Improving the reporting of P-values generated by randomization methods

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1033-1036

  Ruxton, Graeme D ^a   Neuhäuser, Markus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b Fachbereich Mathematik und Technik   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bootstrap testing; Exact P values; Monte Carlo methods; Null hypothesis significance testing; Permutation tests; Resampling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887137375     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2041210X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12102     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Gandy, A. (2009) Sequential implementation of Monte Carlo Tests with uniformly bounded resampling risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 1504-1511.
2. Hauschke, D. & Steinijans, V.W. (2000) The U.S. draft guidance regarding population and individual bioequivalence approaches: comments by a research-based pharmaceutical company. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 2769-2774.
3. Manly, B.F.J. (2007) Randomisation, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
4. Massaro, M. & Blair, D. (2003) Comparison of population numbers of yellow-eyed penguins, Megadyptes antipodes, on Stewart Island and on adjacent cat-free islands. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 27, 107-113.
5. Neuhäuser, M. (2009) The importance of the biological system underlying the data when choosing a statistical test: why penguins need to be treated differently to parasites. Animal Behaviour, 77, E1-E3.
6. Neuhäuser, M. (2012) Nonparametric Statistical Tests: A Computational Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
7. Ruxton, G.D. (2006) The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 688-690.
8. Wellek, S. (2000) On a reasonable disaggregate criterion of population bioequivalence admitting of resampling-free testing procedures. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 2755-2767.