A scheduling framework for adaptive video delivery over cellular networks

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MOBICOM

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 389-400

  Chen, Jiasi ^a   Mahindra, Rajesh ^b   Khojastepour, Mohammad A ^b   Rangarajan, Sampath ^b   Chiang, Mung ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive streaming; Cellular networks; Proportional fairness; Qoe

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE STREAMING; ADAPTIVE VIDEO STREAMING; CELLULAR NETWORK; OPTIMAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION; PROPORTIONAL FAIRNESS; QOE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK; RESOURCE VIRTUALIZATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HTTP; MOBILE COMPUTING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84887033682     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2500423.2500433     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. MPEG DASH standard. http://dashif.org/mpeg-dash.
2. S. Akhshabi et al. An Experimental Evaluation of Rate-Adaptation Algorithms in Adaptive Streaming over HTTP. In MMSys, 2011.
3. S. Akhshabi et al. What Happens When HTTP Adaptive Streaming Players Compete for Bandwidth? In NOSSDAV, 2012.
4. C. Muller et al. An Evaluation of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP in Vehicular Environments. In MoVid, 2012.
5. J. Jiang et al. Improving Fairness, Efficiency, and Stability in HTTP-based Adaptive Video Streaming. In CoNEXT, 2012.
6. R. Kokku et al. CellSlice: Cellular Wireless Resource Slicing for Active RAN Sharing. In COMSNETS, 2013.
7. PicoChip Femtocell Solutions. http://www.picochip.com/.
8. Intel WiMAX. http://tinyurl.com/73dp8wz.
9. Adobe HTTP Dynamic Streaming. http://tinyurl.com/aqnv7y5.
10. Akamai HD Streaming. http://tinyurl.com/yaknp7a.
11. Microsoft Smooth Streaming. http://tinyurl.com/cyqldms.
12. Apple http live streaming. http://tinyurl.com/cwkv9kz.
13. R.K. Jain et al. A Quantitative Measure Of Fairness And Discrimination For Resource Allocation In Shared Computer Systems. In Technical Report DEC, 1984.
14. N. Cranley et al. User perception of adapting video quality. In Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2006.
15. B.Shenet et al. A Quest for an Internet Video Quality-of-Experience Metric. In HotNets, 2012.
16. Adobe OSMF Player. http://www.osmf.org.
17. Sandvine. http://www.sandvine.com.
18. F. Kelly. Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. In European Transactions on Telecommunications, 1997.
19. M. Andrew et al. Optimal Utility Based Multi-User Throughput Allocation subject to Throughput Constraints. In Infocom, 2005.
20. H. Kellerer et al. Knapsack Problems. Springer, 2004.
21. 3GPP Standard Rel 8. http://www.3gpp.org/Release-8.
22. OPT++: An Object-Oriented Nonlinear Optimization Library. https://software.sandia.gov/opt++/.
23. R. Morris et al. The click modular router. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 33(5), 1999.
24. R. Mahindra et al. Farsighted Flow Management for Video Delivery in wireless networks. In COMSNETS, 2011.
25. G. Liebl et al. Advanced Wireless Multiuser Video Streaming using the Scalable Video Coding Extensions of H.264/MPEG4-AVC. In IEEE ICME, 2006.
26. M. Lu et al. Video streaming over 802.11 wlans with content-aware adaptive retry. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2007.
27. H. Zhang et al. Cross-Layer Optimization for Streaming Scalable Video over Fading Wireless Networks. In IEEE JSAC, 2010.
28. M. Burza et al. Adaptive Streaming of MPEG-based Audio/Video Content over Wireless Networks. Multimedia, 2007.
29. R. Mok et al. QDASH: QoE-aware DASH system. In MMSys, 2012.
30. Openwave Media Optimizer. http://www.openwave.com/solutions.
31. B. Shen et al. Dynamic video transcoding in mobile environments. In Proc. IEEE Multimedia, 2008.