Tea Bag Index: A novel approach to collect uniform decomposition data across ecosystems

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1070-1075

  Keuskamp, Joost A ^a   Dingemans, Bas J J ^a   Lehtinen, Taru ^b,c   Sarneel, Judith M ^d,e   Hefting, Mariet M ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^d NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

^e UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Climate change; Crowdsourcing; Field sampling; Green tea; Litter bag; Litter decomposition; Microbial ecology; Rooibos tea

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887191074     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2041210X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12097     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berg, B. & Meentemeyer, V. (2002) Litter quality in a north European transect versus carbon storage potential. Plant and Soil, 242, 83-92.
2. Berg, B., Berg, M.P., Bottner, P., Box, E., Breymeyer, A., Calvo de Anta, R. et al. (1993) Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry, 20, 127-159.
3. Bonan, G.B., Hartman, M.D., Parton, W.J. & Wieder, W.R. (2012) Evaluating litter decomposition in earth system models with long-term litterbag experiments: an example using the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). Global Change Biology, 19, 957-974.
4. Cantymedia Weatherbase. (2013) Available at: http://www.weatherbase.com (Retrieved 26 March 2013).
5. Correll, R.L., Harch, B.D., Kirkby, C.A. & O'Brien, K. (1997) Statistical analysis of reduction in tensile strength of cotton strips as a measure of soil microbial activity. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 31, 9-17.
6. Davidson, E.A. & Janssens, I.A. (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440, 165-173.
7. FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2000) Suitability of soil and climate conditions for carbon sequestration. Available at: http://www.fao.org/geonetwork (Retrieved 26 March 2013).
8. Fritz, K.M., Fulton, S., Johnson, B.R., Barton, C.D., Jack, J.D., Word, D.A. & Burke, R.A. (2011) An assessment of cellulose filters as a standardized material for measuring litter breakdown in headwater streams. Ecohydrology, 4, 469-476.
9. Harrison, A.F., Latter, P.M. & Walton, D.W.H. (1988) Cotton Strip Assay: An Index of Decomposition in Soils (ed. P.M. Latter ), Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-Over-Sands, UK.
10. Heimann, M. & Reichstein, M. (2008) Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks. Nature, 451, 289-292.
11. Laio, F., D'Odorico, P. & Ridolfi, L. (2006) An analytical model to relate the vertical root distribution to climate and soil properties. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L18401.
12. Parton, W., Silver, W.L., Burke, I.C., Grassens, L. & Harmon, M.E. (2007) Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science, 315, 361-364.
13. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & R Core Team (2012) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models, 3rd edn. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN), Vienna, Austria.
14. Prescott, C.E. (2010) Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry, 101, 133-149.
15. R Core Team (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
16. Ryan, M.G., Melillo, J.M. & Ricca, A. (1990) A comparison of methods for determining proximate carbon fractions of forest litter. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 166-171.
17. Sanchez, P.A., Ahamed, S., Carré, F., Hartemink, A.E., Hempel, J., Huising, J. et al. (2009) Digital soil map of the world. Science, 325, 680-681.
18. Schenk, H.J. & Jackson, R.B. (2002) The global biogeography of roots. Ecological Monographs, 72, 311.
19. Setälä, H., Marshall, V.G. & Trofymow, J.A. (1996) Influence of body size of soil fauna on litter decomposition and 15 N uptake by poplar in a pot trial. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28, 1661-1675.
20. Slocum, M.G., Roberts, J. & Mendelssohn, I.A. (2009) Artist canvas as a new standard for the cotton-strip assay. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 172, 71-74.
21. Stockmann, U., Adams, M.A., Crawford, J.W., Field, D.J., Henakaarchchi, N., Jenkins, M. et al. (2013) The knowns, known unknowns and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic carbon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 164, 80-99.
22. Tiegs, S.D., Langhans, S.D., Tockner, K. & Gessner, M.O. (2007) Cotton strips as a leaf surrogate to measure decomposition in river floodplain habitats. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 26, 70-77.
23. Trofymow, J.A., Moore, T.R., Titus, B., Prescott, C., Morrison, I., Siltanen, M. et al. (2002) Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: influence of litter quality and climate. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 789-804.
24. Wieder, R.K. & Lang, G.E. (1982) A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology, 63, 1636-1642.
25. Zhang, D., Hui, D., Luo, Y. & Zhou, G. (2008) Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. Journal of Plant Ecology, 1, 85-93.