Establishment of a simple predictive scoring system for pancreatic fistula after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 585-592

  Miyai, Hirotaka ^a   Hara, Masayasu ^a   Hayakawa, Tetsushi ^b   Takeyama, Hiromitsu ^a  

^a NAGOYA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Toyota Kai Medical Corporation Kariya Toyota General Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

gastric cancer; laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy; multivariate analysis; pancreatic fistula; predictive scoring model

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY ASSISTED GASTRECTOMY; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PANCREAS FISTULA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PANCREATIC FISTULA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

GASTRIC CANCER; LAPAROSCOPY-ASSISTED GASTRECTOMY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PREDICTIVE SCORING MODEL;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LOGISTIC MODELS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84887025611     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/den.12042     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 2008; 248: 721-727.
2. Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M, Kawano T, Sugihara K,. A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann. Surg. 2008; 247: 962-967.
3. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: Five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann. Surg. 2005; 241: 232-237.
4. Lee JH, Yom CK, Han HS,. Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23: 1759-1763.
5. Strong VE, Devaud N, Allen PJ, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit D,. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: A case-control study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009; 16: 1507-1513.
6. Obama K, Okabe H, Hosogi H, Tanaka E, Itami A, Sakai Y,. Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: From a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications. Surgery 2011; 149: 15-21.
7. Iwata N, Kodera Y, Eguchi T, et al. Amylase concentration of the drainage fluid as a risk factor for intra-abdominal abscess following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J. Surg. 2010; 34: 1534-1539.
8. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 1995; 345: 745-748.
9. Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: Preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet 1996; 347: 995-999.
10. Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Shinohara H, Sasako M,. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: A multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer 2010; 13: 238-244.
11. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N,. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann. Surg. 2007; 245: 68-72.
12. Kawamura H, Homma S, Yokota R, et al. Inspection of safety and accuracy of D2 lymph node dissection in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. World J. Surg. 2008; 32: 2366-2370.
13. Kronberg U, Kiran RP, Soliman MS, et al. A characterization of factors determining postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy enables the generation of a novel predictive score. Ann. Surg. 2011; 253: 78-81.
14. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB,. Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat. Med. 1996; 15: 361-387.
15. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L,. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. N. Engl. J. Med. 1985; 313: 793-799.
16. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan, 1999.
17. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13.
18. Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B,. Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom. J. 2005; 47: 458-472.
19. Altman DG, Royston P,. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat. Med. 2000; 19: 453-473.
20. McGinn TG, Guyatt GH, Wyer PC, Naylor CD, Stiell IG, Richardson WS,. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: How to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000; 284: 79-84.
21. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An interim report-a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann. Surg. 2010; 251: 417-420.
22. D'Amato A, Santella S, Cristaldi M, Gentili V, Pronio A, Montesani C,. The role of extended total gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51: 609-612.
23. Ichikawa D, Kurioka H, Yamaguchi T, et al. Postoperative complications following gastrectomy for gastric cancer during the last decade. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51: 613-617.
24. Sasako M, Katai H, Sano T, Maruyama K,. Management of complications after gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy. Surg. Oncol. 2000; 9: 31-34.
25. Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, et al. Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: Results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 2010; 252: 207-214.
26. Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R, et al. Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: Results of a prospective study in 137 patients. Ann. Surg. 2007; 246: 281-287.
27. Sano T, Sasako M, Katai H, Maruyama K,. Amylase concentration of drainage fluid after total gastrectomy. Br. J. Surg. 1997; 84: 1310-1312.
28. Yoshioka R, Saiura A, Koga R, et al. Risk factors for clinical pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: Analysis of consecutive 100 patients. World J. Surg. 2010; 34: 121-125.
29. Lee SE, Jang JY, Lim CS, et al. Measurement of pancreatic fat by magnetic resonance imaging: Predicting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 2010; 251: 932-936.
30. Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula and the risk factors of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2012; 19: 115-121.
31. Connor S, Alexakis N, Garden OJ, Leandros E, Bramis J, Wigmore SJ,. Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2005; 92: 1059-1067.
32. Pedrazzoli S, Liessi G, Pasquali C, Ragazzi R, Berselli M, Sperti C,. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas: Preventing severe complications and reducing reoperation and mortality rate. Ann. Surg. 2009; 249: 97-104.