Components associated with home visiting program outcomes: A meta-analysis

Pediatrics

Volumn 132, Issue SUPPL.2, 2013, Pages

  Filene, Jill H ^a   Kaminski, Jennifer W ^b   Valle, Linda Anne ^b   Cachat, Patrice ^a  

^a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ^*  (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Birth outcomes; Child cognitive development; Child maltreatment; Child physical health; Early childhood; Effectiveness; Home visiting; Infancy; Maternal life course; Meta analysis; Parenting behavior

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; COGNITION; COPING BEHAVIOR; EFFECT SIZE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOME CARE; HOME VISITING PROGRAM; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

BIRTH OUTCOMES; CHILD COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; CHILD MALTREATMENT; CHILD PHYSICAL HEALTH; EARLY CHILDHOOD; EFFECTIVENESS; HOME VISITING; INFANCY; MATERNAL LIFE COURSE; META-ANALYSIS; PARENTING BEHAVIOR;

HOME CARE SERVICES; HOUSE CALLS; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84887038935     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-1021H     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Shonkoff J, Phillips D. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
2. Brooks-Gunn J, Markman LB. The contribution of parenting to ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. Future Child. 2005;15(1):139-168. (Pubitemid 41686156)
3. Guterman N. Stopping Child Maltreatment Before it Starts: Emerging Horizons in Early Home Visitation Services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
4. Krugman RD. Universal home visiting: A recommendation from the US Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. Future Child. 1993;3(3):184-191.
5. American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on Child and Adolescent Health, The role of home-visitation programs in improving health outcomes for children and families. Pediatrics. 1998;101(3 pt 1):486-489.
6. Bilukha O, Hahn RA, Crosby A, et al; Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The effectiveness of early childhood home visitation in preventing violence: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2 suppl 1):11-39. (Pubitemid 40208568)
7. National Governors Association, Center for Best Practices. The benefits and financing of home visiting programs. Available at: www.nga.org/Files/pdf/ BENEFITSFINANCINGHOME.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2008.
8. Butchart A, Harvey AP, Mian M, Furniss T. Preventing Child Maltreatment: A Guide to Taking Action and Generating Evidence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.
9. Gomby DS. Home Visitation in 2005: Outcomes for Children and Parents. Invest in Kids Working Paper No. 7. Washington, DC: Committee for Economic Development; 2005.
10. Guterman NB. Enrollment strategies in early home visitation to prevent physical child abuse and neglect and the "universal versus targeted" debate: A meta-analysis of population-based and screening-based programs. Child Abuse Negl. 1999;23(9): 863-890. (Pubitemid 29398619)
11. Layzer JI, Goodson BD, Bernstein L, Price C. National Evaluation of Family Support Programs. Final Report. Volume A: The Meta- Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc; 2001.
12. Sweet MA, Appelbaum MI. Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Dev. 2004;75(5): 1435-1456. (Pubitemid 39442890)
13. Avellar S, Paulsell D, Sama-Miller E, Del Grosso P. Home visiting evidence of effectiveness review: executive summary. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC. Available at: http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/HomVEE-Executive-Summary-2012.pdf Accessed November 22, 2012.
14. Health Resources Service Administration. Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program. Available at: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs/ homevisiting. Accessed December 5, 2012.
15. Nievar M, Van Egeren LA, Pollard S. A metaanalysis of home visiting programs: moderators of improvements in maternal behavior. Inf Mental Hlth J. 2010;31(5):499- 520.
16. Kaminski JW, Valle LA, Filene JH, Boyle CL. A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008;36 (4):567-589.
17. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Boston, MA: Academic Press; 1985.
18. Bornstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat, Inc; 2005.
19. Lipsey MW, Wilson D. Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
20. Wilson DB. Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Available at: http://mason.gmu.edu/∼dwilsonb/ma.htmlAccessed January 23, 2012.
21. Hedges LV. A random effects model for effect sizes. Psychol Bull. 1983;93(2):388- 395.
22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-560. (Pubitemid 37088507)
23. Olds D, Henderson CR Jr, Kitzman H, Cole R. Effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on surveillance of child maltreatment. Pediatrics. 1995;95(3):365-372.
24. Chaffin M, Bard D. Impact of intervention surveillance bias on analyses of child welfare report outcomes. Child Maltreat. 2006; 11(4):301-312. (Pubitemid 44545785)