Basements and intersections

Hypatia

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 698-715

  Carastathis, Anna ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887320579     PISSN: 08875367     EISSN: 15272001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hypa.12044     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Arnett v. Aspin, 1994. 846 F. Supp. 1234. 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3973 (USDC, 1994). http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic (accessed May 14, 2012).
2. Bartlett, Katherine, and, Angela Harris,. 1998. Gender and the law: Theory, doctrine, commentary. 2nd ed. New York: Aspen Law and Business.
3. Bell, Derrick,. 1991. Foreword: The final civil rights act. California Law Review 79: 597-611.
4. Best, Rachel, et al. 2011. Multiple disadvantages: An empirical test of intersectionality theory in EEO litigation. Stanford Sociology of Law Workshop, March 3. www.stanford.edu/group/lawlibrary/cgi-bin/library/wordpress/wp-content/ uploads/2010/11/best-et-al-multipledisadvantages.pdf (accessed May 30, 2012).
5. Carbado, Devon,. 2000. Race and sex in antidiscrimination law. In Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, 2nd ed., ed., L. Levy, and, K. Karst,. New York: Macmillan.
6. Claremont, Kevin M., and, Stewart J. Schwab,. 2004. How employment discrimination plaintiffs fare in federal court. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (2): 429-458.
7. Claremont, Kevin M., and, Stewart J. Schwab,. 2009. Employment discrimination plaintiffs in federal court: From bad to worse? Harvard Law and Policy Review 3 (1): 3-35.
8. Collins, Patricia Hill,. 1998. Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Combahee River Collective (CRC). 1977 /1983. A black feminist statement. In All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave, ed., Gloria Hull, Patricia Scott, and, Barbara Smith,. New York: The Feminist Press.
10. Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams,. 1988. Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review 101 (7): 1331-87.
11. Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams,. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum: 139-67.
12. Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams,. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241-99.
13. Davis, Kathy,. 2008. Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory 9 (1): 67-85.
14. Dotson, Kristie,. 2013. Knowing in space: Three lessons from black women's social theory. Labrys: études féministes/estudos feministas 23. www.tinyurl.com/kdotson (accessed May 1, 2013).
15. Harrington v. Cleburne,. 2001 251 F.3d 935. 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 10488 (11th Cir. 2001). http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic (accessed May 14, 2012).
16. Harris, Cheryl,. 1993. Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review 106 (8): 1707-91.
17. Judge v. Marsh,. 1986 649 F. Supp.770 (DDC. 1986). http://www.lexisnexis. com/us/lnacademic (accessed May 14, 2012).
18. Kwan, Peter,. 2002. The metaphysics of metaphors: Symbiosis and the quest for meaning. UMKC Law Review 71 (2): 325-30.
19. Lacy, D. Aaron,. 2008. The most endangered Title VII plaintiff? Exponential discrimination against black males. University of Nebraska Law Review 86 (3): 552-94.
20. Levit, Nancy,. 2002. Introduction: Theorizing the connections among systems of subordination. UMKC Law Review 71 (2): 227-49.
21. Lykke, Nina,. 2010. Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. New York and London: Routledge.
22. McKittrick, Katherine,. 2006. Demonic grounds: Black women and the cartographies of struggle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Nash, Jennifer,. 2011. Home truths on intersectionality. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 23: 445-70.
24. Oppenheimer, David Benjamin,. 2003. Verdicts matter: An empirical study of California employment discrimination and wrongful discharge jury verdicts reveals low success rate for women and minorities. UC Davis Law Review 37: 511-66.
25. Rosenblum, Darren,. 1994. Queer intersectionality and the failure of recent lesbian and gay victories. Law and Sexuality 4: 83-122.
26. Rudebusch v. Arizona,. 2007. U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70690 (D. Ariz., 2007). http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic (accessed May 14, 2012).
27. th Cir. Ariz., 2002). http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic (accessed May 14, 2012).
28. Selmi, Michael,. 2001. Why are employment discrimination cases so hard to win? Louisiana Law Review 61 (3): 555-76.
29. Smith, Peggy R,. 1991. Separate identities: Black women, work, and Title VII. Harvard Women's Law Journal 14: 21-76.