Incentivizing behaviour change to improve diabetes care

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1071-1076

  Petry, N M ^a   Cengiz, E ^b   Wagner, J A ^c   Hood, K K ^d   Carria, L ^b   Tamborlane, W V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioural economics; Diabetes; Incentives; Reinforcement

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; INSULIN;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DIABETES CONTROL; DIABETES MELLITUS; EXERCISE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS; DIABETES; INCENTIVES; REINFORCEMENT;

DIABETES MELLITUS; EXERCISE THERAPY; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 84887197679     PISSN: 14628902     EISSN: 14631326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12111     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Sindelar JL. Paying for performance: the power of incentives over habits. Health Econ 2008; 17: 449-451.
2. Bijou SW, Orlando R. Rapid development of multiple-schedule performances with retarded children. J Exp Anal Behav 1961; 4: 7-16.
3. Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006; 101: 192-203.
4. Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction 2006; 101: 1546-1560.
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE clinical guideline 51: drug misuse: psychosocial interventions, 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11812/35973/35973.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2012.
6. Petry NM. Contingency Management for Substance Abuse Treatment: A Guide to Implementing this Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Routledge, 2012.
7. Budney AJ, Higgin ST, Radonovich KJ, Novy PL. Adding voucher-based incentives to coping skills and motivational enhancement improves outcomes during treatment for marijuana dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2007; 68: 1051-1061.
8. Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK et al. Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 568-576.
9. Petry NM, Martin B, Cooney JL, Kranzler HR. Give them prizes, and they will come: contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68: 250-257.
10. Peirce JM, Petry NM, Stitzer ML, Blaine J, Kellogg S, Satterfield F. Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 201-208.
11. Petry NM, Peirce JM, Stitzer ML et al. Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 1148-1156.
12. Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, Leyro TM, Powers MB, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165: 179-187.
13. Petry NM, DePhillipis D, Rash CJ, Drapkin M, McKay JR. Implementing contingency management in clinical practice settings: the veterans administration experience (Under review).
14. Ferster CB, Skinner BF. Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1957.
15. Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol Gen 1999; 128: 78-87.
16. Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 2001; 127: 267-286.
17. Petry NM, Alessi SM, Hanson T, Sierra S. Randomized trial of contingent prizes versus vouchers in cocaine-using methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 2007; 75: 983-991.
18. Green L, Fry AF, Myerson J. Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychol Sci 1994; 5: 33-36.
19. Bryden K, Peveler R, Stein A et al. Clinical and psychological course of diabetes from adolescence to young adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1536-1540.
20. Hood KK, Peterson CM, Rohan JM, Drotar D. Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2009; 12: 1171-1179.
21. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011 National Diabetes Fact Sheet. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/estimates11.htm#1. Accessed 12 December 2012.
22. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 30: 977-986.
23. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2643-2653.
24. Hoerger TJ, Segel JE, Gregg EW, Saaddine JB. Is glycemic control improving in U.S. adults? Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 81-86.
25. DiMeglio LA, Miller KM, Beck RW et al. Most persons with Type 1 diabetes do not meet clinical recommendations: an analysis from the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry. Presented at Am Diabetes Assoc 2012, 1376-P.
26. Narayan KMV, Zhang P, Kanaya AM et al. Diabetes: The pandemic and potential solutions. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al., eds. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edn. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006.
27. Petry NM, Barry D, Alessi SM, Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM. A randomized trial adapting contingency management targets based on initial abstinence status of cocaine-dependent patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011; 80: 276-285.
28. Petry NM, Weinstock J, Alessi SM. A randomized trial of contingency management delivered in the context of group counseling. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011; 79: 686-696.
29. Petry NM, Martin B, Finocche C. Contingency management in group treatment: a demonstration project in an HIV drop-in center. J Subst Abuse Treat 2001; 21: 89-96.
30. Austin S, Wolfe BL. The effect of patient reminders and gas station gift cards on patient adherence to testing guidelines for diabetes. Wis Med J 2011; 110: 132-137.
31. Volpp KGJ, Troxel LK, Norton AB, Fassbender L, Loewenstein G. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA 2008; 300: 2631-2637.
32. Petry NM, Barry D, Pescatello L, White WB. A low-cost reinforcement procedure improves short-term weight loss outcomes. Am J Med 2011; 124: 1082-1085.
33. Brownell KD. The LEARN Program for Weight Management. 10th edn. Dallas: American Health Publishing Company, 2004.
34. John LK, Loewenstein G, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender JE, Volpp KG. Financial incentives for extended weight loss: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26: 621-626.
35. Hubbert KA, Bussey BF, Allison DB, Beasley TM, Henson CS, Heimburger DC. Effects of outcome-driven insurance reimbursement on short-term weight control. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 1423-1429.
36. Crespo CJ, Keteyian SJ, Heath GW, Sempos CT. Leisure-time physical activity among US adults. Results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 93-98.
37. Petry NM, Andrade LF, Barry D, Byrne S. A randomized study of reinforcing ambulatory exercise in older adults. Psychol Aging 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
38. Petry NM, Rash CJ, Byrne S, Ashraf S, White WB. Financial reinforcers for improving medication adherence: findings from a meta-analysis. Am J Med 2012; 125: 888-896.
39. Rosen MI, Dieckhaus K, McMahon TJ et al. Improved adherence with contingency management. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2007; 21: 30-40.
40. Raiff BR, Dallery J. Internet-based contingency management to improve adherence with blood glucose testing recommendations for teens with type 1 diabetes. J Appl Behav Anal 2010; 43: 487-491.
41. Long JA, Jahnle EC, Richardson DM, Loewenstein G, Volpp KG. Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 416-424.
42. Schmidt H, Asch DA, Halpern SD. Fairness and wellness incentives: what is the relevance of the process-outcome distinction? Prev Med 2012; 55(Suppl): S118-S123.
43. Helgeson VS, Honcharuk E, Becker D, Escobar O, Siminerio L. A focus on blood glucose monitoring: relation to glycemic control and determinants of frequency. Pediatr Diabetes 2011; 12: 25-30.
44. Virdi N, Daskiran M, Nigam S, Kozma C, Raja P. The association of self-monitoring of blood glucose use with medication adherence and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating non-insulin treatment. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012; 14: 790-798.
45. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group et al. Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1947-1953.
46. Priebe S, Burton A, Ashby D et al. Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients - a cluster randomised controlled trial (FIAT). BMC Psychiatry 2009; 9: 61.
47. Promberger M, Brown RC, Ashcroft RE, Marteau TM. Acceptability of financial incentives to improve health outcomes in UK and US samples. J Med Ethics 2011; 37: 682-687.
48. Promberger M, Dolan P, Marteau TM. "Pay them if it works": discrete choice experiments on the acceptability of financial incentives to change health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med 2012; 75: 509-514.
49. Olmstead TA, Petry NM. The cost-effectiveness of prize and voucher contingency management in cocaine- or opioid-dependent outpatients. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 102: 108-115.
50. Naito NA, Higgins ST. Controlling health care costs in the military: the case for using financial incentives to improve beneficiary personal health indicators. Prev Med 2012; 55: S113-S115.