A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Lin, M I ^a   Shen, Y W ^a,b   Huang, H L ^a   Hsu, J T ^a   Fuh, L J ^a,b  

^a CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

alveolar bone loss; internal Morse taper; internal octagon; peri implant crestal bone change dental implant abutment design; radiology

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL ABUTMENT; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERNAL MORSE TAPER; INTERNAL OCTAGON; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERI-IMPLANT CRESTAL BONE CHANGE DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; WOUND HEALING;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; INTERNAL MORSE TAPER; INTERNAL OCTAGON; PERI-IMPLANT CRESTAL BONE CHANGE DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; RADIOLOGY;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BITE FORCE; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84887446511     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: 15440591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034513510322     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Effects of different impalnt surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alternations: a review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 ; 20: 207-215
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986 ; 1: 11-25
3. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 ; 15: 413-420
4. Baffone GM, Botticelli D, Pantani F, Cardoso LC, Schweikert MT, Lang NP. Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: an experimental study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 ; 22: 438-444
5. Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 ; 22: 109-117
6. Chu CM, Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation. J Periodontol. 2012 ; 83: 111-118
7. Cranin AN, DeGrado J, Kaufman M, Baraoidan M, DiGregorio R, Batgitis G, et al. Evaluation of the Periotest as a diagnostic tool for dental implants. J Oral Implantol. 1998 ; 24: 139-146
8. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 ; 13: 30-37
9. Enkling N, Johren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 ; 22: 1185-1192
10. Heckmann SM, Winter W, Meyer M, Weber HP, Wichmann MG. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area: part 2. A methodical study using five types of attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 ; 12: 640-647
11. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 ; 12: 559-571
12. Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 ; 17: 8-18
13. Koo KT, Lee EJ, Kim JY, Seol YJ, Han JS, Kim TI, et al. The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis. J Periodontol. 2011 ; 83: 1104-1109
14. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 ; 26: 9-17
15. Linkevicius T, Apse P. Biologic width around implants: an evidence-based review. Stomatologija. 2008 ; 10: 27-35
16. Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 ; 33: 75-78
17. Malevez C, Hermans M, Daelemans P. Marginal bone levels at Branemark system implants used for single tooth restoration: the influence of implant design and anatomical region. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 ; 7: 162-169
18. Nishioka RS, de Vasconcellos LG, de Melo Nishioka GN. Comparative strain gauge analysis of external and internal hexagon, Morse taper, and influence of straight and offset implant configuration. Implant Dent. 2011 ; 20: e24 - e32
19. Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science?. J Periodontol. 2002 ; 73: 322-333
20. Pessoa RS, Muraru L, Júnior EM, Vaz LG, Sloten JV, Duyck J, et al. Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants: CT-based nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 ; 12: 219-234
21. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 ; 16: 486-494
22. Pontes AE, Ribeiro FS, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Cirelli JA, Marcantonio E. Biologic width changes around loaded implants inserted in different levels in relation to crestal bone: histometric evaluation in canine mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2008 ; 19: 483-490
23. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992 ; 3: 104-111
24. Sadowsky SJ. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: design considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 ; 78: 28-33
25. Streckbein P, Streckbein RG, Wilbrand JF, Malik CY, Schaaf H, Howaldt HP, et al. Non-linear 3D evaluation of different oral implant-abutment connections. J Dent Res. 2012 ; 91: 1184-1189
26. Veis A, Parissis N, Tsirlis A, Papadeli C, Marinis G, Zogakis A. Evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss using modified abutment connections at various crestal level placements. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 ; 30: 609-617
27. Vidyasagar L, Apse P. Dental implant design and biological effects on bone-implant interface. Baltic Dent Maxillofac J. 2004 ; 6: 51-54
28. Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bell M, Bosco AF, de Melo LG, Richter EJ. Influence of microgap location and configuration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 ; 19: 1141-1147
29. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol. 2000 ; 5: 22-31
30. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986 ; 42: 121-130