Intonation as a cue to turn management in telephone and face-to-face interactions

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Speech Prosody, SP 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 485-488

  Oliveira Jr , Miguel ^a   Freitas, Tiago ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b ILTEC   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TELEPHONE;

FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION; MELODIC INFORMATION; TELEPHONE SPEECH;

TELEPHONE SETS;

EID: 84887455373     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Sacks, H.; Schegloff, E.; Jefferson, G., 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
2. Duncan, S. Jr., 1972. Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283-292.
3. Walker, G., 2004. The phonetic design of turn endings, beginnings, and continuations in conversation. PhD thesis, University of York.
4. Wiemann, J.; Knapp, M., 1975. Turn-Taking in conversations. Journal of Communication, 25, 75-92.
5. Goodwin, C., 1981. Conversational organization: interaction between hearers and speakers. New York: Academic Press.
6. Schaffer, D., 1983. The role of intonation as a cue to turn taking in conversation. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 243-257.
7. Hidalgo-Navarro, A., 1999. Procedures de demarcation dans l'alternance des prises de parole: Interaction, syntaxe et prosodie. Faits de Langues: Revue de Linguistique, 13, 110-124.
8. Auer, P., 1996. On the prosody and syntax of turncontinuations. In Prosody in Conversation., E. Couper- Kuhlen, M. Selting (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57-100.
9. Selting, M., 1996. On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association, 6(3), 371-388.
10. Schegloff, E., 1998. Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41(3-4), 235-263.
11. Mindt, I., 1999. Prosodic cues at speaker turns. Papers from the Twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20), Freiburg im Breisgau. Rodopi: Amsterdam.
12. Sá, P.; Cunha, D.; Lima, A.; Oliveira, M. (eds.), 1997. A linguagem falada culta na cidade do Recife: diálogo entre informante e documentador. Editora Universitária: Recife.
13. Boersma, P., Weenink, D., 2003. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.1.5). http://www.praat.org/
14. Nooteboom, S., Kruyt, J., 1986. Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: an experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82(5), 1512-1524.
15. Sluijter, A., Terken, J., 1993. Beyond sentence prosody: paragraph intonation in Dutch. Phonetica, 50, 180-188.
16. van Donzel, M., 1999. Prosodic aspects of information structure in discourse. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
17. Carletta, J., 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistics. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249-254.
18. Caspers, J., 1998. Who's next? The melodic marking of question vs continuation in Dutch. Language and Speech, 41, 375-398.
19. Gunter, R., 1972. Intonation and relevance. In Intonation: Selected Readings. D. Bolinger (ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin: 194-215.
20. Schegloff, E., 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of"uh huh" and other things that come between sentences. In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, D. Tannen (ed.). Washington: Georgetown University Press: 71-93.
21. Erickson, F., 1982. Money tree, lasagna bush, salt and pepper: social construction of topical cohesion in a conversation among Italian-Americans. In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, D. Tannen (ed.). Washington: Georgetown University Press: 43-70.