Producing a landslide inventory map using pixel-based and object-oriented approaches optimized by Taguchi method

Geomorphology

Volumn 204, Issue , 2014, Pages 646-656

  Moosavi, Vahid ^a   Talebi, Ali ^a   Shirmohammadi, Bagher ^b  

^a YAZD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Landslide inventory; Object oriented classification; Optimization; Pixel based classification; Taguchi method

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSLIDE; OPTIMIZATION; PIXEL; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; MASS MOVEMENT; NATURAL HAZARD; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

EID: 84887404317     PISSN: 0169555X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Ablay G., Hürliman M. Evolution of the north flank of Tenerife by recurrent giant landslides. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2000, 103:135-159.
2. Akgün A., Dag S., Bulut F. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ. Geol. 2008, 54:1127-1143.
3. Alavi M. Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold and thrust belt of Iran and its proforeland evolution. Am. J. Sci. 2004, 3004:1-20.
4. Ayenew T., Barbieri G. Inventory of landslides and susceptibility mapping in the Dessie area, northern Ethiopia. Eng. Geol. 2005, 77:1-15.
5. Barlow J., Franklin S., Martin Y. High spatial resolution satellite imagery, DEM derivatives, and image segmentation for the detection of mass wasting processes. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 2006, 72(6):687-692.
6. Belousov A.I., Verzakov S.A., Von Frese J. Applicational aspects of support vector machines. J. Chemom. 2002, 16:482-489.
7. Benz U., Hofmann P., Willhauck G., Lingenfelder I., Heynen M. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 2004, 58:239-258.
8. Blahut J., van Weste C.J., Sterlacchini S. Analysis of landslide inventories for accurate prediction of debris-flow source areas. Geomorphology 2010, 119:36-51.
9. Blaschke T. Towards a framework for change detection based on image objects. Remote Sensing and GIS for Environmental Studies 2005, 1-9. Goettinger Geographische Abhandlungen, Goettingen, Germany. S. Erasmi, B. Cyffka, M. Kappas (Eds.).
10. Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2010, 65(1):2-16.
11. Booth A.M., Roering J.J., Perron T. Automated landslide mapping using spectral analysis and high-resolution topographic data: Puget Sound lowlands, Washington, and Portland Hills, Oregon. Geomorphology 2009, 109:132-147.
12. Bradley J.V. Distribution-Free Statistical Tests 1968, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (388 pp.).
13. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45:5-32.
14. Brenning A. Benchmarking classifiers to optimally integrate terrain analysis and multispectral remote sensing in automatic rock glacier detection. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113(1):239-247.
15. Brückl E.P. Cause-effect models of large landslides. Nat. Hazards 2001, 23:291-314.
16. Carreiras J.M.B., Pereira J.M.C., Campagnolo M.L., Shimabukuro Y.E. Assessing the extent of agriculture/pasture and secondary succession forest in the Brazilian Legal Amazon using SPOT VEGETATION data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 101(3):283-298.
17. Castillejo-González I.L., López-Granados F., García-Ferrer A., Peña-Barragán J.M., Jurado-Expósito M., de la Orden M.S. Object- and pixel-based analysis for mapping crops and their agro-environmental associated measures using QuickBird imagery. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2009, 68(2):207-215.
18. Chandra M., Moreira A., Keydel W. AMPER: network on applied multiparameter environmental remote sensing. Proceedings of the IGARSS 2005 Symposium, Seoul, Korea 2005.
19. Chou C.S., Ho C.Y., Huang C.I. The optimum conditions for combination of magnetic particles driven by a rotating magnetic field using the Taguchi method. Adv. Powder Technol. 2009, 20:55-61.
20. Cruden D.M., Varnes D.J. Landslide types and processes. Special Report 247 1996, 36-75. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. 0360-859X. A.K. Turner, R.L. Schuster (Eds.).
21. Dragut L., Blaschke T. Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis. Geomorphology 2006, 81:330-344.
22. Dragut L., Eisank C. Object representations at multiple scales from digital elevation models. Geomorphology 2011, 129:183-189.
23. Duman T.Y., Can T., Emre O., Kecer M., Dogan A., Ates S., Durmaz S. Landslide inventory of northwestern Anatolia, Turkey. Eng. Geol. 2005, 77:99-114.
24. Elachi Ch., van Zyl J. Introduction to the Physics and Techniques of Remote Sensing 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Jahr, (552 pp.).
25. Espindola G.M., Camara G., Reis I.A., Bins L.S., Monteiro A.M. Parameter selection for region-growing image segmentation algorithms using spatial autocorrelation. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27:3035-3040.
26. Foody G.M. Thematic map comparison: evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 2004, 70:627-633.
27. Frizzelle B.G., Moody A. Mapping continuous distributions of land cover - a comparison of maximum likelihood estimation and artificial neural networks. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2001, 67693-67705. (Vol.).
28. Galli M., Ardizzone F., Cardinali M., Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P. Comparing landslide inventory maps. Geomorphology 2008, 94:268-289.
29. GeoEye, Inc. GeoEye Product Guide (accessed 03.02.12). http://www.geoeye.com/CorpSite/assets/docs/brochures/GeoEyeProductGuide.pdf.
30. Gislason P.O., Benediktsson J.A., Sveinsson J.R. Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 2006, 27(4):294-300.
31. Harp E.L., Keefer D.K., Sat H.P., Yagi H. Landslide inventories: the essential part of seismic landslide hazard analyses. Eng. Geol. 2011, 122:9-21.
32. Hervas J., Bobrowsky P. Mapping: inventories, susceptibility, hazard and risk. Landslides - Disaster Risk Reduction 2009, 321-349. Springer, Berlin. K. Sassa, P. Canuti (Eds.).
33. Heshmati M., Arifin A., Shamshuddin J., Majid N.M., Ghaituri M. Factors affecting landslides occurrence in agro-ecological zones in the Merek catchment, Iran. J. Arid Environ. 2011, 75:1072-1082.
34. Hopfield J.J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1982, 79:2554-2558.
35. Hsu C.W., Chang C.C., Lin C.J. A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification 2007, National Taiwan University, (URL http://ntu.csie.org/cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf).
36. Huang C., Davis L.S., Townshend J.R.G. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2002, 23(4):725-749.
37. Inglès J., Darrozes J., Soula J.C. Effects of vertical component of ground shaking on earthquake-induced landslide displacements using generalized Newmark's analysis. Eng. Geol. 2006, 86:134-147.
38. Jobin B., Labrecque S., Grenier M., Falardeau G. Object-based classification as an alternative approach to the traditional pixel-based classification to identify potential habitat of the Grasshopper Sparrow. Environ. Manag. 2008, 41:20-31.
39. Karimibavandpoor, A., Hajihosaini, A., Shahandi, M., 1999. Geological Map of Kermanshah, Iran (1:100,000, Series: 5458). Geological Survey Service Press, Tehran, Iran.
40. Kerle N., de Leeuw J. Reviving legacy population maps with object-oriented image processing techniques. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2009, 47:2392-2402.
41. Koch B., Jochum M., Ivitis E., Dees M. Pixelbasierte Klassifizierung im Vergleich and zur Erganzung zum objektbasierten Verfahren. Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation 2003, 3:195-204.
42. Laliberte A.S., Rango A., Havstad K.M., Paris J.F., Beck R.F., McNeely R., Gonzalez A.L. Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 93(1-2):198-210.
43. Laliberte A.S., Koppa J.S., Fredrickson E.L., Rango A. Comparison of nearest neighbor and rule-based decision tree classification in an object-oriented environment. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, July 31-August 4, Denver, Co 2006.
44. Langanke T., Blaschke T., Lang S. An object-based GIS/remote sensing approach supporting monitoring tasks in European-wide nature conservation. Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Earth Observation, First Mediterranean Conference on Earth Observation (Remote Sensing), 21-23 April, Belgrade, Serbia 2004, 245-252.
45. Lillesand T., Kiefer R.W., Chipman J. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation 2007, Wiley, London, (197 pp.).
46. Linke J., McDermid G.J. A conceptual model for multi-temporal landscape monitoring in an object-based environment. IEEE J. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2011, 4(2):265-271.
47. Marjanović M., Kovačević M., Bajat B., Voženílek V. Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm. Eng. Geol. 2011, 123:225-234.
48. Martha T.R., Kerle N., Jetten V., Van Westen C.J., Kumar K.V. Characterising spectral, spatial and morphometric properties of landslides for semi-automatic detection using object-oriented methods. Geomorphology 2010, 116(1-2):24-36.
49. Möller M., Lymburner L., Volk M. The comparison index: a tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2007, 9(3):311-321.
50. Moon V., Simpson C.J. Large-scale mass wasting in ancient volcanic material. Eng. Geol. 2002, 64:41-64.
51. Myint S.W., Gober P., Brazel A., Grossman-Clarke S., Weng Q. Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115(5):1145-1161.
52. Navulur K. Multispectral image analysis using the object-oriented Paradigm 2007, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Taiwan, (206 pp.).
53. Oh H.J., Park N.W., Lee S.S., Lee S. Extraction of landslide-related factors from ASTER imagery and its application to landslide susceptibility mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2012, 33(10):3211-3231.
54. Otukei J.R., Blaschke T. Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2010, 12:27-31.
55. Pakhale G.K., Gupta P.K. Comparison of advanced pixel based (ANN and SVM) and object-oriented classification approaches using landsat-7 ETM+data. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2010, 2(4):245-251.
56. Pal M. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26(1):217-222.
57. Philip H., Ritz J.F. Gigantic paleolandslide associated with active faulting along the Bogd fault (Gobi-Altay, Mongolia). Geology 1999, 27:211-214.
58. Platt R.V., Rapoza L. An evaluation of an object-oriented paradigm for land use/land cover classification. Prof. Geogr. 2008, 60(1):87-100.
59. Pourghasemi H.R., Mohammady M., Pradhan B. Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 2012, 97:71-84.
60. Pradhan B., Lee S. Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 60:1037-1054.
61. Richards J.A. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis 1999, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (240 pp.).
62. Schicker R., Moon V. Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale. Geomorphology 2012, 161-162:40-57.
63. Skempton A.V., Hutchinson J.N. Stability of natural slopes and embankment foundations. State of Art Report, 7th Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Eng., Mexico 1969, 291-335.
64. Song K.Y., Oh H.J., Choi J., Park I., Lee C., Lee S. Prediction of landslide using ASTER imagery and data mining models. Adv. Space Res. 2012, 49:978-993.
65. Sörensen S.-A., Bauer B. On the dynamics of the Köfels sturzstrom. Geomorphology 2003, 54:11-19.
66. Taguchi G. Introduction to Quality Engineering 1990, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, (191 pp.).
67. Tso B., Mather P. Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data 2009, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, (367 pp.).
68. University of Utah Flooding and Landslide in Utah - An Economic Impact Analysis 1984, Bureau of Economic Development and Utah Office of Planning and Budget, Salt Lake City, UT, (123 pp.).
69. Van Den Eeckhaut M., Kerle N., Poesen J., Hervás J. Object-oriented identification of forested landslides with derivatives of single pulse LiDAR data. Geomorphology 2012, 173-174:30-42.
70. Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, Wiley-Interscience, (Available at: http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike0920&path=ASIN/0471030031 [July 28, 2011]).
71. Wang T.Y., Huang C.Y. Improving forecasting performance by employing the Taguchi method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 176:1052-1065.
72. Weirich F., Blesius L. Comparison of satellite and air photo based landslide susceptibility maps. Geomorphology 2007, 87(4):352-364.
73. Wilson R.C., Keefer D.K. Predicting areal limits of earthquake-induced landsliding. Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region - An Earth-Science Perspective. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1360, United States 1985, 316-345. J.I. Ziony (Ed.).
74. Yan G., Mas J.F., Maathuis B.H.P., Xiangmin Z., Van Dijk P.M. Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches - a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27:4039-4055.
75. Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis 2009, Prentice Hall, United States, (576 pp.). 5th ed.