Water quality analysis using a variable consistency dominance-based rough set approach

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 43, Issue , 2014, Pages 25-33

  Karami, Jalal ^a   Alimohammadi, Abbas ^b   Seifouri, Tayebeh ^c  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^c TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Iran; Latyan Dam watershed; Moving average filter; Total dissolved solids; Variable consistency dominance based rough set approach; Water quality

Indexed keywords

DOMINANCE-BASED ROUGH SET APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; IRAN; LAND SURFACE TEMPERATURE; LOWER AND UPPER APPROXIMATIONS; MOVING AVERAGE FILTER; TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS; WATER QUALITY INDICATORS;

ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; ROUGH SET THEORY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCES; WATERSHEDS;

WATER POLLUTION;

MODIS; POLLUTION MONITORING; RUNOFF; SOLID; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

IRAN; LATYAN BASIN; TEHRAN [IRAN];

EID: 84887173794     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berdanier B.w., Ziadat A.H. Evaluation of a total dissolved solids model in comparison to actual field data measurements in the cheyenne river, South Dakota, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2006, 117:335-344.
2. Blaszczynski, J., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R., Szelag, M., 2009. jMAF User's guide - Dominance-based rough set data analysis framework.
3. Błaszczynski J., Greco S., Slowinski R. Multi-criteria classification - A new scheme for application of dominance-based decision rules. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 181:1030-1044.
4. Brix K.V., Gerdes R., Curry N., Kasper A., Grosell M. The effects of total dissolved solids on egg fertilization and water hardening in two lmonids-Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) and Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma). Aquatic Toxicology 2010, 97:109-115.
5. Chen Y., Hipel K.W., Kilgour D.M., Zhu Y. A strategic classification support system for brown field redevelopment. Environmental Modelling and Software 2009, 24:647-654.
6. Czyzewski A. Automatic identification of sound source position employing neural networks and rough sets. Pattern Recognition Letters 2003, 24(6):921-933.
7. Czyzewski A., Krolikowski R. Neuro-rough control of masking thresholds for audio signal enhancement. Neurocomputing 2001, 36:5-27.
8. Dempster A.P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1967, 38:325-339.
9. Dubois D., Prade H. Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. International Journal of General Systems 1990, 17:191-209.
10. Dubois D., Prade H. Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together. Intelligent decision support - Handbook of applications and advances of the rough sets theory 1992, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. R. Slowinski (Ed.).
11. Duckham M., Mason K., Stell J., Worboys M. A formal approach to imperfection in geographic information. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2001, 25:89-103.
12. Etemad-Shahidi A., Afshar A., Alikia H., Moshfeghi H. Total dissolved solid modeling; karkheh reservoir case example. International Journal of Environmental Research 2009, 3(4).
13. Gorsevski P.V., Jankowski P., Karami J. Discerning landslide susceptibility using rough sets. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2008, 32:53-65.
14. Greco S., Matarazzo B., Slowinski R. Rough approximation by dominance relations. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2002, 17:153-171.
15. Huang F., Wang X., Lou L., Zhou Z., Wu J. Spatial variation and source apportionment of water pollution in Qiantang River (China) using statistical techniques. Water Research 2010, 44:1562-1572.
16. Kostek B. Soft computing in acoustics, applications of neural networks, fuzzy logic and rough sets to physical acoustics. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 1999, 31.
17. Kostek B. Perception-based data processing in acoustics: Applications to music information retrieval and psychophysiology of hearing. Studies in Computational Intelligence 2005, 3.
18. Lindenschmit K.-E. The effect of complexity on parameter sensitivity and model uncertainty in river water quality modeling. Ecological Modelling 2006, 190:72-86.
19. Magazinovic R., Nicholson B., Mulcahy D., Davey Bromide levels in natural waters its relationship to levels of both chloride and total dissolved solids and the implications for water treatment. Chemosphere 2004, 57:329-335.
20. Mahjouri N., Kerachian R. Revising river water quality monitoring networks using discrete entropy theory: The Jajrood River experience. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2011, 175:291-302.
21. Maillard P., Pinheiro Santos N.A. A spatial-statistical approach for modeling the effect of non-point source pollution on different water quality parameters in the Velhas river watershed - Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 86:158-170.
22. Meyers, D. (1975). Mortality and water hardness: Lancet.
23. Mohammadkhan S., Ahmadi H., Jafari M. Relationship between soil erosion, slope, parent material, and distance to road (Case study: Latian Watershed, Iran). Arabian Journal of Geoscience 2011, 4:331-338.
24. Nikoo M.R., Kerachian R., Malakpour-Estalaki S., Bashi-Azghadi S.N., Azimi-Ghadikolaee M.M. A probabilistic water quality index for river water quality assessment: A case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2010.
25. Pardakhti A.R., Nabi Bidhendi G.R., Torabian A., Karbassi A., Yunesian M. Comparative cancer risk assessment of THMs in drinking water from well water sources and surface water sources. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2010.
26. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Science 1982, 11(5):341-356.
27. Pekey H., Karakas D., Bakoglu M. Source apportionment of trace metals in surface waters of a polluted stream using multivariate statistical analyses. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2004, 49:809-818.
28. Peters J.F., Han L., Ramanna S. Rough neural computing in signal analysis. Computational Intelligence 2001, 17(3):493-513.
29. Pimpunchat B., Sweatman W.L., Wake G.C., Triampo W., Parshotam A. A mathematical model for pollution in a river and its remediation by aeration. Applied Mathematics Letters 2009, 22:304-308.
30. Razmkhah H., Abrishamchi A., Torkian A. Evaluation of spatial and temporal variation in water quality by pattern recognition techniques: A case study on Jajrood River (Tehran, Iran). Journal of Environmental Management 2010, 91:852-860.
31. Saeedi M., Hosseinzadeh M., Rajabzadeh M. Competitive heavy metals adsorption on natural bed sediments of Jajrood River, Iran. Environmental Earth Science 2011, 62:519-527.
32. Sawyer C.N., McCarty P.L., Parkin G.F. Chemistry for environmental engineering and science 2003, McGraw Hill.
33. Slowinski R., Stefanowski J. Rough classification in incomplete information systems. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 1989, 12.
34. Sokolova M.V., Fernandez-Caballero A. Modeling and implementing an agent-based environmental health impact decision support system. Expert Systems with Applications 2009, 36:2603-2614.
35. Su, S., Zhi, J., Lou, L., Huang, F., Chen, X., & Wu, J. (2010). Spatio-temporal patterns and source apportionment of pollution in Qiantang River (China) using neural-based modeling and multivariate statistical techniques. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, In Press, Corrected Proof.
36. Triantaphyllou E., Felici G. Data mining and knowledge discovery approaches based on rule induction. Techniques 2006.
37. Tsumoto S., Hirano S. Automated discovery of chronological patterns in long time-series medical datasets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2005, 20(6):737-757.
38. Wang F., Hasbani J.-G., Wang X., Marceau D.J. Identifying dominant factors for the calibration of a land-use cellular automata model using rough set theory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2010.
39. Wieczorkowska A., Wroblewski J., Synak P., Slezak D. Application of temporal descriptors to musical instrument sound recognition. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 2003, 21(1):71-93.
40. Worboys M. Computation with imprecise geospatial data computers. Environment and Urban Systems 1998, 22(2):85-106.
41. Wygralak W. Rough sets and fuzzy sets - Some remarks on interrelations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1989, 29:241-243.
42. Yao Y.Y. A comparative study of fuzzy sets and rough sets. Information Sciences 1998, 109.
43. Zeinivand H., Smedt F.D. Hydrological modeling of snow accumulation and melting on river basin scale. Water Resources Management 2009, 23:2271-2287.
44. Zhai L.-Y., Khoo L.-P., Zhong Z.-W. A rough set based decision support approach to improving consumer affective satisfaction in product design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2009, 39:295-302.
45. Zhai L.-Y., Khoo L.-P., Zhong Z.-W. A dominance-based rough set approach to Kansei Engineering in product development. Expert Systems with Applications 2009, 36:393-402.
46. Zhou F., Huang G.H., Guo H., Zhang W., Hao Z. Spatio-temporal patterns and source apportionment of coastal water pollution in eastern Hong Kong. Water Research 2007, 41:3429-3439.