Molecular Mechanical Differences between Isoforms of Contractile Actin in the Presence of Isoforms of Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Hilbert, Lennart ^a,b,c   Bates, Genevieve ^c   Roman, Horia N ^a,c   Blumenthal, Jenna L ^c   Zitouni, Nedjma B ^c   Sobieszek, Apolinary ^d   Mackey, Michael C ^a,b,e   Lauzon, Anne Marie ^a,c,f  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b McIntyre Medical Building   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MUSCLE; PROTEINS;

ACTIN FILAMENT; IN-VITRO; ISOFORMS; MECHANICAL COUPLING; MOLECULAR MECHANICALS; MYOSIN FILAMENTS; PARALLEL MOTION; POWER STROKES; SMOOTH MUSCLES; TROPOMYOSIN;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ACTIN; ALPHA ACTIN; ALPHA BETA TROPOMYOSIN; ALPHA TROPOMYOSIN; ISOPROTEIN; MYOSIN; TROPOMYOSIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; CELL MOTILITY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; IN VITRO STUDY; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SMOOTH MUSCLE; SWINE; VELOCITY;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUSCLE, SMOOTH; PROTEIN ISOFORMS; SWINE; TROPOMYOSIN; TURKEYS;

EID: 84887272518     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003273     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Hosoya M, Miyazaki J, Hirabayashi T, (1989) Tropomyosin isoforms in developing chicken gizzard smooth muscle. J Biochem 105: 712-7.
2. Fatigati V, Murphy A, (1984) Actin and Tropomyosin Variants in Smooth Muscles. Dependence on Tissue Type. J Biol Chem 259: 14383-8.
3. Léguillette R, Gil F, Zitouni N, Lajoie-Kadoch S, Sobieszek A, et al. (2006) (+)Insert Smooth Muscle Myosin Heavy Chain (SM-B): From Single Molecule To Whole Animal. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 38: 1862-74.
4. Fisher S, (2010) Vascular smooth muscle phenotypic diversity and function. Physiolog Genom 42A: 169-87.
5. Morgan K, Gangopahyay S, (2001) Cross-bridge regulation by thin filament-associated proteins. J Appl Physiol 91: 953-62.
6. Léguillette R, Laviolette M, Bergeron C, Zitouni N, Kogut P, et al. (2009) Myosin, transgelin, and myosin light chain kinase: expression and function in asthma. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 179: 194-204.
7. Eddinger T, Meer D, (2007) Myosin II isoforms in smooth muscle: heterogeneity and function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C493-508.
8. Léguillette R, Gil F, Zitouni N, Lajoie-Kadoch S, Sobieszek A, et al. (2005) (+)Insert smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-B) isoform expression in human tissues. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289: C1277-85.
9. Gil F, Zitouni N, Azoulayand E, Maghni K, Lauzon AM, (2006) Smooth muscle myosin isoform expression and LC20 phosphorylation in innate rat airway hyperresponsiveness. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 291: L932-40.
10. Marston S, El-Mezgueldi M, (2008) Role of Tropomyosin in the Regulation of Contraction in Smooth Muscle. Adv Exp Med Biol 644: 110-23.
11. Szymanski P, Chacko T, Rovner A, Goyal R, (1998) Differences in contractile protein content and isoforms in phasic and tonic smooth muscles. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 275: C684-92.
12. Kron S, Spudich J, (1986) Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 6272-6.
13. Umemoto S, Sellers R, (1990) Characterization of in Vitro Motility Assays Using Smooth Muscle and Cytoplasmic Myosins. J Biol Chem 265: 14664-9.
14. Okagaki T, Higashi-Fujime S, Ishikawa R, Takano-Ohmuro H, Kohama K, (1991) In vitro movement of actin filaments on gizzard smooth muscle myosin: Requirement of phosphorylation of myosin light chain and effects of tropomyosin and caldesmon. J Biochem 109: 858-66.
15. Harris D, Warshaw D, (1993) Smooth and Skeletal Muscle Actin Are Mechanically Indistinguishable in the In Vitro Motility Assay. Circ Res 72: 219-24.
16. Maytum R, Konrad M, Lehrer S, Geeves M, (2001) Regulatory properties of tropomyosin effects of length, isoform, and N-terminal sequence. Biochem 40: 7334-41.
17. Graceffa P, Mazurkie A, (2005) Effect of caldesmon on the position and myosin-induced movement of smooth muscle tropomyosin bound to actin. J Biol Chem 280: 4135-43.
18. Williams D, Greene L, Eisenberg E, (1984) Comparison of Effects of Smooth and Skeletal Muscle Tropomyosins on Interactions of Actin and Myosin Subfragment 1. Biochem 23: 4150-5.
19. Lehrer S, Morris P, (1984) Comparison of the Effects of Smooth and Skeletal Tropomyosin on Skeletal Actomyosin Subfragment 1 ATPase. J Biol Chem 259: 2070-2.
20. Graceffa P, (1999) Movement of Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin by Myosin Heads. Biochem 38: 11984-92.
21. Graceffa P, (2000) Phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin heads regulates the head-induced movement of tropomyosin. J Biol Chem 275: 17143-8.
22. Smillie L (1996) Tropomyosin. In: Michael B, editor. Biochemistry of Smooth Muscle Contraction. Waltham: Academic Press. pp. 63-75.
23. Rao J, Rivera-Santiago R, Li X, Lehman W, Dominguez R, (2012) Structural Analysis of Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin α and β Isoforms. J Biol Chem 287: 3165-74.
24. Coulton A, Lehrer S, Geeves M, (2006) Functional Homodimers and Heterodimers of Recombinant Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin. Biochem 45: 12853-8.
25. Coulton A, Koka K, Lehrer S, Geeves M, (2008) Role of the Head-to-Tail Overlap Region in Smooth and Skeletal Muscle β-Tropomyosin. Biochem 47: 388-97.
26. Hilbert L, Cumarasamy S, Zitouni N, Mackey M, Lauzon AM, (2013) The Kinetics of Mechanically Coupled Myosins Exhibit Group Size-Dependent Regimes. Biophys J 105: 1466-1474.
27. Capitanio M, Canepari M, Cacciafesta P, Lombardi V, Cicchi R, et al. (2006) Two independent mechanical events in the interaction cycle of skeletal muscle myosin with actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 87-92.
28. Veigel C, Molloy J, Schmitz S, Kendrick-Jones J, (2003) Load-dependent kinetics of force production by smooth muscle myosin measured with optical tweezers. Nat Cell Biol 5: 980-6.
29. Steffen W, Smith D, Simmons R, Sleep J, (2001) Mapping the actin filament with myosin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 14949-54.
30. Herman I, (1993) Actin isoforms. Curr Opin Cell Biol 5: 48-55.
31. Sobieszek A, (1982) Steady-state kinetic studies on the actin activation of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin subfragments. Effects of skeletal, smooth and non-muscle tropomyosins. J Mol Biol 157: 275-86.
32. Bing W, Knott A, Marston S, (2000) A simple method for measuring the relative force exerted by myosin on actin filaments in the in vitro motility assay: evidence that tropomyosin and troponin increase force in single thin filaments. Biochem J 350: 693-9.
33. Bacchiocchi C, Graceffa P, Lehrer S, (2004) Myosin-Induced Movement of αα,αβ and ββ Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin on Actin Observed by Multisite FRET. Biophys J 86: 2295-307.
34. Merkel L, Ikebe M, Hartshorne D, (1989) Interaction of smooth muscle tropomyosin and smooth muscle myosin. effect on the properties of myosin. Biochem 28: 2215-20.
35. Ruhnow F, Zwicker D, Diez S, (2011) Tracking single particles and elongated filaments with nanometer precision. Biophys J 100: 2820-8.
36. Timmerman M, Kiers H, Smilde A, (2007) Estimating confidence intervals for principal component loadings: A comparison between the bootstrap and asymptotic results. Brit J Math Stat Psychol 60: 295-314.
37. Yua C, Quinn J, Dufournaud C, Harrington J, Rogers P, et al. (1998) Effective dimensionality of environmental indicators: a principal component analysis with bootstrap confidence intervals. J Environ Manag 53: 101-19.
38. Catlin-Groves C, Kirkhope C, Goodenough A, Stafford R, (2009) Use of confidence radii to visualise significant differences in principal components analysis: Application to mammal assemblages at locations with different disturbance levels. Ecol Informatics 4: 147-51.
39. Peng Q, Zhao J, Xue F, (2010) PCA-based bootstrap confidence interval tests for gene-disease association involving multiple SNPs. BMC Genet 11: 6.
40. Sobieszek A (1994) Smooth Muscle Myosin: Molecule Conformation, Filament Assembly and Associated Regulatory Enzymes. In: Raeburn D, Giembycz MA, editors. Airways Smooth Muscle: Biochemical Control of Contraction and Relaxation. Basel: Birkhäuser. pp. 1-29.
41. Pardee J, Spudich J, (1982) Purification of muscle actin. Methods Enzymol 85: 164-81.
42. Ebashi S, (1985) A new simple method of preparing actin from chicken gizzard. J Biochem 97: 693-5.
43. Warshaw D, Desrosier J, Work S, Trybus K, (1990) Smooth muscle myosin cross-bridge interactions modulate actin filament sliding velocity in vitro. J Cell Biol 111: 453-63.
44. Léguillette R, Zitouni N, Govindaraju K, Fong L, Lauzon AM, (2008) Affinity for MgADP and force of unbinding from actin of myosin purified from tonic and phasic smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295: C653-60.
45. Marston S, (2003) Random walks with thin filaments: application of in vitro motility assay to the study of actomyosin regulation. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 24: 149-56.