Building trust for engagement of minorities in human subjects research: Is the glass half full, half empty, or the wrong size?

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 103, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2119-2121

  Quinn, Sandra C ^a   Kass, Nancy E ^b   Thomas, Stephen B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MINORITY GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH SUBJECT; TRUST; UNITED STATES; PSYCHOLOGY;

HUMANS; MINORITY GROUPS; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84887281627     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301685     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. The Minority Health & Health Equity Archive. Statement of Herman Shaw: living participant in Tuskegee Syphilis Study. 1997. Available at: Http://healthequity.pitt.edu/4151. Accessed October 10, 2013.
2. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research; 1979:10.
3. NIH Office of Extramural Research. NIH policy and guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research - Amended, October, 2001. Available at: Http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women-min/ guidelines-amended-10-2001.htm Accessed September 15, 2013.
4. National Institute of Health. NIH policy and guidelines on the inclusion of children as participants in research involving human subjects. Available at: Http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-024.html. Accessed September 15, 2013.
5. Mastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D, eds. Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1994.
6. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) Database for Registered IORGs & IRBs. Approved FWAs, and documents received in last 60 days. US Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: Http://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/ search/search.aspx?styp=bsc. Accessed September 15, 2013.
7. Taylor HA. Implementation of NIH inclusion guidelines: survey of NIH study section members. Clin Trials. 2008;5 (2):140-146.
8. Taylor HA. Inclusion of women, minorities, and children in clinical trials: opinions of research ethics board administrators. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009;4(2):65.
9. Wendler D, Kington R, Madans J, et al. Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Med. 2006;3(2):201-210 .
10. Institute of Medicine of that National Academies.Review of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Available at: Http://iom.edu/Activities/Research/ CTSAreview.aspx Accessed September 15, 2013.
11. Hood NE, Brewer T, Jackson R, Wewers ME. Survey of community engagement in NIH-funded research. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3(1):19-22.
12. Weijer C, Emanuel EJ. Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science. 2000;289(5482):1142-1144.
13. eijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel EJ. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nat Genet. 1999;23(3):275-280.
14. Thomas SB, Quinn SC, Butler J, Fryer CS, Garza MA. Toward a fourth generation of disparities research to achieve health equity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:399-416.