The Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University and the Prospects for Anticipatory Governance

Nanoscale: Issues and Perspectives for the Nano Century

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 377-392

  Guston, David H ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CNS ASU and anticipatory governance; Nano scale Informal Science Education Network (NISE Net) mission; Research and Innovation Systems Analysis (RISA)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887072992     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470165874.ch21     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Berne, Rosalyn. 2005. Nanotalk: Conversations with Scientists and Engineers about Ethics, Meaning, and Belief in the Development of Nanotechnology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
2. Bond, Philip. 2005. "Preparing the Path for Nanotechnology." p. 16-21 in Nanotechnology: Societal Implications-Maximizing Benefit for Humanity. Roco, Mihail and Bainbridge, William S., eds. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; Available at www.nano.- gov/nni_societal_implications.pdf.
3. Crow, Michael M. 2006. "Vision and University Goals: 2002-2012." Available at http:// www.asu.edu/president/vision-goals/index.html.
4. ETC Group. 2003. "Size matters: No small matter, II - The case for a global moratorium." Occasional Paper Series 7(1).
5. Feldman, Martha S., Khademian, Anne M., Ingram, Helen, and Schneider, Anne. 2006. "Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices."
6. Fisher, Erik. (2006). Midstream Modulation of Technology: A Case Study in US Federal Legislation on Integrating Societal Considerations into Nanotechnology. A doctoral dissertation completed at the University of Colorado, Boulder.
7. Fisher, Erik and Mahajan, Roop. 2006. "Contradictory intent? US federal legislation on integrating societal concerns into nanotechnology research and development." Science and Public Policy 33(1):5-16.
8. Guston, David H. 1999. Social Studies of Science.
9. Guston, David H. and Sarewitz, Daniel. 2002. "Real-time technology assessment." Technology in Culture 24:93-109.
10. Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge. New York: Routledge.
11. Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12. McCray, Patrick. 2005. "Will small be beautiful? Making policies for our nanotech future." History of Technology 21(2):177-203.
13. Mowery, David and Rosenberg, Nathan. 1991. Technology and Economic Growth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Porter, Alan, Youtie, Jan, and Shapira, Phil. (2006). "Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology." White paper Available at http://cns.asu.edu/cns-library/author.htm (retrieved on October 19, 2006).
15. Roco, Mihail and Bainbridge, William S. 2001. Societal Implication of Nanotechnology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Roco, M. (2006, May). "Keynote Address." Center on Nanotechnology and Society-First Annual NanoPolicy Conference, National Press Club, Washington, DC.
17. van Merkerk, Rutger, Guston, David H., and Smits, Ruud. 2006, November. "An international comparison of recent technology assessment approaches: bypassing Collingridge." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, Vancouver.
18. Winner, Langdon. 2003. "Testimony to the Committee on Science of the US House of Representatives on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology." Available at http:// www.house.gov/science/hearings/full03/apr09/winner.htm.