Which is better: A miniaturized percutaneous ventricular assist device or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for patients with cardiogenic shock?

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 607-611

  Chamogeorgakis, Themistokles ^a,b,c   Rafael, Aldo ^a   Shafii, Alexis E ^a,b   Nagpal, Dave ^a   Pokersnik, Julie A ^a   Gonzalez Stawinski, Gonzalo V ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

ECMO; Impella; mp VAD; TandemHeart

Indexed keywords

ECMO; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; IMPELLA; INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; MP-VAD; TANDEMHEART; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;

HOSPITALS;

RESPIRATORY THERAPY;

ADULT; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLEEDING; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOMYOPATHY; CENTRIFUGAL PUMP; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPARTMENT SYNDROME; COMPLICATION; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; FEMALE; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE FAILURE; HUMAN; HYPERPERFUSION SYNDROME; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;

AGE FACTORS; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; FEMALE; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC;

EID: 84887237026     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: 1538943X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182a8baf7     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Gibbon JH Jr: The development of the heart-lung apparatus. Am J Surg 135: 608-619, 1978.
2. Stoney WS: Evolution of cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 119: 2844-2853, 2009.
3. Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, et al: Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J 30: 2102-2108, 2009.
4. Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, et al: Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 26: 1276-1283, 2005. (Pubitemid 41435457)
5. Lamarche Y, Cheung A, Ignaszewski A, et al: Comparative outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients managed with Impella microaxial pump or extracorporeal life support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142: 60-65, 2011.
6. Thiele H, Lauer B, Hambrecht R, Boudriot E, Cohen HA, Schuler G: Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-tofemoral arterial bypass assistance. Circulation 104: 2917-2922, 2001. (Pubitemid 33139103)
7. Rajagopal V, Steahr G, Wilmer CI, Raval NY: A novel percutaneous mechanical biventricular bridge to recovery in severe cardiac allograft rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant 29: 93-95, 2010.
8. Kawashima D, Gojo S, Nishimura T, et al: Left ventricular mechanical support with Impella provides more ventricular unloading in heart failure than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 57: 169-176, 2011.
9. Meyns B, Dens J, Sergeant P, Herijgers P, Daenen W, Flameng W: Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock-Impella support for cardiogenic shock. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 51: 312-317, 2003. (Pubitemid 38031386)
10. Pokersnik JA, Buda T, Bashour CA, Gonzalez-Stawinski GV: Have changes in ECMO technology impacted outcomes in adult patients developing postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock? J Card Surg 27: 246-252, 2012.
11. Smedira NG, Moazami N, Golding CM, et al: Clinical experience with 202 adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac failure: survival at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122: 92-102, 2001.
12. Yulong G, Xiaowei S, McCoach R, Kunselman A, El-Banayosy A, Undar A: Mechanical performance comparison between RotaFlow and CentriMag centrifugal blood pumps in an adult ECLS model. Perfusion 25: 71-76, 2010.