Jeng D-S (2006) Neural network and neuro-fuzzy assessments for scour depth around bridge piers. Eng Appl Artif Intell 20: 401-414.
6. Dey S, Bose SK, Sastry GLN (1995) Clear-water scour at circular piers. J Hydraul Eng 121(12): 869-876.
7. Ettema R (1990) Design method for local scour at bridge pier. Proc J Hydraul Eng 116(10): 1290-1292.
8. Farlow SJ (ed) (1984) Self-organizing method in modeling: GMDH type algorithm. Marcel Dekker Inc., Newyork.
9. Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2011) Applications of computational intelligence in behavior simulation of concrete materials. In: XS Yang, S Koziel (eds) Chapter 9 in computational optimization and applications in engineering and industry, Springer SCI, 359, pp 221-243.
10. Guven A, Gunal M (2008) Prediction of scour downstream of grade-control structures using neural networks. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 134(11): 1656-1660.
11. Iba H, de Garis H (1996) Extending genetic programming with recombinative guidance. In: Angeline P, Kinnear K (eds) Advances in genetic programming 2. MIT Press, Cambridge.
12. Ivahnenko AG (1971) Polynomial theory of complex systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
13. Ivakhnenko AG, Ivakhnenko GA (2000) Problems of further development of the group method of data handling algorithms. Part 1. Pattern Recogn Image Anal 110: 187-194.
14. Johnson PA (1992) Reliability-based pier scour engineering. J Hydraul Eng 118(10): 1344-1357.
15. Kalantary F, Ardalan H, Nariman-Zadeh N (2009) An investigation on the Su -NSPT correlation using GMDH type neural networks and genetic algorithms. Eng Geol 104(1-2): 144-155.
16. Kazeminezhad MH, Etemad-Shahidi A, Yeganeh Bakhtiary A (2010) An alternative approach for investigation of the wave-induced scour around pipelines. J Hydroinform 12(1): 51-65.
17. Khan M, Azamathulla HMD, Tufail M, Ghani AA (2011) Bridge pier scour prediction by gene expression programming. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Water Management, Issue WM1, pp 1-13.
18. Landers MN, Mueller DS (1999) U. S. Geological survey field measurements of pier scour. In: Compendium of papers on ASCE water resources engineering conferences 1991 to 1998, pp 585-607.
19. Laursen EM, Toch A (1956) Scour around bridge piers and abutments. Iowa highway research board, Ames, IA, Bulletin 4.
20. Mehrara M, Moeini A, Ahrari M, Erfanifard A (2009) Investigating the efficiency in oil futures market based on GMDH approach. Expert Syst Appl 36(4): 7479-7483.
21. Melville BW, Sutherland AJ (1988) Design method for local scour abridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 114(10): 1210-1226.
22. Mia F, Nago H (2003) Design method of time-dependent local scour at circular bridge pier. J Hydraul Eng 129(6): 420-427.
23. Mohammed TH, Noor MJMM, Ghazali AH, Huat BBK (2005) Validation of some bridge pier scour formulae using field and laboratory data. Am J Environ Sci 1(2): 119-125.
24. Muzzammil M, Ayyub M (2010) ANFIS-based approach for scour depth prediction at piers in non-uniform sediments. J Hydroinform 12(3): 303-317.
25. Najafzadeh M, Barani Gh-A (2011) Comparison of group method of data handling based genetic programming and back propagation systems to predict scour depth around bridge piers. Sci Iran Trans A Civ Eng 18(6): 1207-1213.
26. Oh S-K, Pedrycz W (2006) Genetic optimization-driven multi-layer hybrid fuzzy neural networks. Simul Model Pract Theory 14: 597-613.
27. Oh S-K, Pedrycz W, Park H-S (2005) Multi-layer hybrid fuzzy polynomial neural networks: a design in the framework of computational intelligence. Neurocomputing 64: 397-431.
28. Onwubolu GC (2008) Design of hybrid differential evolution and group method in data handling networks for modeling and prediction. Inf Sci 178: 3618-3634.
29. Richardson EV, Davis SR (2001) Evaluating scour at bridges, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18 (HEC-18). US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway.
30. Sanchez E, Shibata T, Zadeh LA (1997) Genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic systems. World Scientific.
31. Sakaguchi A, Yamamoto TA (2000) GMDH network using back propagation and its application to a controller design. J IEEE 4: 2691-2697.
32. Shen HW, Schneider VR, Karaki S (1969) Local scour around bridge piers. J Hyd Div 95(6): 1919-1940.
33. Sheppard DM, Odeh M, Glasser T (2004) Large scale clear-water local pier scour experiments. J Hydraul Eng 130(10): 957-963.
34. Sheppard DM, Miller W (2006) Live-bed local pier scour experiments. J Hydraul Eng 132(7): 635-642.
35. Srinivasan D (2008) Energy demand prediction using GMDH networks. Neuro-Computing 72(1-3): 625-629.
36. Witczak M, Korbicz J, Mrugalski M, Patton R (2006) A GMDH neural network-based approach to robust fault diagnosis: application to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. J Control Eng Pract 14(6): 671-683.