Experiments with hierarchical text classification

Proceedings of the 9th IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, ASC 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 177-182

  Granitzer, Michael ^a   Auer, Peter ^b  

^a KNOW CENTER   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEOBEN   (Austria)

Author keywords

Boosting; Hierarchical Text Classification; Machine Learning; Ranking Performance; Supervised Learning

Indexed keywords

BOOSTING; COMPUTATIONAL LEARNING THEORY; DIRECTED ACYCLIC GRAPH (DAG); HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION; HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFIERS; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; RANKING PERFORMANCE; TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

ADAPTIVE BOOSTING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ERROR ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SOFT COMPUTING; SUPERVISED LEARNING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 84887229826     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. S. T. Dumais and H. Chen. Hierarchical classification of Web content. In Proceedings of SIGIR-00, 23rd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Athens, GR. ACM Press, New York, US.
2. T. Joachims. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning.
3. D. Koller and M. Sahami. Hierarchically classifying documents using very few words. In Proceedings of ICML-97, 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, US. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, US.
4. A. K. McCallum, R. Rosenfeld, T. M. Mitchell, and A. Y. Ng. Improving text classification by shrinkage in a hierarchy of classes. In Proceedings of ICML-98, 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, US. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, US.
5. J. Platt. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods. pages 61-74, 2000.
6. J. J. Rocchio. In In Gerard Salton, editor, The SMART retrieval system: experiments in automatic document processing, pages 313-323, Englewood Clis, US, 1971. Prentice-Hall.
7. T. Rose, M. Stevenson, and M. Whitehead. The reuters corpus volume 1 - from yesterday's news to tomorrow's language resources. In Proceedings of the Third Internaional Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
8. M. E. Ruiz and P. Srinivasan. Hierarchical text categorization using neural networks. Information Retrieval, 5(1):87-118, 2002.
9. R. E. Schapire and Y. Singer. Boostexter: A boostingbased system for text categorization. Machine Learning, 39(2/3):135-168, 2000.
10. F. Sebastiani. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 34(1):1-47, 2002.
11. A. Sun and E.-P. Lim. Hierarchical text classification and evaluation. In ICDM, pages 521-528, 2001.
12. T. Wu, C.-J. Lin, and R. C. Weng. Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. Journal of Machine Learning Research, Mar. 2004.
13. Y. Yang and X. Liu. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In Proceedings of SIGIR-99, 22nd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, US. ACM Press, New York, US.
14. T. Zhang. Statistical behavior and consistency of classification methods based on convex risk minimization. The Annals of Statistics, 32:56-134, Mar. 2004.