Crime prevention v planning: Section 17 of the crime and disorder act 1998. is it a material consideration?

Crime Prevention and Community Safety

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 43-48

  Moss, Kate ^a  

^a STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crime and Disorder Act 1998 Section 17; crime prevention; local authorities: Human Rights Act 1998; Planning Inspectorate

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887458169     PISSN: 14603780     EISSN: 17434629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140088     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Kate Moss is a Senior Lecturer in Law and Criminology at Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 2DF.
2. Moss, K. and Pease, K. (1999) Crime and Disorder Act 1998: Section 17 A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal. Vol. 1, No. 4, pp 15-19.
3. Home Office (1994) Planning Out Crime. Circular No. 5. London: Home Office.
4. Aquariam Entertainments Ltd v Brighton and Hove Council. Appeal Ref: T/APP/Q1445/A/99/1025514/P2, 15-18 and 22 February 2000.
5. Aquariam Entertainments Ltd v Brighton and Hove Council. Costs decision: Appeal Ref: T/APP/Q1445/A/99/1025514/P2, 17 March 2000, pp 1-2.
6. Stringer v Minister of Housing and Local Government [1970] 1 WLR 1281.
7. Ladbroke Rentals Ltd v Secretary of State [1981] JPL 454.
8. Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223.
9. Warrant Investment Ltd v Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council. Appeal Ref: T/APP/P3420/A/00/1036269/P2, 3 May 2000.
10. Castledrive v Brighton and Hove Council. Appeal Ref: T/APP/Q1445/A/99/ 1017629/P2, 11 July 2000.
11. Tourish v Bexley London Borough Council. Appeal Ref: APP/D5120/A/99/ 1032454, 10 Feb 2000.