Pro-poor development performance of livestock projects: Analysis and lessons from projects' documentation;Résultats en matière de développement pro-pauvres des projets basés sur l'élevage: Analyse et enseignements tirés de la documentation de projets

Development in Practice

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 889-907

  Wanyoike, Francis ^a   Baker, Derek ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Aid Aid effectiveness; Labour and livelihoods Poverty reduction

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT; AID FLOW; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT; LIVESTOCK FARMING; POVERTY;

EID: 84887059894     PISSN: 09614524     EISSN: 13649213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2013.811470     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ashley, S., S. Holden, P. Bazely (1999). Livestock in Poverty-Focused Development, Crewekerne: Livestock in Development.
2. Ben-Akiva, M., M. Bierlaire (2003). Discrete Choice Models with Applications to Departure Time and Route Choice. In HallR. W. (Ed.), Handbook of Transportation Science, 2nd ed, (pp. 7-38). Norwell: Kluwer Scientific.
3. CGIAR Fund (2012). CGIAR Policy for Independent External Evaluation.,Accessed August 15, www.cgiarfund.org/independent_evaluation_arrangement
4. CIDA (Canadian international Development Agency) 2004. CIDA Evaluation Guide. CIDA, Ottawa, Canada
5. De Haan, C., T. Schillhorn van Veen, B. Brandenburg, J. Gauthier, F. Le Gall, R. Mearns, M. Simeon (2001). Livestock Development: Implications for Rural Poverty, The Environment and Global Food Security. Washington DC: The World Bank.
6. Delgado, C. (2003). Rising Consumption of Meat and Milk in Developing Countries Has Created a New Food Revolution. Journal of Nutrition, 133, 3907-3910.
7. EuropeAID (2004). Project Cycle Management Guidelines. Brussels: EuropeAID.
8. FAO (2001). Project Cycle Management Technical Guide - Socio-Economic and Gender Analysis Program (SEAGA). Rome: FAO.
9. Foresti, M. (2007). A Comparative Study of Evaluation Policies and Practices in Development Agencies, Paris: Département de la Réserche, Division Évaluation et capitalization, Agence Franşaise de Développement.
10. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. New York: Prentice Hall International.
11. Heffernan, C. (2004). Livestock and the Poor: Issues in Poverty-Focused Livestock Development. In OwenE.SmithT.SteeleM. A.AndersonS.DuncanA. J.HerreroM.LeaverJ. D.ReynoldsC. K.RichardsJ. I.Ku-VeraJ. C. (Ed.), In Responding to the Livestock Revolution: The Role of Globalization and Implications for Poverty Alleviation, (pp. 229-245). Midlothian: British Society of Animal Science.
12. ILRI (2002). Mapping Poverty and Livestock in the Developing World, Nairobi: ILRI.
13. Judge, G. G., R. C. Hill, W. E. Griffths, H. Lukepohl, T. C. Lee (1988). The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 3rd edNew York: John Wiley.
14. Kaiser, K. F. (1958). The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrica, 23, 169-187. doi: 10.1007/BF02289233
15. Kitalyi, A., L. Mtenga, J. Morton, A. McLeod, P. Thornton, A. Dorward, M. Saadullah (2005). Why Keep Livestock if You are Poor?. In OwenE.KitalyiA.JayasuriyaN.SmithT. (Ed.), Livestock and Wealth Creation, Improving the Husbandry of Animals Kept by Resource-Poor People in Developing Countries, (pp. 13-27). Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
16. McPeak, J., C. Doss, C. Barrett (2006). Development Priorities in the Rangelands of Northern Kenya and Southern Ethiopia: Results of a Ranking Exercise among Pastoralists. Davis: Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program. University of California.
17. Moyo, S., F. J. C. Swanepoel (2010). Multifunctionality of Livestock in Developing Communities. In MoyoS.StroebelA.SwanepoelF. (Ed.), In The Role of Livestock in Developing Communities: Enhancing Multifunctionality, (pp. 1-11). Bloemfontein: Sun Media.
18. NORAD (2005). Development Co-Operation Manual, Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
19. OECD (1991). DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance. Paris: OECD.
20. OECD (2012). Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD-DAC) DAC Guidelines and Reference Series, Accessed August 15, www.oecd.org/dac/dacguidelinesandreferenceseries.htm
21. Otte, J., A. Costales, J. Dijkman, U. Pica-Ciamarra, T. Robinson, V. Ahuja, C. Ly, D. Roland-Holst (2012). Livestock Sector Development for Poverty Reduction: An Economic and Policy Perspective - Livestock's Many Virtues, Rome: FAO.
22. Reist, S., F. Hintermann, R. Sommer (2007). The Livestock Revolution: An Opportunity for Poor Farmers?. InfoResources FOCUS No. 1/07. Geneva: Swiss Agency for Development Co-operation.
23. Steinfeld, H., P. Gerber, T. Wassenaar, V. Castel, M. Rosales, C. de Haan (2006). Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, Rome: FAO.
24. StemC.MargoluisR.SalafskyN.BrownM. (2003)."Foundations of Success - A Review of Monitoring and Evaluation Approaches and Lessons Learned in Conservation."Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and Conservation International (CI) Proceedings of World Parks Congress Durban, South Africa, September 8-18
25. UNDP (2001). Development Effectiveness: Review of Evaluative Evidence. New York: UNDP Evaluation Office.
26. World Bank (2008). Tracking Results in Agricultural and Rural Development in Less-Than-Ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for Rural Development. Rome and Washington DC: FAO & World Bank.
27. Zezza, A., P. Winter, D. Benjamin, G. Carletto, K. Covarrubias, E. Quiñones, K. Stamoulis, L. Tasciotti, S. Di Giuseppe (2007). Rural Household Access to Assets and Agrarian Institutions: A Cross Country Comparison. Working Paper No. 07-17 Rome: FAO, Agricultural and Development Economics Division.