The impact of supported standing on well-being and quality of life

Physiotherapy Canada

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 344-352

  Nordström, Birgitta ^a   Näslund, Annika ^a   Eriksson, Margareta ^a   Nyberg, Lars ^a   Ekenberg, Lilly ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Disabled persons; Postural balance; Quality of life; Self help devices

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887061103     PISSN: 03000508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2012-27     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Glickman LB, Geigle PR, Paleg GS. A systematic review of supported standing programs. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010;3(3):197-213. Medline:21791851
2. Arva J, Paleg G, Lange M, et al. RESNA position on the application of wheelchair standing devices. Assist Technol. 2009;21(3):161-8, quiz 169-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400430903175622. Medline:19908680
3. Ellis-Hill C. Identity and sense of self: the significance of personhood in rehabilitation. JARNA. 2011;14(1):6-12.
4. Nordstrom B, Näslund A, Ekenberg L. On an equal footing: adults' accounts of the experience of using assistive devices for standing. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(1):49-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2012.678031. Medline:22519553
5. Dunn RB, Walter JS, Lucero Y, et al. Follow-up assessment of standing mobility device users. Assist Technol. 1998;10(2):84-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131966. Medline:10339284
6. Walter JS, Sola PG, Sacks J, et al. Indications for a home standing program for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 1999;22(3):152-8. Medline:10685379
7. Eng JJ, Levins SM, Townson AF, et al. Use of prolonged standing for individuals with spinal cord injuries. Phys Ther. 2001;81(8):1392-9. Medline:11509069
8. Hamilton MT, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, et al. Too little exercise and too much sitting: inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2008;2(4):292-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12170-008-0054-8. Medline:22905272
9. Ekblom-Bak EL, Ekblom B. Minskat stillasittande lika viktigt som okad fysisk aktivitet. Lakartidningen. 2010;107(9):587-8. Medline:20387756
10. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, et al, And the Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Effect of physical inactivity on major noncommunicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. Medline:22818936
11. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12. Medline:21681120
12. Forskrivningsprocessen, fritt val av hjälpmedel, egenansvar: tre olika vägar till hjälpmedel [homepage on the Internet]. Stockholm: Hjälpmedelsinstitutet; 2011 [cited 2012 Jan 12]. Available from: http://ww.hi.se/Global/pdf/2011/11357-forskrivningsprocessen.pdf
13. ICF W. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. p. 3-25.
14. Pless M, Granlund M. Handbok i att använda ICF och ICF-CY. Stockholm: Studentlitteratur; 2011.
15. Pape TL-B, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1-3):5-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280110066235. Medline:11827155
16. Hocking C. Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technol Disabil. 1999;11(1-2):3-11.
17. Huang I, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Children's perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings. Assist Technol. 2009;4(2):95-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483100802613701. Medline:19253098
18. Brooks R, De Charro F. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37(1):53-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6. Medline:10158943
19. International Organization for Standardization. Technical aids for persons with disabilities-classification and terminology. 3rd ed. Genève: Iso; 2002.
20. Hammel J. Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities? Nurs Clin North Am. 2003;38(2):331-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S00296465(02)00053-1. Medline:12914311
21. Taylor K. Factors affecting prescription and implementation of standing-frame programs by school-based physical therapists for children with impaired mobility. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2009;21(3):282-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181b175cd. Medline:19680071
22. Jeppsson Grassman E, Holme L, Taghizadeh Larsson A, et al. A long life with a particular signature: life course and aging for people with disabilities. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2012;55(2):95-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2011.633975. Medline:22324328
23. Shields RK, Dudley-Javoroski S. Monitoring standing wheelchair use after spinal cord injury: a case report. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(3):142-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280400009337. Medline:15823996
24. Scherer MJ, Craddock G. Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil. 2002;14(3):125-31.
25. Scherer MJ, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50(2):132-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.132.
26. Alekna V, Tamulaitiene M, Sinevicius T, et al. Effect of weight-bearing activities on bone mineral density in spinal cord injured patients during the period of the first two years. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(11):727-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.36. Medline:18443599
27. Anderson LS, Heyne LA. Physical activity for children and adults with disabilities: An issue of "amplified" importance. Disabil Health J. 2010;3(2):71-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.11.004. Medline:21122770
28. Soberg HL, Finset A, Roise O, et al. Identification and comparison of rehabilitation goals after multiple injuries: an ICF analysis of the patients', physiotherapists' and other allied professionals' reported goals. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(5):340-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0174. Medline:18461258
29. Wilkowska W, Gaul S, Ziefle M. A small but significant difference- the role of gender on acceptance of medical assistive technologies. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2010;6389:82-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_6.
30. Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(9):439-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638289609165907. Medline:8877302