|
Volumn 54, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1682-1683
|
Results confounded by a disregard for basic dose-response radiobiology
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
MACROSALB TC 99M;
YTTRIUM 90;
MICROSPHERE;
ACCURACY;
ADVANCED CANCER;
BODY SURFACE;
COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASIS;
COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
DOSIMETRY;
GAMMA RADIATION;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
LETTER;
MEDICAL INFORMATION;
MEDICAL LITERATURE;
PREDICTION;
PREDICTIVE VALUE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROGNOSIS;
PUBLICATION;
RADIATION DOSE;
RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION;
RADIOBIOLOGY;
RELIABILITY;
TUMOR VOLUME;
ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM;
COLORECTAL TUMOR;
FEMALE;
LIVER TUMOR;
MALE;
METABOLISM;
NOTE;
PATHOLOGY;
COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS;
EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LIVER NEOPLASMS;
MALE;
MICROSPHERES;
TECHNETIUM TC 99M AGGREGATED ALBUMIN;
|
EID: 84887340087
PISSN: 01615505
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.122846 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (5)
|