Researching local perspectives on biodiversity in tropical landscapes: Lessons from ten case studies

Taking Stock of Nature: Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 113-141

  Boissière, Manuel ^a   Sassen, Marieke ^b   Sheil, Douglas ^b   Van Heist, Miriam ^b   De Jong, Wil ^c   Cunliffe, Robert ^b   Wan, Meilinda ^b   Padmanaba, Michael ^b   Liswanti, Nining ^b   Basuki, Imam ^d   Evans, Kristen ^b   Cronkleton, Peter ^b   Lynam, Tim ^e   Koponen, Piia ^b   Bairaktari, Christiana ^f  

^a CIRAD   (France)

^b CIFOR ^*  (Indonesia)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d CIFOR   (Indonesia)

^e CSIRO   (Australia)

^f WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887259262     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511676482.006     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Barney, K. (2005). Central Plans and Global Exports: Tracking Vietnam’s Forestry Commodity Chains and Export Links to China. Forest Trend. Available at: http://www.foresttrends.org/documents/meetings/china_2005_protected/documents/other/Vietnam%20Final%20Report%206-1-05.pdf
2. Basuki, I. and Sheil, D. (2005). Local Perspectives of Forest Landscapes: A Preliminary Evaluation of Land and Soils, and their Importance in Malinau, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.Bogor: CIFOR.
3. Boissiere, M., Basuki, I., Koponen, P, Wan, M. and Sheil, D. (2006). Biodiversity and Local Perceptions on the Edge of a Conservation Area, Khe Tran Village, Vietnam. Bogor: CIFOR.
4. Boissiere, M. and N. Liswanti (2006). Biodiversity in a Batak Village of Palawan (Philippines). A Multidisciplinary Assessment of Local Perceptions and Priorities. Bogor: CIFOR.
5. Boissiere, M. and Sassen, M. (2007). Mesurer l’importance de la biodiversite pour les societes forestieres des pays du Sud. Une methode d’investigation pluridisciplinaire. Nature, Sciences et Sociétés15(1), 23-32.
6. Campo P C. and Villanueva T. R. (2006). Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) Modelling to Improve the Management of Common Renewable Resources in Palawan, Philippines, IASCP 2006 Conference Papers, 16 pp. Available at: http://www.iascp.org/bali/papers.html.
7. Cefaï, D. (2003). L’enquete de terrain.Paris: La Decouverte MAUSS, 615 pp.
8. CIFOR (2004). Building Capacity for Multidisciplinary Landscape Assessment in Papua: three phases of training and pilot assessments in the Mamberamo Basin. Unpublished report.
9. Cunliffe, R. N. (2003). Responses by the Nhanchururu Community to the two SAfMA-GMScenarios: ‘Patronage’ and ‘Devolution’. Unpublished report prepared for the Gorongosa-Marromeu Transect of the Southern African Millenium Assessment, Harare: Institute of Environmental Studies, University of Zimbabwe.
10. Cunliffe, R. N., Lynam, T. J. P, Sheil, D. et al.(2007). Developing a predictive understanding of landscape importance to the Punan-Pelancau of East Kalimantan, Borneo. Ambio36(7), 593-599.
11. Cunningham, A. B. (2001). Applied Ethnobotany. People, Wild Plant Use and Conservation.People and Plants Conservation Manual Series. London: Earthscan Publications, 300pp.
12. Devanadera, M. E., Gamutia, A., Hartanto, H., Mallion, F. K. and Villanueva, T. (2004). Philippines Country Report, Year 1.LPF/03/2004, UPLB, CIRAD, CIFOR.
13. Eder, J. F. (1987). On the Road of Tribal Extinction. Depopulation, Deculturation and Adaptative Well-being among the Batak of the Philippines.Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Evans, K. (2006). Evaluating and adapting future scenarios in forest dependent communities in Hue province, Vietnam.Unpublished report to the Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
15. Evans, K.W.,.de Jong, W.P., Miranda, P. and Cronkleton, P. (2005). Evaluating and Adaptating Multidisciplinary Landscape Assessment in Forest-dependent Communities in the Northern Bolivian Amazon Bogor: CIFOR, 36 pp.
16. Groot, R. D., de Wilson, M. A. and Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and evaluation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics41, 393-408.
17. Jum, C. N. and Oyono, P R. (2005). Building collaboration through action research: the case of Ottotomo Forest Reserve in Cameroon. International Forestry Review7(1), 37-43.
18. Kompas A. (2006). Target: Tiga Juta Hektar Sawit. Swasta Perlu Insentif untuk Kem-bangkan Biodiesel. Kompas (an Indonesian National Newspaper), 26 January
19. Lynam, T., Cunliffe, R., Sheil, D. et al. (2007). Livelihoods, Land Types and the Importance of Ecosystem Goods and Services: Developing a Predictive Understanding of Landscape Valuation by the Punan Pelancau People of East Kalimantan.Bogor: CIFOR.
20. Murniati, Padmanaba M., Basuki, I. and Van der Ploeg, J. (2006). Gunung Lumut Biodiversity Assessment, Socio-economic Study.Balikpapan: Tropenbos International Indonesia.
21. Padmanaba, M. and Sheil, D. (2007). Finding and promoting a local conservation consensus in a globally important tropical forest landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation16(1), 137-151.
22. Philips, O. L. (1996). Some quantitative methods for analyzing ethnobotanical knowledge. In Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual, ed. M.N. Alexiades. USA: The New York Botanical Garden, pp. 171-197.
23. Pye-Smith, C. (2005). Biodiversity: a new perspective. New Scientist,10 December 2005, 50.
24. Sassen, M. and Jum, C. (2007). Assessing local perspectives in a forested landscape in Central Cameroon. Forest, Trees and Livelihoods17(1), 23-42.
25. Sassen, M. and Wan, M. (2006). Biodiversity and Local Priorities in a Community Near the Ivindo National Park. Makokou, Gabon. Research report published online by the Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), available at http://www.cifor. cgiar.org/mla.
26. Sheil, D. and Wunder, S. (2002). The value of tropical forest to local communities: complications, caveats and cautions. Conservation Ecology 6(2), 9. Available at: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art9.
27. Sheil, D., Puri, R., Basuki, I. etal. (2003). Exploring Biological Diversity, Environment and Local People’s Perspectives in Forest Landscapes. Bogor: CIFOR. Revised and Updated Edition - also in Indonesian, French and Spanish. Available at http:www.cifor. cgiar.org/mla.
28. Sheil, D. and Boissiere, M. (2006). People may be the best allies in conservation. Nature440, 868.
29. Sheil, D. and Liswanti, N. (2006). Scoring the importance of tropical forest landscapes with local people: patterns and insights. Environmental Management38(1), 12636.
30. Sheil, D., Puri, R. K., Wan, M. et al.(2006). Recognizing local people’s priorities for tropical forest biodiversity. Ambio35(1), 17-24.
31. Steinberg, P F. (2005). From public concern to policy effectiveness: civic conservation in developing countries. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy8, 341-65.
32. Stoffle, R. W., Halmo, D. B. and Evans, M. J. (1990). Calculating the cultural significance of American Indian plants: paiute and Shoshone ethnobotany at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. American Anthropologist92(2), 416-432.
33. Turner, N. J. (1988). ‘The importance of a rose’: Evaluating the cultural significance of plants in Thompson and Lillooet interior Salish. American Anthropologist90, 272-290.
34. Van Der Meer, P J., Bairaktari, C., de Groot, R. S., van Heist, M. and Schmerbeck, J. (2006). Methodology for Assessing Benefits of Afforested Community and Forest Land.Wageningen: ALTERRA.
35. Yance de Fretes (2006). Menggali Kekayaan Keanekaragaman Hayati Kawasan Mam-beramo. Tropika Indonesia10(1), 8-11.