Exploring 3-D virtual reality technology for spatial ability and chemistry achievement

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 579-590

  Merchant, Z ^a   Goetz, E T ^a   Keeney Kennicutt, W ^a   Cifuentes, L ^b   Kwok, O ^a   Davis, T J ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI   (United States)

Author keywords

3 D virtual worlds; Chemistry achievement; Second Life; Spatial instruction; Virtual environment spatial ability; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887081184     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. J. (1999). High-School chemistry students' performance and gender differences in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 257-271.
2. Bodner, G. M., & Guay, R. B. (1997). The Purdue visualization of rotations test. Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s00897970138a
3. Carter, C., LaRussa, M., & Bodner, G. (1987). A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 645-657.
4. Coleman, S., & Gotch, A. (1998). Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 206-209.
5. Contreras, M. J., Martínez-Molina, A., & Santacreu, J. (2011). Do the sex differences play such an important role in explaining performance in spatial tasks? Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 659-663.
6. Copolo, C. E., & Hounshell, P. B. (1995). Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 295-305. doi: 10.1007/BF02211261
7. Dalgarno, B., Hedberg, J., & Harper, B. (2002). The Contribution of 3-D Environments to Conceptual Understanding. In A. Williamson, C. Gunn, A. Young, & T. Clear (Eds.), Winds of change in the sea of learning: Charting the course of digital education, proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 149-158). Auckland, NZ: UNITEC Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/proceedings/papers/051.pdf
8. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
9. Estes, Z., & Felker, S. (2012). Confidence mediates the sex difference in mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3, 557-570.
10. Ferk Savec, V., Vrtačnik, M., & Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Evaluating the educational value of molecular structure representations. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (Models and modeling in science education, Vol. 1, pp. 269-300). Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Harle, M., & Towns, M. (2011). A review of spatial ability literature, its connection to chemistry, and implications for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 351-360. doi: 10.1021/ed900003n
12. Hedberg, J., & Alexander, S. (1994). Virtual reality in education: Defining researchable issues. Educational Media International, 31, 214-220. doi: 10.1080/0952398940310402
13. Limniou, M., Roberts, D., & Papadopoulos, N. (2008). Full immersive virtual environment CAVETM in chemistry education. Computers and Education, 5, 584-593. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.014
14. Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 181-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-Spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Educator, 83, 33-54.
16. Merchant, Z., Goetz, E., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O., Cifuentes, L., & Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3-D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers and Education, 59, 551-568.
17. Mohler, J. L. (2008). A review of spatial ability research. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 72, 19-30.
18. Moore, P. (1995). Learning and teaching in virtual worlds: Implications of virtual reality for education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 11, 91-102.
19. Ozmen, H. (2008). The influence of computer-assisted instruction on students' conceptual understanding of chemical bonding and attitude toward chemistry: A case of Turkey. Computers and Education, 51, 423-438.
20. Pellegrino, J., & Hunt, E. (1991). Cognitive models for understanding and assessing spatial abilities. In H. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence: Reconceptualisation and measurement (pp. 203-225). Melbourne: ACER & Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Pellegrino, J. W., & Kail, R. (1982). Process analyses of spatial aptitude. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 311-366). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Piburn, M., Reynolds, S., Leedy, D., McAuliffe, C., Birk, J., & Johnson, J. (2002). The hidden earth: Visualization of geologic features and their subsurface geometry. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) annual meetings, April 7-10, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana.
23. Pietsch, S., & Jansen, P. (2012). Different mental rotation performance in students of music, sport and education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 159-163.
24. Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Wilson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25. Robichaux, R. R., & Guarino, A. J. (2000, November). Predictors of visualization: A structural equation model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY.
26. Second Life.com. (2011, October). What is Second Life®. Retrieved on January 8, 2012 from http://secondlife.com/whatis/
27. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
28. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251-266.
29. Tuckey, H., Selvaratnam, M., & Bradley, J. (1991). Identification and rectification of student difficulties concerning three-dimensional structures, rotation, and reflection. Journal of Chemical Education, 68, 460-464. doi: 10.1021/ed068p460
30. Urhahne, D., Nick, S., & Schanze, S. (2009). The effect of three-dimensional simulations on the understanding of chemical structures and their properties. Research in Science Education, 39, 495-513. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9091-z
31. Wu, H., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88, 465-492.