Human identification using facial comparative descriptions

Proceedings - 2013 International Conference on Biometrics, ICB 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Reid, Daniel A ^a   Nixon, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRIC FEATURES; CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION; ELO RATING SYSTEMS; FACIAL IDENTIFICATION; HUMAN DESCRIPTIONS; HUMAN IDENTIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION ACCURACY; SOFT BIOMETRICS;

BIOMETRICS;

EID: 84887469050     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICB.2013.6612962     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. G. B. Chapman and E. J. Johnson. Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, pages 120-138, 2002.
2. A. Dantcheva, J. Dugelay, and P. Elia. Soft biometrics systems: Reliability and asymptotic bounds. In BTAS, pages 1-6, 2010.
3. H. D. Ellis. Face recall: A psychological perspective. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications; Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 1986.
4. C. D. Frowd, P. J. B. Hancock, V. Bruce, A. H. McIntyre, M. Pitchford, R. Atkins, A. Webster, J. Pollard, B. Hunt, E. Price, S. Morgan, A. Stoika, R. Dughila, S. Maftei, and G. Sendrea. Giving Crime the 'evo': Catching Criminals Using EvoFIT Facial Composites. In International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies (EST), pages 36-43, 2010.
5. C. D. Frowd, P. J. B. Hancock, and D. Carson. EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 1(1):19-39, July 2004.
6. J. Kabzińska and A. Niedźwieńska. The effect of providing descriptions of perpetrators on their identification by eyewitnesses and investigative bodies. Problems of Forensic Sciences, (84): 326-335, 2011.
7. L. L. Kuehn. Looking down a gun barrel: Person perception and violent crime. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39(3):1159-1164, 1974.
8. K. R. Laughery and R. H. Fowler. Sketch artist and Identi-kit procedures for recalling faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(3):307, 1980.
9. C. A. Meissner, S. L. Sporer, and J. W. Schooler. Person descriptions as eyewitness evidence. Handbook of eyewitness psychology, 2:3-34, 2007.
10. National Policing Improvement Agency. PNC User Manual, Volume 2, Nov. 2009.
11. D. A. Reid and M. S. Nixon. Using Comparative Human Descriptions for Soft Biometrics. In International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB), pages 1-6, 2011.
12. D. A. Reid, S. Samangooei, C. Chen, M. S. Nixon, and A. Ross. Soft Biometrics for Surveillance: An Overview. In Handbook of statistics, volume 31. Elsevier, In Press.
13. S. Samangooei and M. S. Nixon. Performing Content-based Retrieval of Humans using Gait Biometrics. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 49(1):195-212, 2010.
14. J. Shutler, M. Grant, M. S. Nixon, and J. N. Carter. On a large sequence-based human gait database. In Proc RASC, pages 66-72. Springer Verlag, 2002.
15. S. L. Sporer. An archival analysis of person descriptions. In Biennial Meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society in San Diego, California, 1992.
16. S. L. Sporer. Person descriptions as retrieval cues: Do they really help? Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(6):591-609, Dec. 2007.
17. P. J. Van Koppen and S. K. Lochun. Portraying perpetrators; the validity of offender descriptions by witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21(6):661-685, 1997.
18. M. S. Wogalter. Effects of Post-exposure Description and Imaging on Subsequent Face Recognition Performance. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, volume 35. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1991.