Highly correlated hedonic and eudaimonic well-being thwart genomic analysis

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 45, 2013, Pages

  Coyne, James C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPRESSION; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; EUDAIMONIC WELL BEING; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HEDONIC WELL BEING; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WELLBEING;

GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOME, HUMAN; HAPPINESS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PLEASURE; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 84887281941     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1315212110     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Fredrickson BL, et al. (2013) A functional genomic perspective on human well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(33):13684-13689.
2. Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Werler MM, Mitchell AA (2002) Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: An application to birth defects epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 155(2): 176-184.
3. Christenfeld NJ, Sloan RP, Carroll D, Greenland S (2004) Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control. Psychosom Med 66(6):868-875.
4. Macleod J, et al. (2002) Psychological stress and cardiovascular disease: Empirical demonstration of bias in a prospective observational study of Scottish men. BMJ 324(7348): 1247-1251.
5. Breslow N (1982) Design and analysis of case-control studies. Annu Rev Public Health 3(1):29-54.