Criteria and properties of the asperity peaks on 3D engineering surfaces

Wear

Volumn 308, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 95-104

  Kalin, M ^a   Pogacnik A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b Iskra Mehanizmi ^*  (Slovenia)

Author keywords

3D asperity peak; Identification; Radii; Real contact area; Surface topography

Indexed keywords

3D ASPERITY-PEAK; ENGINEERING SURFACES; IDENTIFICATION CRITERION; LATERAL RESOLUTION; RADII; REAL CONTACT AREA; THEORETICAL EVALUATION; TRIBOLOGICAL CONTACTS;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; SURFACE MEASUREMENT; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84887358089     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kalin M. Influence of flash temperatures on the tribological behaviour in low-speed sliding: a review. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 374:390-397.
2. Pogacnik A., Kalin M. Parameters influencing the running-in and long-term tribological behaviour of polyamide (PA) against polyacetal (POM) and steel. Wear 2012, 290-291:140-148.
3. Pogačnik A., Požar T., Kalin M., Možina J., Homodyne A Quadrature laser interferometer for micro-asperity deformation analysis. Sensors 2013, 13:703-720.
4. McLaskey G.C., Glaser S.D. Micromechanics of asperity rupture during laboratory stick slip experiments. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38:1-5.
5. Pau M. Estimation of real contact area in a wheel-rail system by means of ultrasonic waves. Tribol. Int. 2003, 36:687-690.
6. Gonzalez-Valadez M., Dwyer-Joyce R.S. Asperity creep measured by the reflection of ultrasound at rough surface contact. J. Tribol. 2009, 131:021410.
7. Ovcharenko A., Halperin G., Etsion I, Varenberg M. A novel test rig for in situ and real time optical measurement of the contact area evolution during pre-sliding of a spherical contact. Tribol. Lett. 2006, 23:55-63.
8. Greenwood J.A., Williamson J.B.P. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1966, 295:300-319.
9. Greenwood J.A. A simplified elliptical model of rough surface contact. Wear 2006, 261:191-200.
10. Jackson R.L., Green I. A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces. Tribol. Int. 2006, 39:906-914.
11. Jackson R.L., Green I. On the modelling of elastic contact between rough surfaces. Tribol. Trans. 2011, 54:300-314.
12. Nayak P.R. Random process model of rough surfaces. J. Lubr. Technol. 1971, 93:398-407.
13. McCool J.I. Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces. Wear 1986, 107:37-60.
14. Majumdar A., Bhushan B. Fractal model of elastic-plastic contact between rough surfaces. J. Tribol. 1990, 112:205-216.
15. Buchner B., Buchner M., Buchmayr B. Determination of the real contact are for numerical simulation. Tribol. Int. 2009, 42:897-901.
16. Jamari J., de Rooij M.B., Schipper D.J. Plastic deterministic contact of rough surfaces. J. Tribol. 2007, 129:957-962.
17. Webster M.N., Sayles R.S. A numerical model for the elastic frictionless contact of real rough surfaces. J. Tribol. 1986, 108:314-320.
18. Söderberg A., Björklund S. Validation of a simplified numerical contact model. Tribol. Int. 2008, 41:926-933.
19. Pogacnik A., Kalin M. How to determine the number of asperity peaks, their radii and heights for engineering surfaces: a critical appraisal. Wear 2013, 300:143-154.
20. Greenwood J.A. A unified theory of surface roughness. Proc. R. Soc. 1984, 393:133-157.
21. E. Tomanik, Modelling of the asperity contact area on actual 3D surfaces, SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1864, 2005.
22. Whitehouse D.J., Phillips M.J. Sampling in a two-dimensional plane. J. Phys. A 1985, 18:2465-2477.
23. Yanagi K., Hara S., Endoh T. Summit identification of anisotropic surface texture and directionality assessment based on asperity tip geometry. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2001, 41:1863-1871.
24. Whitehouse D. Surfaces and Their Measurement 2002, Hermes Penton, London.
25. Maxwell J.C. On hills and dales. Lond. Edinburgh Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1870, 421-425.
26. Blunt L., Jiang X. Advanced Techniques for Assessment Surface Topography 2003, Kogan Page Science Elsevier, Sussex.
27. Vincent L., Soille P. Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 1991, 13:583-598.
28. Barre F., Lopez J. Watershed lines and catchment basins: a new 3D-motif method. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2000, 40:1171-1184.
29. Blanc J., Grimme D., Blateyron F. Surface characterisation based upon significant topographic features. J. Phys. 2011, 311:012014.
30. Scott P.J. Pattern analysis and metrology: the extraction of stable features from observable measurements. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 2004, 460:2845-2864.
31. Kweon I.S., Kanade T. Extracting topographic terrain features from elevation maps. CVGIP: Image Underst. 1994, 59:171-182.
32. R.S. Sayles, T.R. Thomas, Measurement of the statistical microgeometry of engineering surfaces, in: Proceedings of the 1st Joint Polytechnic Symposium on Manufacturing Engineering, Leicester, Leicester Polytechnic.
33. Scott P.J. The mathematics of motif combination and their use for functional simulation. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1992, 32:69-73.
34. Yu N., Polycarpou A. Extracting summit roughness parameters from random Gaussian surfaces accounting for symmetry of the summit heights. J. Tribol. 2004, 126:761-766.
35. Poon C.Y, Bhushan B. Surface roughness analysis of glass-ceramic substrates and finished magnetic disks, and Ni-P coated Al-Mg and glass substrates. Wear 1995, 190:89-109.
36. Bhushan B. Introduction to Tribology 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
37. Zavarise G., Borri-Brunetto M., Paggi M. On the reliability of microscopical contact models. Wear 2004, 257:229-245.
38. Poon C.Y, Bhushan B. Comparison of surface roughness measurements by stylus profiler, AFM and non-contact optical profiler. Wear 1995, 190:76-88.
39. Pasaribu H.R., Schipper D.J. Application of a deterministic contact model to analyse the contact of a rough surface against a flat layered surface. J. Tribol. 2005, 127:451-455.