Influence of sex on risk stratification with stress myocardial perfusion Rb-82 positron emission tomography: Results from the PET (positron emission tomography) Prognosis Multicenter Registry

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 62, Issue 20, 2013, Pages 1866-1876

  Kay, Jenna ^a   Dorbala, Sharmila ^b   Goyal, Abhinav ^a   Fazel, Reza ^a   Di Carli, Marcelo F ^b   Einstein, Andrew J ^c   Beanlands, Robert S ^d   Merhige, Michael E ^e   Williams, Brent A ^f   Veledar, Emir ^a   Chow, Benjamin J W ^d   Min, James K ^g   Berman, Daniel S ^g   Shah, Sana ^a   Bellam, Naveen ^a   Butler, Javed ^a   Shaw, Leslee J ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center ^*  (United States)

^f GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

PET; prognosis; risk re classification; sex

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; DIPYRIDAMOLE; RUBIDIUM 82;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART DEATH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURVIVOR;

CAD; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION; LVEF; NET RE-CLASSIFICATION IMPROVEMENT INDEX; NRI; PET; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; RB-82; RISK RE-CLASSIFICATION; RUBIDUM-82; SEX; SINGLE-PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; SPECT;

AGED; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; MYOCARDIUM; NORTH AMERICA; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84887174010     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. J.H. Mieres, L.J. Shaw, and A. Arai Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association Circulation 111 2005 682 696
2. R. Gianrossi, R. Detrano, and D. Mulvihill Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis Circulation 80 1989 87 98
3. L.J. Shaw, T.H. Marwick, and D.S. Berman Incremental cost-effectiveness of exercise echocardiography vs. SPECT imaging for the evaluation of stable chest pain Eur Heart J 27 2006 2448 2458
4. S.M. Navare, J.F. Mather, L.J. Shaw, M.S. Fowler, and G.V. Heller Comparison of risk stratification with pharmacologic and exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis J Nucl Cardiol 11 2004 551 561
5. M.I. Travin, M.D. Duca, G.M. Kline, S.D. Herman, D.D. Demus, and G.V. Heller Relation of gender to physician use of test results and to the prognostic value of stress technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography scintigraphy Am Heart J 134 1997 73 82
6. L.J. Shaw, J.F. Lewis, and M.A. Hlatky Women's ischemic syndrome evaluation: current status and future research directions: Report of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Workshop: October 2-4, 2002: Section 5: gender-related risk factors for ischemic heart disease Circulation 109 2004 e56 e58
7. L.J. Shaw, D.D. Miller, J.C. Romeis, D. Kargl, L.T. Younis, and B.R. Chaitman Gender differences in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease Ann Intern Med 120 1994 559 566
8. L.J. Shaw, C. Vasey, S. Sawada, C. Rimmerman, and T.H. Marwick Impact of gender on risk stratification by exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography: long-term mortality in 4234 women and 6898 men Eur Heart J 26 2005 447 456
9. T. Sharir, X. Kang, and G. Germano Prognostic value of poststress left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by gated myocardial perfusion spect in women and men: gender-related differences in normal limits and outcomes J Nucl Cardiol 13 2006 495 506
10. R. Hachamovitch, S.W. Hayes, J.D. Friedman, I. Cohen, and D.S. Berman Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography Circulation 107 2003 2900 2907
11. K.R. Nandalur, B.A. Dwamena, A.F. Choudhri, S.R. Nandalur, P. Reddy, and R.C. Carlos Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis Acad Radiol 15 2008 444 451
12. T.M. Bateman, G.V. Heller, and A.I. McGhie Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated tc-99m sestamibi SPECT J Nucl Cardiol 13 2006 24 33
13. S. Senthamizhchelvan, P.E. Bravo, and C. Esaias Human biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 82Rb J Nucl Med 51 2010 1592 1599
14. L.J. Shaw, and J. Narula Beyond the glass ceiling - achieving gender equity in risk stratification for cardiovascular imaging J Am Coll Cardiol Img 4 2011 924 925
15. R. Fazel, and L.J. Shaw Radiation exposure from radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: concerns and solutions J Nucl Cardiol 18 2011 562 565
16. R. Fazel, V. Dilsizian, A.J. Einstein, E.P. Ficaro, M. Henzlova, and L.J. Shaw Strategies for defining an optimal risk-benefit ratio for stress myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Cardiol 18 2011 385 392
17. M.D. Cerqueira, K.C. Allman, and E.P. Ficaro Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging J Nucl Cardiol 17 2010 709 718
18. S. Senthamizhchelvan, P.E. Bravo, M.A. Lodge, J. Merrill, F.M. Bengel, and G. Sgouros Radiation dosimetry of 82Rb in humans under pharmacologic stress J Nucl Med 52 2011 485 491
19. K. Yoshinaga, B.J. Chow, and K. Williams What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2006 1029 1039
20. K. Lertsburapa, A.W. Ahlberg, and T.M. Bateman Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease J Nucl Cardiol 15 2008 745 753
21. M.C. Ziadi, R.A. Dekemp, and K.A. Williams Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia J Am Coll Cardiol 58 2011 740 748
22. K. Fukushima, M.S. Javadi, and T. Higuchi Prediction of short-term cardiovascular events using quantification of global myocardial flow reserve in patients referred for clinical 82Rb PET perfusion imaging J Nucl Med 52 2011 726 732
23. B.J. Chow, O.M. Al Shammeri, and R.S. Beanlands Prognostic value of treadmill exercise and dobutamine stress positron emission tomography Can J Cardiol 25 2009 e220 e224
24. S. Dorbala, R. Hachamovitch, and Z. Curillova Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2 2009 846 854
25. S. Dorbala, M.F. Di Carli, and R.S. Beanlands Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 176 184
26. M.E. Merhige, W.J. Breen, V. Shelton, T. Houston, B.J. D'Arcy, and A.F. Perna Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging with PET and (82)Rb on downstream invasive procedure utilization, costs, and outcomes in coronary disease management J Nucl Med 48 2007 1069 1076
27. R.J. Gibbons, G.J. Balady, and J.T. Bricker ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines) J Am Coll Cardiol 40 2002 1531 1540
28. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Available at: http://www.asnc.org/imageuploads/ ImagingGuidelinesPETJuly2009.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
29. R. Hachamovitch, A. Rozanski, and L.J. Shaw Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy Eur Heart J 32 2011 1012 1024
30. A. Rozanski, H. Gransar, S.W. Hayes, J.D. Friedman, R. Hachamovitch, and D.S. Berman Comparison of long-term mortality risk following normal exercise vs adenosine myocardial perfusion spect J Nucl Cardiol 17 2010 999 1008
31. S. Dorbala, M.F. Di Carli, and R.S. Beanlands Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 176 184
32. M.J. Pencina, R.B. D'Agostino Sr., and E.W. Steyerberg Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers Stat Med 30 2011 11 21
33. M.J. Pencina, R.B. D'Agostino Sr., and O.V. Demler Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models Stat Med 31 2012 101 113
34. M.J. Pencina, R.B. D'Agostino Sr., R.B. D'Agostino Jr., and R.S. Vasan Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond Stat Med 27 2008 157 172 discussion 207-12
35. O.R. Coelho-Filho, L.F. Seabra, and F.P. Mongeon Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex J Am Coll Cardiol Img 4 2011 850 861
36. L.D. Metz, M. Beattie, R. Hom, R.F. Redberg, D. Grady, and K.E. Fleischmann The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 49 2007 227 237
37. R. Hachamovitch, D.S. Berman, and H. Kiat Effective risk stratification using exercise myocardial perfusion spect in women: gender-related differences in prognostic nuclear testing J Am Coll Cardiol 28 1996 34 44
38. R. Hachamovitch, D.S. Berman, and H. Kiat Gender-related differences in clinical management after exercise nuclear testing J Am Coll Cardiol 26 1995 1457 1464
39. L.J. Shaw, R. Bugiardini, and C.N. Merz Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge J Am Coll Cardiol 54 2009 1561 1575
40. L.J. Shaw, J.H. Mieres, and R.H. Hendel Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial Circulation 124 2011 1239 1249
41. D.S. Berman, X. Kang, and S.W. Hayes Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men. Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management J Am Coll Cardiol 41 2003 1125 1133
42. A. Abidov, R. Hachamovitch, and S.W. Hayes Are shades of gray prognostically useful in reporting myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2 2009 290 298
43. A. Abidov, A. Rozanski, and R. Hachamovitch Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing New Engl J Med 353 2005 1889 1898
44. D.S. Berman, A. Abidov, and X. Kang Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation J Nucl Cardiol 11 2004 414 423
45. R. Hachamovitch, S.W. Hayes, J.D. Friedman, I. Cohen, and D.S. Berman A prognostic score for prediction of cardiac mortality risk after adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy J Am Coll Cardiol 45 2005 722 729
46. L.J. Shaw, F.G. Hage, D.S. Berman, R. Hachamovitch, and A. Iskandrian Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be? J Nucl Cardiol 19 2012 1026 1043
47. L.J. Shaw, J.K. Min, R. Hachamovitch, R.C. Hendel, S. Borges-Neto, and D.S. Berman Nomograms for estimating coronary artery disease prognosis with gated stress myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Cardiol 19 2012 43 52
48. A.J. Einstein Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare? Heart 94 2008 1519 1521
49. A.J. Einstein Medical imaging: the radiation issue Nat Rev Cardiol 6 2009 436 438
50. J. Chen, A.J. Einstein, and R. Fazel Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 56 2010 702 711
51. L.J. Shaw, and A.E. Iskandrian Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Cardiol 11 2004 171 185
52. M.S. Lauer, E.H. Blackstone, J.B. Young, and E.J. Topol Cause of death in clinical research: time for a reassessment? J Am Coll Cardiol 34 1999 618 620