Revisiting social space: Relational thinking about organizational change

Research in Organizational Change and Development

Volumn 19, Issue , 2011, Pages 233-257

  Friedman, Victor J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887037381     PISSN: 08973016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0897-3016(2011)0000019010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Argryis, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
2. Bourdieu, P. (1985). Social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723-744
3. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25
4. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
5. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
6. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Introduction to reflexive sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
7. Bradbury, H., Lichtenstein, B., Carroll, J., & Senge, P. (2010). Relational space and learning experiments: The heart of sustainability collaborations. In: W. A. Pasmore, A. B.(Rami) Shani&R.W.Woodman (Eds), Research inOrganizational Change andDevelopment (Vol. 18, pp. 109-148). Bingley, UK: Emerald
8. Cassirer, E. (1923). Substance and function and Einstein's theory of relativity (Republished, 1953, New York: Dover Press). Chicago: Open Court Publishing
9. Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
10. Cassirer, E. (1961). The logic of the humanities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
11. Cohen-Navot, M., Frankovitch, S., & Reinfeld, T. (2000). Open and latent dropping out among youth. Jerusalem: Joint Distribution Committee-Brookdale Institute (in Hebrew)
12. Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organization environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-32
13. Friedman, V. (1997). Making schools safe for uncertainty: Teams, teaching, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 99(2), 335-370
14. Friedman, V. (2001). Action science: Creating communities of inquiry in communities of social practice. In: P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research (pp. 159-170). London: Sage
15. Friedman, V., & Lipshitz, R. (1992). Teaching people to shift cognitive gears: Overcoming resistance on the road to Model 2. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28(1), 118-137
16. Friedman, V., Razer, M., & Sykes, I. (2004). Towards a theory of inclusive practice: An action science approach. Action Research, 2(2), 183-205
17. Friedman, V., & Sykes, I. (2008). Can the concept "social space" reveal a deep structure essential to the theory and practice of organizational learning? Sixth Interdisciplinary Symposium on Knowledge and Space: Knowledge in Organizations - Learning Organizations, University of Heidelberg, Germany, September 17-26, 2008
18. Gold, M. (1999). The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
19. Jammer, M. (1954). Concepts of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
20. Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgenrgen Habermas. In: P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 91-102). London: Sage
21. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill
22. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts (Republished, 1997, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 153-422). New York: Harper & Row
23. Lewin, K. (1949). Cassirer's philosophy of science and the social sciences. In: P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Ernst Cassirer (pp. 269-288), and republished in M. Gold (Ed.). The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999
24. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (Republished, 1997, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 1-152.). New York: Harper&Row
25. Lewin, K. (1997). Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
26. Lipshitz, R., Friedman, V., & Popper, M. (2006). The demystification of organizational learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
27. Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1-49
28. Razer, M., Friedman, V., & Veronese, G. (2009). The "educational-psychosocial" approach to overcoming social exclusion in Israeli schools. Ricerche di Psicologia, 4, 196-211
29. Schein, E. H. (1969). The mechanisms of change, In: W. G. Bennis, K. D. Benne, & R. Chin (Eds), The Planning of Change (pp. 98-108). New York, NY: Hart, Rinehart & Winston
30. Semler, R. (1989). Managing without managers: Participative management at Brazil's Semco. Harvard Business Review, 67(5), 76-84
31. Warren, R. L. (1967). The interorganizational field as a focus of investigation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 396-419
32. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change principles of problem formation and resolution. New York: W.W. Norton
33. Weyl, H. (1924). Was ist materie? Berlin: J. Springer
34. Wicks, P. G., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. Action Research, 7, 243-262