CyberGIS-Toward synergistic advancement of cyberinfrastructure and GIScience: A workshop summary

Journal of Spatial Information Science

Volumn 4, Issue 2012, 2012, Pages 125-148

  Wang, Shaowen ^a   Wilkins Diehr, Nancy R ^b   Nyerges, Timothy L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887210353     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1948660X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5311/JOSIS.2012.4.83     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ANSELIN, L. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.
2. ARMSTRONG, M., NYERGES, T.,WANG, S., AND WRIGHT, D. Connecting geospatial information to society through cyberinfrastructure. In Handbook of GIS and Society Research, T. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, and R. Mcmaster, Eds. Sage, London, 2011, ch. 6.
3. ATKINS, D., DROEGEMEIER, K., FELDMAN, S., GARCIA-MOLINA, H., KLEIN, M., MESSERSCHMITT, D., MESSINA, P., OSTRIKER, J., AND WRIGHT, M. Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the national science foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure. Tech. rep., National Science Foundation, 2012. Last access on Feb. 12, 2012 at http:swww.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/nsf0728.pdf.
4. BENNETT, D., AND TANG, W. Modelling adaptive, spatially aware, andmobile agents: Elk migration in Yellowstone. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20, 9 (2006), 1039-1066. doi: 10.1080/13658810600830806.
5. DESANCTIS, G., AND MONGE, P. Communication processes for virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, 4 (1998), 693-703. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00083.x.
6. GOODCHILD, M., AND HAINING, R. GIS and spatial data analysis: Converging perspectives. Papers in Regional Science 83 (2004), 363-385. doi:10.1007/s10110-003-0190-y.
7. HEALEY, R., DOWERS, S., GITTINGS, B., AND MINETER, M. Parallel Processing Algorithms for GIS. Taylor and Francis, Bristol, PA, 1998.
8. HEY, A., TANSLEY, S., AND TOLLE, K. The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington, 2009.
9. HEY, T., AND TREFETHEN, A. Cyberinfrastructure for e-science. Science 308, 5723 (2005), 817-821. doi:10.1126/science.1110410.
10. KNOWLES, A., ROUSB, W., ABSBERE, C., FARRELL, L., FEINBERG, A., HUMBER, T., KUZZY, G., AND WIRENE, C. What could lee see at gettyburg? In Placing History: How Maps, Spatial Data, and GIS Are Changing Historical Scholarship, A. Knowles and A. Hillier, Eds. Esri Press, 2008, pp. 235-266.
11. MCCOOL, R. Rethinking the semantic web, Part I. IEEE Internet Computing 9 9, 6 (2005), 86-87. doi:10.1109/MIC.2005.133.
12. MCCOOL, R. Rethinking the semantic web, Part II. IEEE Internet Computing 10, 1 (2006), 93-96. doi:10.1109/MIC.2006.18.
13. NATIONAL, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL (NSTC). Social, behavioral, and economic research in the federal context. Last access on Feb. 12, 2012 at http:swww. nsf.gov/sbe/prospectus v10 3 17 09.pdf, 2009.
14. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF). Cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discovery. Last access on Feb. 12, 2012 at http:swww.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/nsf0728.pdf, 2007.
15. OPEN SCIENCE GRID CONSORTIUM. Open science grid virtual organization. Last access on Feb. 12, 2012 at http:sosg-docdb.opensciencegrid.org/0000/000018/008/OSG%20Blueprintv.13.pdf, 2005.
16. PENG, Z., AND TSOU, M. Internet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Networks. JohnWiley&Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003.
17. POORE, B. Users as essential contributors to spatial cyberinfrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 14 (2011), 5510-5515. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907677108.
18. REED, D. Computational science: Ensuring america's competitiveness, report to the president by the president's information technology advisory committe. Tech. rep., The National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research and Development (NCO/IT R&D), 2005. Last access on Feb. 12, 2012 at http:swww.nitrd.gov/pitac/reports/20050609 computational/computational.pdf.
19. REY, S., AND ANSELIN, L. PySAL: A python library of spatial analytical methods. Review of Regional Studies 37, 1 (2007), 5-27.
20. SUI, D., AND GOODCHILD, M. The convergence of GIS and social media: challenges for GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 25, 11 (2011), 1737-1748. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.604636.
21. TANG, W., WANG, S., BENNETT, D., AND LIU, Y. Agent-based modeling within a cyberinfrastructure environment: a service-oriented computing approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 25, 9 (2011), 1323-1346. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.585342.
22. WANG, S. A CyberGIS framework for the synthesis of cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100, 3 (2010), 535-557. doi:10.1080/00045601003791243.
23. WANG, S., AND ARMSTRONG, M. A quadtree approach to domain decomposition for spatial interpolation in grid computing environments. Parallel Computing 29, 10 (2003), 1481-1504. doi:10.1016/j.parco.2003.04.003.
24. WANG, S., AND ARMSTRONG, M. A theoretical approach to the use of cyberinfrastructure in geographical analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 23, 2 (2009), 169-193. doi:10.1080/13658810801918509.
25. WANG, S., ARMSTRONG, M., AND BENNETT, D. Conceptual basics of middleware design to support grid computing of geographic information. In Proc. Second International Conference on Geographic Information Science (Boulder, CO, 2002), pp. 197-200.
26. WANG, S.,ARMSTRONG, M.,NI, J., AND LIU, Y. GISolve: A grid-based problemsolving environment for computationally intensive geographic information analysis. In Proc. 14th International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC), Challenges of Large Applications in Distributed Environments (CLADE) Workshop (2005), IEEE Press, pp. 3-12. doi:10.1109/CLADE.2005.1520892.
27. WANG, S., AND LIU, Y. TeraGrid GIScience gateway: Bridging cyberinfrastructure and GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 23, 5 (2009), 631-656. doi:10.1080/13658810902754977.
28. WILKINS-DIEHR, N. Science gateways-common community interfaces to grid resources. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper 19, 6 (2007), 743-749. doi:10.1002/cpe.v19:6.
29. WILKINS-DIEHR, N., GANNON, D., KLIMECK, G., OSTER, S., AND PAMIDIGHANTAM, S. TeraGrid science gateways and their impact on science. Computer 41, 11 (2008), 32-41. doi:10.1109/MC.2008.470.
30. WORBOYS, M., AND DUCKHAM, M. Monitoring qualitative spatiotemporal change for geosensor networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20, 10 (2006), 1087-1108. doi:10.1080/13658810600852180.
31. WRIGHT, D., AND WANG, S. The emergence of spatial cyberinfrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 14 (2011), 5488-5491. doi:10.1073/pnas.110305110.
32. YANG, C., RASKIN, R., GOODCHILD, M., AND GAHEGAN, M. Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: Past, present and future. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34, 4 (2010), 264-277. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.04.001.
33. YANG, C.,WU, H.,HUANG, Q., LI, Z., AND LI, J. Using spatial principles to optimize distributed computing for enabling the physical science discoveries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 14 (2011), 5498-5503. doi:10.1073/pnas.0909315108.