Effective therapies or effective mechanisms in treatment guidelines for depression?

Depression and Anxiety

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1055-1057

  Cuijpers, Pim ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEMENTIA; DEPRESSION; DOSE RESPONSE; EXPECTATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SUPPORT GROUP; THEORETICAL STUDY;

DEPRESSION; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

EID: 84887257606     PISSN: 10914269     EISSN: 15206394     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/da.22205     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H, et al. Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for depressed patients: a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001454.
2. Driessen E, Van HL, Don FJ, et al. The efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Psychodynamic Therapy in the outpatient treatment of major depression: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Psychiatry 2013; 170: 1041-1050.
3. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Depression; The treatment and management of depression in adults. NICE Clinical Guideline 90. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2009.
4. Karasu TB, Gelenberg A, Merriam A, et al. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. Washington: Work Group on Major Depressive Disorder, American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
5. Norcross JC, Wampold BE,. Evidence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy 2011; 48: 98-102.
6. Budd R, Hughes I,. The Dodo Bird Verdict-controversial, inevitable and important: a commentary on 30 years of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Psychother 2009; 16: 510-522.
7. Orlinsky DA, Ronnestad MH, Willutzki U,. Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: continuity and change. In:, Lambert MJ, editor. Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 2004, pp. 307-390.
8. Wampold BE,. The Great Psychotherapy Debate; Models, Methods and Findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
9. Kazdin AE,. Comparative outcome studies of psychotherapy: methodological issues and strategies. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986; 54: 95-105. (Pubitemid 17022266)
10. Cuijpers P, Berking M, Andersson G, et al. A meta-analysis of cognitive behavior therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison to other treatments. Can J Psychiatry 2013; 58: 376-385.
11. Cuijpers P, Geraedts AS, van Oppen P, et al. Interpersonal psychotherapy of depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168: 581-592.
12. Kazdin AE,. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2007; 3: 1-27. (Pubitemid 46651119)
13. Kazdin AE,. Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychother Res 2009; 19: 418-428.